Moon Hoax 2017 Update! New Evidence Shows Massive Cover up Must See!
Accidental proof Rockets dont work in space ( Another Hoax by NASA): A must see
NASA – how to fake space badly in 1983 – GREAT find by Geoshifter – Flat Earth
Another NASA ISS Green Screen FAIL – International Space Station Hoax
NASA is a fraud – Space bubbles 10 Times In Space Videos From NASA
Philosophers stone – selected views from the boat http://philosophers-stone.co.uk
Source: http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/?p=19741
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,603,458,547 |
| Stories: | 8,150,148 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
Just put a firework in a vacuum chamber and see how they don’t burn. Compressed air would make more sense to manouver anything in space?
Spacecraft use hypergolic fuels that contain oxygen and can therefore ignite spontaneously even in a vacuum.
Their is a video, think it is a Go Pro rocket that was sent up, with cameras pointing down and in that video if you start and stop it, the rocket starts to become Translucent to where you can see inside the rocket itself as it goes upwards
Why does it become Translucent?
There is no “hoax” there is just those who are too stupid to comprehend NASA lies to you and those who have done some basic research and caught them lying constantly. There are two space programs. One which boasts of obsolete fossil fuels and the reality where Electra-Magnetics move humans instantaneously to the required location in multiple universes instantaneously.
been building (solid propellant) rocket engines for decades, they work under water and in space
I’ve often wondered about that.
Doesn’t matter how much hot gases coming out the back of a rocket, if there’s nothing back there to push against, like a launch pad or an atmosphere, where’s the drive coming from?
Eg: If space is a vacuum, or Close to it….there’s nothing to push against. How fast has the rocket exhaust gas have to be travelling to overcome the natural suction of the exterior vacuum, before it achieves any thrust at all?.. but no one else was querying anything so I had another bourbon or ten and went back to trying my luck with the cheerleader closest the fence. (Whoa…lucky I can’t lip read.)
there doesn’t need to be anything to “push against” because the pushing is done to the exhaust gasses themselves – if you apply 2 million horsepower to the exhaust gasses to PUSH them out of the engine, then Newtons Third Law of motions tells us that exact same force is being applied to the vehicle
same thing with a boat, you pick up a large stone and PUSH it out the back, the force you applied to the stone is the exact same force applied to the boat and so the boat moves – there doesn’t have to be anything for the stone to push against, because you are applying the force to the stone, not whatever’s behind it
the booster rockets on the space shuttle gain 2 million horsepower in space, because there is considerably less “back pressure” which results from having to move an atmosphere out of the way
I tried to explain this concept to flat Earth people on a different site and they just couldn’t grasp it. I don’t agree with your beliefs in the Bible, but I think we at least have some common ground in this arena. All of these things can be tested here on Earth, and have been, in vacuum chambers.
Obviously if matter is expelled out of the back of the rocket, it will expand in all directions, including the direction opposite to which the rocket is going and vise versa, propelling it forward. Since there is no friction to slow it down, every burst will allow an increase in speed. I don’t get what people don’t understand about that.
As far as gravity goes, I’m not too sure on the existing theory. Personally I think the electric universe theory is more viable. If I were to hold a small magnet to a piece of metal of a certain size, the magnet itself wins out over the gravity of the Earth because the magnet can overpower the supposed “gravity.” I think that either gravity is a very, very weak force, or what we consider to be gravity is actually magnetism produced by the Earth. If what I’m saying is correct though, the magnetism of the Earth as it pertains to the area of Earth humans inhabit would also have to be somewhat weak in comparison to a small magnet.
???
i’ve had similar “fun” attempting to describe how newtons third law works,, it appears to be beyond the capacity of some to understand that the FORCE you apply to the exhaust gasses to eject them from the engine is the same force applied to the vehicle – that simple
the Electric Universe theory appears to fill most of the gaps in our understanding of cosmology and it demonstrates that gravity “may be” a bye-product of electro-magnetism and a demonstration i saw appears to verify it
a frog was paced in the centre of a very powerful electromagnet and when the juice was turned on, it floated in zero-G
I remember seeing a small glass vacuum chamber experiment in Physics class.
The teacher demonstrated the violent reaction when he released the vacuum by exposing it to air. Since then I have never believed the NASA BS that we can fly high enough so that we go directly from atmosphere to a vacuum. Notice that they never say at what height this magical altitude is.
You cannot just go from atmosphere to a vacuum without having an extremely strong barrier in between.
you really are that dopey huh? air pressure reduces as you go higher, it’s a gradual change from vacuum to one atmosphere over a distance of 300 miles
Your boat is moving because it is pushing off of water that bares some resistance. No resistance or medium in a vacuum so there is nothing to push off of. If what you say is true, we wouldn’t even need tethers on a spacewalking astroNOT. He could just “swim” back to the ship.
no, the boat moves because when i pushed the stone with my hands, my feet pushed the boat in the other direction – the water resists the motion of the boat because it generates FRICTION, which is why the boat doesn’t just keep on going
there is something to push off of in space – the exhaust gasses
i’m guessing your IQ is around 80 & your education entirely lacking
You think me an ignorant fool for believing in the Bible, Andy, but at least i can tell the difference between how propellers work and how Jet engines work.
Mayhem,
Try this as something to think about. Blow up a balloon with air, pinch the nozzle, then walk into a anti-gravitation, vacuum room. Do you think that releasing the nozzle the balloon would just stay there? The air is expelled from the balloon as the balloon is deflating. The air escapes pushing the balloon in the opposite direction.
Mayhem
your comment makes no sense, aside from your admittance to being a fool for believing man-made fairy-tales are actually real
i started repairing cars when i was 5 and am proficient in 5 fields of engineering (mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, electrical & electronics)
would you like to attempt to educate me on how engines work?
Why would i do that, Andy, when i agree with your comments here?
Anonymous was describing how propellers work as a criticism of your analogy about throwing rocks out the back of a boat and you were talking about rockets creating the very atmosphere they need to push against for propulsion.
Mayhaps you’re just being knee jerk defensive because you don’t like how i generally own you in philosophical/theological debates?
Russia and China would have had a field day if they knew that Americans never landed on the moon. They monitored the entire trip. Not only the Russians and Chinese, but tens of thousands of amateur radio operators throughout the world also monitored and recorded the communications and also monitored the entire trip using triangulation (except when the spacecraft traveled behind the moon). Do some research starting with a few amateur radio magazines dated during the times of the Apollo missions. CQ and QST come to mind.
As for rockets in space: take a deep breath, walk into a vaccuum, gravitation-free environment and then blow out. What happens? You’ll move backward. Wherever there is an action there is a reaction.
Exactly. I doubt the guy who wrote this has even taken or passed physics class. This is directly from a simple Google search:
“Rockets and engines in space behave according to Isaac Newton’s third law of motion: Every action produces an equal and opposite reaction. When a rocket shoots fuel out one end, this propels the rocket forward — no air is required”
rockets don’t work in space?? rotflmao isn’t it amazing how ignorance comes up with such spurious crap
You have never actually seen a rocket operate in space. All you have seen is the illusion of movies, yet you believe it.
Can you refute thousands of amateur radio operators monitored the movements of the spacecrafts using triangulation and hundreds of amateur astronomers using their small telescopes to see the spacecrafts in space.
i’ve tested solid propellant rocket engines in a vacuum chamber – what exactly have you done? parrot crap you have absolutely no idea about
Such b.s.
I had no idea that holding a vacuum cleaner up to a straw could “prove” what goes on in space… just think of all the money we wasted doing research.
it was a good simulation and got a lot of kids interested in science they’d be devastated to find out it was a hoax from the get go
I think the author is probably a Bill Nye follower
This might be helpful
/9-11-and-ground-zero/2017/06/what-do-scientology-911-flat-earth-and-911-have-in-common-2442057.html
Rockets can’t work in da space.
Da sun is only 30 miles away from da ‘Erf and is a huge light.
Da stars are just itty bitty points of light behind a yuge black curtai 50 miles away from da ‘Erf.
We ain’t bin to da Moon, which is made of green cheese that no one likes anyways.
Da Moon is only six miles from da ‘Erf with aliens on da dark side of da cheese.
Da ‘Erf is flat. DUH.
Astronomy According To BIN.
New evidence 2017 on the Moon Hoax: Hat’s off to the research job which is in no way amateurish! This research job is so detailed, that NASA itself may have sponsored its own admission to having lied… by feeding its own incriminating evidences. Here is the moral problem: at the end, the video justifies the lies on the ground that “it was during the cold war” and by playing the sympathy card in going as far as praising the actors of the hoax for being “heroes”…
This video marks the start-up of a campaign of apology by NASA. It might work. It is the tactic employed in court-rooms to defend the indefensible. NASA has committed a crime and is about to get away because of pleading “just reasons”. No! It is not possible to accept any compromise. NASA lied about the Moon Landing, and now continue to lie with all its international partners. NASA must be crushed as a snake without any mercy, and if not the fables will continue.