Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Deborah Dupre (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Hollywood Targeted Individual Stephen Shellen Shocking Plea Reverberating Globally

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


By Deborah Dupré

Hollywood star Stephen Shellen has made an urgent albeit odd call this past week that has sent chills down the spines of many. He wants every Targeted Individual (TI), regardless of position or status, to muster courage to come forward, to break deafening silence about the crime being committed against innocent TIs, and to demand justice. It appears that Shellen is the TI poster man the community has sorely needed.

“…I’ve been stolen from, gas-lit, blacklisted, surveillanced and death threatened since 1995. Oh, did I mention ridiculed… also very popular with these creepy scumbags? My ex-wife Florence had bruises on her face and my son told me of a man hitting mommy. My son told me the man would hurt him more if he talked to me. My acting career was finished virtually overnight and rumor has it I was nuts!” These are recent words by Hollywood actor Stephen Shellen, who has called for urgent action by other TIs. So is the life of every TI.

Read: Are You a Targeted Individual? Foolproof Research Criteria Secrets

Is targeting a high-profile actor such as Shellen unusual? Not at all, according to one private investigator. Many well-known Hollywood stars silently identify with Shellen and also actor Randy Quaid, run out of the U.S. in fear. Most actor TIs, however, refuse to go public with their TI experiences, fearful of ruining their careers — and worse — for exposing their hellish experiences of being a TI, according to a conversation Dupré had with nationally recognized private investigator William Taylor.

“They don’t want to lose their credibility,” Taylor said, adding, “but there are many of them.”

How does Taylor know? Actors have hired him to help unravel the covert criminal phenomenon used against them, making them a TI, a person to destroy.

Taylor disclosed that more than 20 Hollywood actors had contacted him. Furthermore, he said most if not all had been forcibly chipped without their consent. That was five years ago. Since then, ranks of TIs have soared, in and outside Hollywood.

Making matters worse, fake news media outlets use stories such as both Quaid’s and Shellen’s to make them appear mentally ill, rather than conducting bona-fide investigations and learning that they were instead, mentally injured from criminal assaults on them. (The difference is that mental injuries heal when assaults end.)

That no other Hollywood stars other than Shellen and Quaid have braved ridicule, persecution and loss of career make these two men unique. Shellen says he has gone public knowing this truth is one that few, other than TIs, can really understand well enough to offer sympathy and support, yet he is trying.

Taylor had encouraged actors to come out of the closet to help break international silence on the crime.  Last week, Shellen pleaded with every person targeted in this covert criminal manner to go public. Only by uncovering the crime will the public be convinced TIs are injured by targeting, as intended, not mentally ill.

Nazi Persecution, Cognitive Dissonance Further Crime Against TIs

“I’m not nuts,” says Shellen, “but being harassed does have it’s down side.” Creatively, being targeted gave birth to a fire of inspiration and enlightenment, according to Shellen who adds, “ and if I do say so myself…some pretty cool art.”

Rather than expressing anger at family members, friends and others not trying to understand the crime against TIs, Shellen says he feels sorry for them due to their perception deficit, their inability to see reality about today’s world.

“I’m sorry to anyone who doubted me or my story. I’m sorry to Kiyoshi Morgan and Lily, my children. I wish this never happened but, trust me when I say that this world we are told we live in is not as it appears. There is a nefarious group of people who do NOT have your best interests in mind. The main stream of bogus media, news reporting etc. is b.s. It is propaganda. We are living in a lie. Their manufactured lie. Don’t let it fool you. I did. I’m sorry.

Shellen alerts the public to the covert program, despite most people preferring the comfort of their own fantasy world that excludes targets as cruelly as during the German Nazi and East German postwar eras. The crime, employing many of the same odd acts used today was called Zersetzung.

Read NSA Whistleblower: US Has Created Nazi Germany Worldwide

The Stasi considered the ‘measures of Zersetzung’… as an instrument used when judiciary procedures were not convenient, or for political reasons… (Wikipedia) Odd gas lighting, trashing targets’ front yards or businesses during the night, unforced break-ins and “gang” (multi-) stalking were among the long list of tactics employed to persecute targets, instill fear, ruin their careers and worse. Multi-stalking in the US today is listed in official stalking data reports as being on the rise more than any other type stalking.

Zersetzung transferred to the FBI in the United States when Operation Paperclip brought some of the worst Nazis to America. Immediately, these Nazis formed an official partnership with American intelligence agents to form the CIA, that in turn, partnered with the FBI. Zersetzung became the FBI’s Cointelpro (Counter Intelligence Program) to be employed against any threat to the corrupt status quo. The FBI admitted during the Church Committee congressional investigation to covertly “targeting individuals” to ruin their lives. This involves, among other tactics, a concerted attempt to assassinate the target’s character by an organized, but not fully identified group of individuals, many of whom are paid with cash, drugs or other commodities the perpetrators desire.

The shadowy government, that Shellen calls Illuminati, has had over four decades to refine the targeting program. With official sources, including intelligence agencies and DARPA, it has had over 40 years to add technological means to injure targets. This includes weapons the average person knows nothing or little about, finding it far more comfortable to deny their existence and call the victim insane to their face or in rumors to others. In other words, cognitive dissonance kicks in.

Festinger’s (1957) cognitive dissonance theory suggests that humans have an inner drive to hold all personal attitudes and beliefs in harmony and to avoid all disharmony (or dissonance) – such as that innocent people in the family or neighborhood are being targeted in weird, injurious ways. Festinger proposed cognitive dissonance theory, stating that a powerful motive to maintain cognitive consistency can give rise to irrational and sometimes maladaptive behavior — the type of sick behavior TIs’ families and friends exhibit when made privvy to torture that TIs experience, rather than demonstrating compassion and protection.

Cognitive dissonance was first investigated by Leon Festinger after observing a study of a cult that believed the earth was going to be destroyed by a flood, and what happened to its members — particularly the really committed ones who had given up homes and job to work for the cult — when the flood did not happen.

Fringe members were more inclined to recognize they had made fools of themselves and “put it down to experience.” Committed members, however, were more likely to re-interpret evidence to show they were right all along: (The earth was not destroyed due to  faithfulness of the cult members). (Cognitive Dissonance Theory, Simply Psychology)

The result of cognitive dissonance regarding TIs? People who know the TI attempt to maintain their own harmony of personal values, although in these cases warped (because it is delusional-based, believing such weird evil cannot exist and certainly not close to home). They therefore act as though the complaining target is mentally ill. Likewise, media reporters, under orders from the top, do their crucial part in discrediting the complaining target. Many professionals, including those in the justice and health systems, are no help. Many know about targeting but will not risk becoming targeted by defending a TI. One specialist recently explained to Dupré: “You’d be surprised how political the health department is.” These acts support perpetrators’ precise and ultimate desire: for the target to be declared genetically sick, that is, with a congenital mental deficiency warranting exclusion, institionalization and possibly, extermination.

“After more than 14 years of trying in vain to unravel what happened to my children and my life, and after traveling around both the U.S. and Canada seeking out different wise individuals who, thank God, were inclined to both listen to the kinds of harassment I had experienced and offer advice, well…here we go,” stated Shellen.

TIs live with the fact that most people prefer to not knowing ugly truth, to not ask questions, to instead live in a state of denial about the TI phenomenon. This allows the crime to expand, and cripple — even loved ones. It is easier and safer to do so, they think, thus aiding the spreading of the crime. Shine a light on roaches and they run for their lives. Shellen is shining a light on the criminals targeting individuals.

“If anyone out there desires clues or is simply interested enough to pull back the sheets of hypocrisy and have a closer look inside Pandora’s Box, check out all you can on Ritual Abuse, mind programming[, ]surveillance harassment, child kidnapping and organized child prostitution…”

About Actor Stephen Shellen

To embark on his acting career, Shellen moved from Canada to England and became an extremely successful model. From London he moved to Los Angeles, studying with Peggy Feury. Soon, casting agents signed him to his feature film contracts. His feature debut was in the 1982 film Spring Fever. For five years, he was cast in made-for-TV movies. He had a strong role in Hollywood Wives in 1985 with Anthony Hopkins, Candice Bergen and Robert Stack. Two years later, he was a regular on Cameo by Night. By the late 1980s, he held many impressive movie roles like Modern Girls, The Stepfather and Casual Sex with Lea Thompson and Victoria Jackson. Increasingly, Shellen worked on more important projects. He was in the pilot for Murder One. He returned to Canada in the early 1990s for the lead in Counterstrike with Christopher Plummer and Simon MacCorkindale fighting global terrorism. In the U.S., Shellen starred and won critical raves in the hostage crisis film April One. He appeared in Robert Redford’s Academy Award-winning A River Runs Through It. Newsweek magazine referred to his scenes with Susan Trawley as the funniest sequence in that movie.

Shellen’s career progressed to include big-budget, box-office winners, like The Bodyguard with Kevin Costner and Whitney Houston, and small critically acclaimed independent films, such as Rude, named Best Canadian Feature Film at Toronto International Film Festival 1995 and winner of eight Genie nominations.

In 1997, Shellen in Toronto, he was in what was to be a one-time appearance on La Femme Nikita, playing a dedicated police detective. He was a hit with fans, so LFN brought him back in a recurring role for the series’ fifth and final season. Shellen was cast to be in the hit Nicholas Cage/Angelina Jolie film Gone in 60 Seconds.

Since targeted, Shellen’s acting career plummetted int ruination. Like most TIs who manage to find work amid a workplace mobbing sophisticated black-ball process, his talents and skills are wasted. Shellen now works in the demolition business. He is, however, more important than an actor now. He is a genuine voice for millions of voiceless TIs.

Sources: IMBd, Northern Star Toronto, YouTube, Victurus Libertas VL - The freedom to live VL.

Related Articles Written by Deborah Dupré

Are You a Targeted Individual? Foolproof Research Criteria Secrets

 

Jade Helm Terror Brutality Already Crippling Targeted Individuals: Aussie Confesses Darkest Secrets

Another Nightmarish Targeted Individual Conspiracy Theory Confirmed

Activist Sandra Bland Death Investigation Explodes: Top Officials’ Documented with History of Targeting Blacks

TI Landmark Victory: Secret Mind Control Human Rights Abuses of Targeted Individuals Exposed on TV News

Obama’s Secret State-Sponsored Brutality toward Targeted Individuals

Child Sexual Abuse Signs You See So Often, You’ll Be Shocked

Mind Control Pedophilia VIP Ring Survivor: ‘Cops Stood Guard As I Was Raped By Politicians’ (New Video)

Explosive VIP Pedophilia Scandal: ‘I Know Every Inch of Him’: Esther Baker About Politician [Video Might Be Unsuitable For Children]

Exposed! U.S. Gestapo Licensed To Ruin TI Lives

TI Evidence: Corporate Pays Law Enforcement Special Ops To Target Individuals

Gov’t Surveillance is for Terrorists to Target Innocent People, Spy Specialist Confirms



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 40 comments
    • Deborah Dupre

      With much gratitude to Stephen Shellen. His plea is bold and greatly needed. This is how rape was finally criminalized. Women who reported rape were once immediately dismissed as mentally ill. Doctors knew dang well they were not as did court judges, but they went along with the lie to save themselves from their own misdeeds with women. Not until enough women organized and protested and demanded justice did rape at least become a crime.
      TIs have needed a strong poster person. It appears that Mr. Shellen is becoming that person. Thank heavens for him, for his courage, his time and his honesty.

      • Cintus Supremus

        “Women who reported rape were once immediately dismissed as mentally ill.”

        Oh? During what time period did that ever happen?

        Links? Citations? Substance?

        • Deborah Dupre

          Gloria (sorry forget last name) wrote a book on this. I had citations in the over 300 articles s rubbed from the net last year when Examiner folded in the middle of the night. We’re working on retrieving them – but we’re talking less than 50 years ago. Then, rapists typically were not even questioned.
          If you want a recent link, just check out this: “In Newport News and Williamsburg-James City, 5 percent of reported rapes lead to criminal conviction.” http://www.dailypress.com/news/crime/dp-nws-rape-convictions-20150529-story.html
          “13-Year-Old’s Rape Case Dismissed Because Her Body Is ‘Well-Developed’”
          “A Swedish court acquitted a 27-year-old man of raping a 13-year-old girl because she looked older. Add this to similar cases in the U.S. and U.K., and we’ve got a sickening problem…. “Add to this the Montana judge who dismissed a 14-year-old girl as “older than her chronological age” after she was raped by her 47-year-old teacher, and therein lies a very bleak picture of our attitudes toward young victims of sexual assault.

          The regular refrain espoused by prosecutors and judges—that these girls seem beyond their years, and therefore cannot benefit from the protective laws afforded to others of their age group—is a paltry excuse. Either we design legislation to protect people or we don’t, but denying someone the legal justice they deserve because their chest is a little bigger than average is frankly embarrassing. If the law won’t safeguard these girls, who will?”
          “There comes a time when we must ask ourselves why blame keeps being placed on young women…. shouldn’t a man in his 40s, who is in an even greater position of power by way of being that girl’s teacher, be the one to demonstrate what is right and wrong? Dealing with personal distress is one thing, but sleeping with your pre-legal student because your wife has just miscarried simply should not be an alibi we find acceptable.

          This constant misdirection of fault is a stain on punitive justice worldwide.” [http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/12/13-year-old-s-rape-case-dismissed-because-her-body-is-well-developed.html]
          Now – Now substitute most of the above “girls” with TIs – and rape with assaults and man with TI’s perpetrator .. and hopefully, you get the picture.

        • Deborah Dupre

          I think it was Gloria Allred: http://www.gloriaallred.com/About-Ms-Allred/
          Allred is author of “Fight Back and Win: My Thirty-Year Fight Against Injustice — And How You Can Win Your Own Battles.”

          And then, there’s “The Story of Jane Doe– a raped woman’s account of the crime committed against her and her subsequent, Herculean legal battle against the investigating police–it’s hard to believe we live in the 21st century. …statistics presented amid Jane’s harrowing personal experience are startling: one in four Canadian women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. Her personal effects (sex toys, for instance) and past history can be used to discredit her. Certain rapes can be classified as non-violent. And yet women in Canada can’t actually file rape charges. Charges have to be sourced by the police and filed by a Crown attorney, giving the police enormous power. Handled poorly, as in the case of “Jane Doe” and other women brutalized in the summer of 1986 by Toronto’s so-called “Balcony Rapist,” that power leads to institutionalized sexism and extreme trauma for the victim.
          “But thanks to Jane Doe and her landmark case against the Toronto police force–who neglected to warn women of a serial rapist in their midst despite knowing his MO, thus using them as bait–we also see that sometimes wrongs are righted, or at least brought to light… The Story of Jane Doe is equal parts life story, battle cry for change, crime drama, detailed account of a civil trial unlike any other, and sad exposé of the myths that stubbornly surround rape victims. As Jane tells it, the social and emotional rape begins when the physical one ends. The injustices routinely dealt to rape victims are infuriating to read, but Jane–articulate, darkly funny, and deeply conversant in her subject–compels us.
          “In Ontario, only four per cent of all reported rapes that reach trial result in guilty convictions. Does that stat sound too low for your comfort level? Okay, let’s increase it just for the sake of argument. Make it 20 percent, 30 per cent. Hell, make it 50 per cent. If only half of all charges reported result in convictions, something is very wrong. At four per cent, we have disaster, farce, permission to rape.”

          Now, please substitute “rape victims” in the above with “TI victims.”

          • Cintus Supremus

            Per your citations, let’s see:

            From the headline of the linked-to article…

            “…5 percent of reported rapes lead to criminal conviction…”

            Let’s compare that with your premise:

            “Women who reported rape were once immediately dismissed as mentally ill.”

            Nothing doing so far. Let us read on.

            “A Swedish court acquitted a 27-year-old man of raping a 13-year-old girl because she looked older.”

            Nothing doing here either. The sort of injustice described here happens even to this day in non-Western and ‘third-world’ nations. But this isn’t the phenomenon you claim in your premise. Not even close.

            “Add this to similar cases in the U.S. and U.K., and we’ve got a sickening problem…”

            Had you made exactly this unembellished point initially, would I have challenged you? I would not have. Compare your premise with your argument now – once you have removed hyperbole and outlandishness from your argument. Do you see where this takes us?

            “…a very bleak picture of our attitudes toward young victims of sexual assault.”

            Again, stated correctly, there is no room for a reasonable person to argue with your point.

            From here you proceed to fill your post (and a follow-up) with material, but you fail to take even a single step toward supporting your premise. And Ms. Dupree? Once you’ve been called out on a hyperbolic charge, you ought never come to the table with stories about 300 presently inaccessible articles you wrote in the past – thereby insinuating you once had supporting evidence, but the dog ate your homework. There’s just no point in doing that ever; but it is especially ruinous to your cause once you’ve been called on hyperbole.

            The cause is legitimate. But your argument needs to be stated with prudence, lest you do a terrible disservice to those you labor to assist by interjecting a profound weakness into the dialogue, which cannot be substantiated and which can be used to your detriment by your ideological opponents.

            • Deborah Dupre

              Oh good. Thank you so very much Cintus, for making more of an issue about this. Here are citations that might interest you – and I’ll keep trying to locate the book with records of judges tossing out rape cases due to the women raped being “hysterical” (mentally ill):

              “Stretching back to at least as early as 1900 B.C., when ancient Egyptians attributed hysterics to the misplacement of the womb, women’s reproductive systems have been linked with irrational emotions. (The term “hysteria” comes from the Greek hystera, which literally means uterus.) Since then, the notion of female hysteria has persisted, often as a method of deploying health professionals to keep women in line. During the 1800s, for example, the women who attempted to rebel against the Victorian-era domestic expectations for their gender were labeled hysterical and placed in mental asylums and, in some extreme cases, were forced to have hysterectomies.
              “In the 1970s, feminist critiques of the health care system started to connect the dots and expose the role that sexism can play in the doctor’s office.

              “I think it’s the same deeply rooted sexism that we see in other realms, like when it comes to not believing rape survivors. We don’t trust women to be the experts on their own bodies, or to be reliable narrators of their own lives,” Maya Dusenbery, the editorial executive director at Feministing and the author of a recent piece about gender bias in health care, told ThinkProgress. “But when that comes into the medical system, it’s really dangerous.”… https://thinkprogress.org/when-gender-stereotypes-become-a-serious-hazard-to-womens-health-f1f130a5e79

              Here – you might also appreciate this one:
              Personal Health
              Military Women Who Speak out About Sexual Assault Are Being Branded With ‘Personality Disorder’ and Pushed Out. Noxious stereotypes about women being nuts and liars are being used to silence military women who report rape. As all too many rape victims discover when they speak out, many react by just wishing the victim would shut up and go away…. (Human Rights Watch turned up alarming evidencethat, in the military, forces that want to shut accusers up and make them go away have found a disturbingly potent weapon: Misogynist stereotypes. By leaning on prejudiced beliefs that women, especially outspoken women, are either dishonest or crazy, the military was able to get rid of women who came forward with rape accusations.”) http://www.alternet.org/personal-health/military-women-who-report-rape-are-being-silenced

              And finally, I recalled the name of the book and author I mentioned earlier about including excellent information about women, rape, courts five decades ago being too similar today, that is, rape cases dismissed and the victim suffering revictimization by being labeled hysterical or mentally ill: Rethinking Rape by Ann Cahill, Cornell University Press: http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100559980

              You see, nearly all rape laws are based on distorted viewpoints involving misrepresentations of women and the perpetrator

              Please see this Guardian article related to what we discuss here:
              “”That is simply not true…”

              “You are indulging in the realms of fantasy…”

              “Utter fantasy, is it not?”

              “This is a lie…”

              “What you have told this jury is a complete pack of lies…”

              “The cross-examination of Frances Andrade, who was in the witness box over indecent assault allegations against her former music teacher, Michael Brewer, makes very uncomfortable reading when you know that a few days after her court appearance she killed herself.

              “Three days before her death, Andrade texted a friend to say that she felt as if she had been “raped all over again” [revictimized] as Brewer’s barrister, Kate Blackwell, attempted to undermine her testimony. Her son, Oliver, told a newspaper how profoundly the cross-examination had affected her. ‘As soon as she came out of the courtroom, she just burst into tears,’ he said. ‘She had tried so hard not to do it in front of the jury. She described it as feeling as if she had been assaulted all over again. All that she could think was that she was being attacked. She found that extremely hard.’
              Brewer was eventually found guilty of five counts of indecent assault. But during her time in the witness box, Andrade was very clear about the effect that the aggressive tone of questioning would have. ‘This is why cases don’t come forward,’ she told the QC. ‘I am not in the realms of fantasy [mentally ill - psychotic, delusional...] and I really understand why so many cases have not come to court.’ [Note: she's describing the judge and others questioning her sanity.]

              “The home secretary, Theresa May, acknowledged the point in an interview after Andrade’s death, and said the fallout from the case could have a very negative effect. ‘I fear that others may be put off from coming forward rather than encouraged,’ she said. [Cahill shows this is exactly what happens: women fail to even report rape knowing they will be revictimized with insinuations they are mentally ill.]

              “Other rape and sexual assault victims who have tried, with various degrees of success, to take cases to court are familiar with the distressing experience of having their evidence torn apart. Usually when you report a crime, you expect to be believed. Victims of burglary do not have to prove that they have been burgled or to justify their behaviour before the burglary. With rape and sexual assault allegations, victims still find themselves subjected to hostile questioning.” https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/apr/13/rape-sexual-assault-frances-andrade-court.

              With all due respect, I doubt any TI victim would say today that I do or have done a terrible disservice to them. Again, however, thank you for your time and for the opportunity to elaborate on the similarities between rape and TI victims.

            • Paul Brown

              You clearly like to play the pedant just to look superior, not to do anything useful. What a tiresome creep, you don’t look superior, you look pathetic.

            • Paul Brown

              My comment was for the ditz who calls himself supremus. What gall.

            • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

              You call out gall?
              Yet you champion global warming?
              THAT’S GALL!!!
              DITZ!!!

            • Cintus Supremus

              Ms. Dupre,

              Does pointing to the historical sources of the term ‘hysterectomy’ support your argument that ‘women who reported rape were once immediately dismissed as mentally ill’? Absolutely not. Have you drawn a clear connection with your citation and your premise with the material you quoted? Absolutely not. The closest you’ve come is an OPINION voiced by Maya Dusenbery who herself begins the sentence you quoted by saying: “I think…”

              Secondly, you point to military culture. Had you said originally ‘women in the military who reported rape were once immediately dismissed as mentally ill’ you would have had a firmer ground to stand on. That isn’t what you said.

              “…excellent information about women, rape, courts five decades ago…

              And this differs from modern courtroom proceedings, wherein defense attorneys will craft their defense by using any and all means at their disposal (most certainly to include lying), how, exactly?

              “You see, nearly all rape laws are based on distorted viewpoints…”

              (Bold added. You see Ms. Dupree how when I alter, even slightly, the body of a quotation, I make a very plain and conspicuous point to highlight that fact? More on this in a minute.)

              Now would have been a good time to cite a few of these ‘distorted’ (so-called) rape laws to demonstrate your point – don’t you think? But no. You would rather preface your claim with yet more hyperbole, by accusing ‘nearly all’ rape laws with being grossly unfair to women.

              “But during her time in the witness box, Andrade was very clear about the effect that the aggressive tone of questioning would have.”

              Criminal proceedings are notoriously difficult for the victims of crimes, Ms. Dupre. No one is arguing otherwise. You’re attempting to piece together a defense of your premise by pointing to aspects of society I never denied. But if your premise were true, it would be easy to demonstrate.

              Now THIS:

              “[Cahill shows this is exactly what happens: women fail to even report rape knowing they will be revictimized with insinuations they are mentally ill.]”

              It is interesting to note that this bracketed insertion – which does NOT appear in the article you cited – was included by you in such a way as to make it unclear whether or not the insertion does appear in the cited article. Since you included the insertion WITHIN quotation marks, but you did NOT mention that the insertion was NOT a part of the original article, you give your readers to understand that it was a part of the original article. That is deceptive, Ms. Dupree. And it is ONLY this portion of your cited material that I moved to investigate, to see whether it was included with the original material on the strong suspicion that it was not. While it is true that brackets indicate an insertion is not part of the original text, brackets in this case may well have existed in the original article. As you well know. And because they did not, you should have indicated as much by clearly stating that the bracketed insertion was yours. But you didn’t. You merely inserted your argument into the quotation in such a way as to sow (I would say intentionally) confusion.

              Another quote from your citation:

              “With rape and sexual assault allegations, victims still find themselves subjected to hostile questioning.”

              Stated without hyperbole. Compare this with your premise. One is ostensibly fact-based while the other is here being challenged because it is not.

              “With all due respect, I doubt any TI victim would say today that I do or have done a terrible disservice to them.”

              I’m discussing rape victims with you, Ms. Dupre. The entire conversation between us has been a divergence from the topic of ‘Targeted Individuals’ and, to clarify, my above comment about disservice should be understood in that light.

            • Cintus Supremus

              Hi Doc.

              Have anything to bring to this conversation besides background noise?

            • Cintus Supremus

              Follow-up to Ms. Dupre,

              Re your use of brackets –

              Since the article you quoted only uses parentheses and does not ever use brackets, and since you had earlier used brackets (according to the rules) in the above quoted material making it fairly obvious that the commentary was yours, I withdraw my criticism of your inserted commentary as well as my charge of intentional deception.

              The remainder of my argument stands.

      • Angie from VL

        I am Angie from Victurus Libertas – the one interviewing Stephen Shellen in the video you put into this article. It appears you did not approve my last comment. I request you email me at [email protected]

    • Boo

      Wonderful actor I miss his presence in films. He always carried the plot line to it’s best viewing pleasure for the audience. Hopefully, it can open and intelligent dialogue on the parasitical side of this issue that has infiltrated and scarred so many in the film industry. If this were GM or Microsoft everyone would be up in arms at how debased these industry’s have become. Maybe it’s time to notice Hollywood for the parasite it has been reduced to and throw off it’s slide into perversion. Can we see a movie someday soon again where we walk out feeling uplifted instead of being mentally raped and abused?

      • Deborah Dupre

        Thank you, Boo.
        As for watching a film that is uplifting… I have a list of them if you care for me to share them. They’re out there. It just takes a heck of a lot of searching, which I’ve done and would be happy to share.

        • Boo

          I believe the first time I saw him was in his role as Neal in a River Runs Through It. Beautiful man.

          • Deborah Dupre

            Yes, his actions of late are demonstrating just what a beautiful person he is. TIs see him as an answer to prayers.

          • Anonymous

            The worm fisherman?

    • DISPENSER

      THEY must have really done a job on this Hollywood Star!!! I’ve never heard of him. Never knew THEY had that type of power.

      • Deborah Dupre

        Thank you for reading this. Yes, the perps did do a job on Shellen. While you might not recognize the name, you’ve probably seen him in films, at the very least, TV movies. If no other in the long list of Shellen movies, Robert Redford’s “River Runs Through It” is surely worth the view to see Shellen in action.

    • Pink Slime

      Yes, yes, I don’t understand one word what you are talking about here! :neutral:

    • Black Humor

      Dear Ms Dupre, these kind of storys, when put in a larger context, underline clearly the dangers of not only big government, but also it’s institutions functioning with impunity. Although I believe ”being targeted” is reserved to people whom might be in position to make a difference and ”warning example” is required, there are far more common ways to deal with troublesome individuals.
      In London ”spyboys” were training pickpockets to slip things in to peoples pockets(drugs/childporn memory cards etc.). They chose to slip 50 pound notes to tourists. Naturally many of them got caught and because people thought it was counterfitted money and they were abused as guineapigs, authoritys were called. Chief of police actually had to make public announcement that ”these people were former pickpockets with bad conscience, whom just wanted to atone by giving back…”
      If someone believes a group of lottery winning pickpockets whom found Jesus is plausible, well…
      Interesting article. :cool:

      • Deborah Dupre

        Black,
        Thank you. Yes, particularly glad to see you mention corporations’ involvement. Most large corps have their own brand of mercenaries these days, for example, as seen during BP oil spill and more recently, the DAPL pipeline abuses. Many TIs contacting me trace their targeting back to working for a large corporation and bringing misconduct/corruption to the attention of superiors. From that day forward, they are harassed, stalked, assaulted in various ways to make their lives miserable.
        Very interesting story about the 50 pound notes, especially that an abundance of complaints forced official attention. TI complaints alone cannot remedy this, but if their families and friends dared complain in defense of TIs, perhaps then officials would have to address this. Until then, it is a corporate government sponsored crime with impunity.

    • Syrin

      The most targeted individual is without a doubt Trump followed by conservative media members everywhere who need your support to stop the wave of leftist fascist censorship and subsequent violence. Meanwhile, 60 blacks take over and rob a train in Oakland, and the media is silent.

      • Deborah Dupre

        Syrin, Your statement is simply untrue. Historically and today, as records show, it is the conservative element that targets to destroy lives, to, as it is referred, to maintain the status quo – as conservatives work to do. Check your history and see Cointelpro was a right-wing-created and supported operation to silence progress, people working for human and civil rights, people wanting peace instead of war profits… Inserting a comment about blacks is as out of context as the price of tea in China and thus appears very racist, and thus, unacceptable.

        • DISPENSER

          It is historically the leftist who insist upon ruling every aspect of your life, and targeting and killing the opposition. Stalin, Mao, and depending on you viewpoint Hitler were leftest. It is currently the leftist shutting down free speech, wearing black mask, and attacking conservatives. If you want to talk about actors being targeted, you could start with any open conservative in Hollywood.

        • Boo

          Deb…there are nefarious dudes on both sides of the fence. The problem is the left side is not the left side that was around when Kennedy was President. Step outside of this box the Players try to get us to step into … don’t look at who said what, but look at what was said or done. Then wait for it … the epiphany’s will astound you. Dispenser and you could both be right…

          • Deborah Dupre

            Yes, Boo. I agree, just as I know the Dems and Republicans are basically the same corporate-driven profiteering parties now. There are, however, progressives, people driven to see humanity develop instead of becoming less developed, to work for peace instead of more war.
            By the way, whatever the right likes to call “liberals’ has me stumped. That term is never used as a synonym of progressives. In that regard, Dispenser and I are poles apart.

    • dennisR8

      Hollywood does need a take down even the comedic actor Jim Carey, from Dumb and Dumber, has said the same thing.

      Hollywood is run by evil people, that are also pedophiles. A hard take down, face first to the pavement, required.

    • OBSERVER

      http://www.us-government-torture.com/
      http://www.us-government-torture.com/
      http://www.us-government-torture.com/
      http://www.us-government-torture.com/

      Dear Reader,
      For those of you who innocently do not believe that the government is actively experimenting on the public at large may I draw yor attention to the following :
      SPEECH BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE
      “Mr. GLENN. Madam President, if I approached any Senator here and I said, ‘‘You did
      not know it, but the last time they went to the doctor or went to the hospital, your wife or
      your husband or your daughter or your son became the subject of a medical experiment
      that they were not even told about. They were given medicine, they were given pills, they
      were given radiation, they were given something and were not even told about this,
      were not even informed about it, yet they are under some experimental research that
      might possibly do them harm—maybe some good will come out of it, but maybe it will
      do them harm also—but they do not know about it,’’ people would laugh at that and
      say that is ridiculous. That cannot possibly happen in this country. Yet, that very
      situation is what this piece of legislation is supposed to address….”
      —- United States Senator John Glenn.
      “Congressional Record S645 January 22,
      1997”, prior to becoming a Senator he
      was the first American to circle the Earth
      in outer space in 1962.

      • Deborah Dupre

        Observer. Thank you. Yes, Senator Glenn tried to warn Americans about the shadowy government experimenting on Americans without their knowledge or consent. He explained the corporate government gets away with it because of there being far too many loopholes in the laws that ban this Nazi practice. Our men died fighting this type of Nazi abuse, yet Americans are allowing such torture on its own soil now. Go figure.

        Isn’t this one way the perpetrators can get away with torturing targeted individuals? Under the banner of non-consensual human experimentation?

        Here’s the deal though: all abuses being used to experiment on controlling lives of today’s targets (and ruining lives of those who resist) will bit by bit sooner or later be used on the entire population – for the same reason, 100% control. Remember the ultimate aim of the military, as stated by chief of staff: Full Spectrum Dominance – 100% control of all land, air, and sea including all inhabitants, and that includes all humans.

    • diane

      Yes, this has happen to me. Directed energy weapons, poisons, use of chemicals. Also implants, and stalking.

    • OBSERVER

      SPEECH BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SENATE
      “Mr. GLENN. Madam President, if I approached any Senator here and I said, ‘‘You did
      not know it, but the last time they went to the doctor or went to the hospital, your wife or
      your husband or your daughter or your son became the subject of a medical experiment
      that they were not even told about. They were given medicine, they were given pills, they
      were given radiation, they were given something and were not even told about this,
      were not even informed about it, yet they are under some experimental research that
      might possibly do them harm—maybe some good will come out of it, but maybe it will
      do them harm also—but they do not know about it,’’ people would laugh at that and
      say that is ridiculous. That cannot possibly happen in this country. Yet, that very
      situation is what this piece of legislation is supposed to address….”
      —- United States Senator John Glenn.
      “Congressional Record S645 January 22,
      1997”, prior to becoming a Senator he
      was the first American to circle the Earth
      in outer space in 1962.
      http://www.us-government-torture.com/

    • Angie from VL

      Deborah, My name is Angie. My husband and I own the channel Victurus Libertas, from which you took the interview video in this article. We are trying to give some exposure to Targeted Individuals and help the public know it exists. We are interviewing Dr. Katherine Horton this weekend, who has also been targeted. I am interested in getting in touch with the Private Investigator you speak of in this article, William Taylor. Would you happen to be willing to give me contact info on him? [email protected]. Thanks

    • David Shurter

      My name is David Shurter- I have a blog DavidShurter.com and I am being targeted for trying to expose the child trafficking ring that my family was a part of in Omaha, NE.

      Here are some of my videos- I have been doing them daily since they started killing me with their weapons 6 weeks ago. I have A LOT of info on how these things work.

      This link not only has my video- but ALSO a pic the weapon and the documention from the Air Force admitting that these weapons exist and that they planned to use them on American citizens in 2006= which they told Congress- to show the rest of the world that they were safe. THEY ARE NOT SAFE…

      http://davidshurter.com/?p=8026 New Video April 27, 2017

      No the Targetting Has MOST DEFINITELY Has Not Stopped-They Don’t Want My Parent’s Family Investigated for Killing Children

      This is my YouTube channel detailing what I have been doing and going through…

      https://www.youtube.com/user/DavidShurter1/videos

      we must all stand together.

    • misc_CIA_Victim

      I’m a TI, targeted by the FBI. This started after I voluntarily went to the FBI with a tip about serious crimes, based on info I had from sources I met online. I didn’t realize at the time that these online sources were actually CIA slaves, and that knowing/reporting any CIA crime in the US is a sure one-way ticket to an FBI hell hole that most people never come out of. Part of the abuse – which is tactically clever – starts with the FBI lying to local police and ex-relatives that the target, me, is some kind of delusional lunatic. When I went to the FBI for an interview, we had ZERO discussions about any perceptions or any sort of criteria that a actual doctor would begin an exam with. I simply told them about the info I had gotten online, not even knowing if they would investigate it or take it seriously. I had no idea that this action, which I thought was part of being a good citizen, would turn out to be essentially signing my own death warrant.

      I’ve been attacked in a lot of ways, but about 6 months after it started, they settled on the use of non-lethal DEW weapons. I now have 3+ years of fighting/counteracting those, and I would like to share the things I’ve learned with other people. However, another part of the abuse I experience is FBI/NSA intercepts of all my communications. I don’t mean just spying, which would be relatively insignificant as I have nothing to hide and no ability to hide. I mean intercepts so that the communications don’t go through or I get false responses. They call it a “box” or a “park” or a “ding” or an “ass kill” (it turns out that that the FBI is run by sadistic same-sex men and as part of their cover for that they like to tell absurd/baseless lies about the sexuality of the people they target for death).

      If anyone wants to follow up for more info, via e-mail or Twitter you are welcome to try. However, I doubt you will actually reach me. You may get some absurd response instead that is made to sound like a lunatic. But if you do reach me, I can share technical details on the type of non-lethal DEW weapons the FBI is using on TIs nowadays.

    • Anonymous

      The kike’s anit shat in a Shiites backyard.

    • Randal

      Something you should all know: Many of these people/Actors/Musicians and other high profile people involved are mind control victims themselves. things they are forced to do like sleep with kids or other things that would make you sick is not who they are or were in the beginning. Some of them don’t mind it and don’t require drugging to get them to do things but a majority of them were abused to the point their mind was split into different personalities.
      I know all the actors in Hollywood as well as most of the pop stars and rock musicians.
      Everybody in Hollywood knows who I am even if we haven’t met.
      My story started in 1980. in 1981 I was the guy who carried the nuclear briefcase when Reagan was shot.
      The Illuminati or freemasons are what they call themselves. I was 16 years old when I carried the briefcase. it was separated from Reagan purposely. they took it from me at the police station and used it to force Reagan to give control of the US – China trade agreement to Bush Sr. all the shit Stephon is talking about is true.
      I am planning on going public with my story like Steve has only I know all the players and those behind everything.

    • charles

      To Block Psycotronic Signal :

      I have been harassed with psycotronically for 15 years (gas lighted and poisoned also ) ,But by using 6 groups (2 mags drawn together over fabric cradle will hold the mags in position ) of neodymium magnets ( about 10 mm dia and 3-4 mm thick each mag— these mag are very strong ) placed around my head two on the sides of temples one at back of head And then another 3 groups around the top of the skull crown off set by 180 degrees , so the lot would form a star of david if viewed from above .
      The polarity for the bottom array needs to be + – front ,then back either – or +
      But the top array needs to be offset so as to create an unstable magnetic field , whick I assume prevents entrainment , this is important or the it doesn’t work properly So :
      For the top array – or + for front group , then the back two groups needs to be + and – .
      This definitely block/ interfers with the psycotronic signal so that even though I can hear the hiss , I don’t get the entrainement effect . Another set of mags can be placed at the crown for even more complete effect .
      I’m forced to sleep with this and wear all day .
      I have tried crystals and they help ameliorate the effect (natrolite worn close to the throat chakra , closes the third eye which prevents heart chakra attack ; but I can’t say how this part works …? )

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.