Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By The Pete Santilli Show
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Bundy Ranch: Tyrannical Judge Navarro Declares Americans Have No Rights, and That She Is the Law! (Video)

Monday, July 10, 2017 20:28
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

#BundyRanch: Tyrannical Judge Navarro Declares Americans Have No Rights, And That She Is The Law! (Video)

Las Vegas July 10,2017: The First day of the Bundy Ranch Political Prisoners tier 3 retrial of defendants Eric Parker, Steven Stewart, Scott Drexler, and Ricky Lovlein opened up this morning with Queen Navarro denying all defense motions, and granting all government motions yet again. She did all this from the protection of her chambers,and not in front of We The People because she doesn’t think the American Serfs have a right to argue her golden decrees from on high.  I have been a court observer since the beginning of the first trial, and so far it has worked out that the government has had the judge grant 100% of their substantive   motions, while the defense has never had one of their motions granted. I don’t know about you, but this judge seems pretty bias in favor of the prosecution to me. Today Navarro granted the governments motion saying that the defense attorney’s have no right to question potential jurors on their beliefs concerning the 1st, and 2nd amendment, and if that’s not bad enough for you, the motion also stated that the defense team could not even mention the words 1st or 2nd amendment to prospective Jurors. Does this sound like a fair trial to you or a kangaroo court from the old Soviet Union, or China? If you think the deck is stacked against our political prisoners you would be 100% right. Also please remember, this could be your son or daughter someday facing a bunch of trumped up charges, as our entire American belief system is being decided in this trial. So all of you out there that call yourself patriots, and cherish what little liberties we have left in our country better get off of their ass and come to Las Vegas Nevada and #Stand http://standlv.com with these God fearing men. 

http://thepetesantillishow.com

https://www.facebook.com/petesantillinotguilty/

http://thepetesantillishow.com/donate/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 18 comments
  • desertspeaks

    the bundy’s are doing it WRONG! They have to challenge applicability of the CONstitution and any and all subsequent legislation, statutes, so called laws, policies, etc as it applies to the bundy’s and their physically being in a given geographic area!

    NO SUCH EVIDENCE EXISTS THAT PROVES ANY OF THE GOVERNMENTS LAWS APPLY TO ANY PRIVATE PERSON, IT NEVER HAS EXISTED NOR WILL IT EVER EXIST! That is the ONLY question any defendant ever demand of a prosecutor! PROVE IT APPLIES TO ME SIMPLY BECAUSE I’M PHYSICALLY IN A GEOGRAPHIC AREA!!!! THEY PROSECUTION CANNOT PROVE ANY OF IT APPLIES! THERE ARE NO COMPETENT WITNESSES WITH FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE THAT IT DOES APPLY!!!! NO PHYSICAL, TANGIBLE EVIDENCE THAT ANY OF IT APPLIES!!!!!

  • godspell

    We need to help them , I am unable too but if anyone is able, please stand for us who cant. The courts no longer follow a constitution or any God given rights. They do as they please and punish anyone who gets in their way. Tell me something if we are so free why do we need permission to drive or travel from country to country or even fish . I hope the American people put a light on this because the MSM wont.

    • The Pete Santilli Show

      e are trying to shine light into the darkness, unfortunately, even when people see the light, they do nothing because they are simply Apathetic Buzzards!!!

      • mitch51

        Brother Pete,

        Hey!!! Remember the day that you told me that there were three suns up in the sky? I think you may have been right, it has hit 121* twice where I live so far. And to think that I didn’t believe you when you said that. Now I have a lot more confidence in your prognostic skills. :cool: :eek:

        • Andy

          because the temp has reached 121 there must be 3 suns? omfg

  • highwithaltitude

    When the judge asks if you understand the charges against you, you say “NO!”

    ANNOUNCEMENT 1
    “Your Honor, the 6th Amendment to the united States Constitution grants me the right
    to know the nature and cause at this action you are bringing against me, and it grants you, the
    court, the duty to tell me. I do not understand the nature and cause of this action which has
    been brought against me.”

    QUESTION 1
    “Is this going to be a CIVIL action or a CRIMINAL action?”

    “Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
    that this action against me, _______________ is a CRIMINAL ACTION. Now I have another
    question: …”

    QUESTION 2
    “Your Honor, the Constitution grants this court 2 different criminal jurisdictions: One is a
    criminal jurisdiction under a Common Law, and the other is a criminal action that
    constitutes a condition of contract under the criminal aspects of a colorable Admiralty
    jurisdiction. Under which of these 2 jurisdictions does court intend to try this criminal
    action?”

    ANNOUNCEMENT 2
    “Thank you your Honor, but I don’t think that you’d be violating your Oath of
    Office if you did your duty under the Constitution. You see I am not seeking legal advice;
    what I want to know is your legal intent; and I have the right to represent myself ‘in my own
    person’ without a licensed attorney. And in order to intelligently defend myself, I have to
    know the jurisdiction that this court is operating under; because the Rules of Criminal
    Procedure under a Common Law jurisdiction are very different from the Rules under an
    Admiralty jurisdiction. I need to know which jurisdiction you intend to try me under, in order
    for me to proceed with this case. Now the 6th Amendment grants me the right to know the
    jurisdiction being applied, and it grants you the duty to inform me; and I don’t think you’d
    be violating your Oath of Office for doing so. So please answer the question.”

    “Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
    that I _______________ the accused in this criminal action against me, have asked this court to
    divulge the nature and cause of the accusation, upon the authority of the 6th Amendment,
    and that this court HAS FAILED in its duty to inform me of the nature and cause of the
    action. Furthermore, LET THE RECORD ALSO SHOW that this court intends to bring
    this criminal action against me UNDER A SECRET JURISDICTION, THAT IS KNOWN
    ONLY TO LICENSED ATTORNEYS.”

    Judge says “This will be a statutory jurisdiction and I hope you’re satisfied!”

    “Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
    that it intends to conduct a criminal action against me, _______________ , under STATUTORY
    JURISDICTION. But the problem is that I have never heard of such a thing as a criminal
    action under statutory jurisdiction. I would be happy to accept this, Your Honor, if you
    could please tell me where I can find the published Rules of Criminal Procedure under
    Statutory Jurisdiction.”

    QUESTION 3
    “Do you have a copy of the Rules of Criminal Procedure under
    Statutory Jurisdiction in your office that I could borrow? Where does this
    nature, cause, and jurisdiction information exist? Do you know of a law library anywhere that
    has a copy of these rules? Since I am defending myself pro per, isn’t it your duty to specify
    which Rules of Criminal Procedure will be used, so that I may conduct a fair defense in a fair
    trial? You must tell me where I can access a copy of the Rules.”

    “Thank you Your Honor, LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW
    that this court intends to proceed with a criminal action against me, _______________ , as a
    condition of contract under the criminal aspects of a colorable Admiralty jurisdiction. ”

    QUESTION 4
    “Your Honor, you must realize that no courts in America have Admiralty
    jurisdiction without also having valid international contract in
    dispute. And I’m not aware of having entered any international contract. So I deny that any
    such contract exists. Now will you instruct the prosecuting attorney to inform this court that
    there is a valid international contract in dispute, if there is one; and to place this alleged
    international contract in evidence, if it exists; and explain how I can be a party to it, if I am;
    and how I am compelled to perform under it, if I am?”

    Prosecutor may get a smart (but foolish) full historical explanation of Admiralty
    jurisdiction from the prosecutor

    “Fine. LET THE RECORD OF THIS COURT THEN SHOW that this court has
    declared that a criminal action against me, _______________ , is a condition of international
    contract, under the criminal aspects of an Admiralty jurisdiction.”

    ANNOUNCEMENT 3
    Now Your Honor, according to the Law Merchant Codes, the very law that this contract
    was made under, there are certain things that constitute a valid vs an invalid contract. You
    must realize, that no court has the authority to enforce an invalid
    contract; and I deny the validity of the contract that Roosevelt entered into with the
    international bankers. He borrowed bank credit on the promise to redeem in gold coin.
    Creating credit out of thin air, the bankers had no risk and no interest, because they didn’t
    loan anything of value, and thus had no interest in the loan being paid: it was a ‘no interest
    ‘contract, and thus void by the international law of Nations. Therefore America owes no legal
    debt.”

    QUESTION 5
    “… And now since America only owes the debt by an invalid contract, how am I as an
    American Citizen, legally compelled to perform to an invalid contract under the
    Admiralty jurisdiction of this court?”

    • BillyP

      Thank you very much.

    • burned handle

      Armchair lawyers don’t help anyone.
      The “system” is broken, illegal…
      I’m surprised they just didn’t send them to Gitmo because they can.
      These folks may die before any “Justice” is served in this country. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

    • Government LIES

      You are so correct, i have been telling people this but they are too conditioned. And the reason your response is correct is because of the bankruptcy where the U.S. was made into a corporation in debt to those who “bailed” it out…the BANKSTER Khazarian Mafia.

      Bankruptcy of U.S. in 1933

      State of Emergency, War Powers Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917
      (Bankruptcy of The United States of America Declared)

      The United States went “bankrupt” in 1933. [President Roosevelt Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594, 1973]

      In 1950, declared “bankruptcy and reorganization”. Secretary of Treasury appointer receiver in the bankruptcy [Reorganization Plan, No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative History, Pg. 5967]

      The Secretary of the Treasury is the “Governor” of the International Monetary Fund, Inc. of the U.N. [Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942; U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-81; 26 U.S.C.A. 7701(a)(11); Treasury Delegation Order No 150-10]

      On Oct. 28th 1977, the United States as a “Corporator” and “State” declared insolvancy. State banks and most other banks were put under control of the “Governor” of the “Fund” (I.M.F.). 26 IRC 165 (g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188, 75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d. 911 Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447″Mr. Speaker, we are now in Chapter 11. Members of Congress are official Trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the United States government…” — (Mr. Trafficant from Ohio, Congressional Record, pg. H1303, March 17th, 1993)”…the United States obligations in the International Monetary Fund…” — Public Law 94-564, 94th Congress, Sec. 10(a)

      (State of National Emergency Declared)

      “Since March 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…” (Senate Resolution 9, 93d. Congress, 1st. Session, Foreward, 1973)

      “When Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution…” (Congressman Beck, Congressional Record, Farm Bill, 1933)

      “A majority of people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency…” — Senate Report 93-549 (Introduction) 1973

      “The President may: Seize property, organize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute Martial Law, seize and control and transportation and communication, regulate operation of private enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens”. — Senate Report 93-549; Senate Resolution 9, 93d Congress, 1st. Session (III) 1973 See: Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1, March 9, 1933; Proclamation 2038; Title 12 U.S.C 95(b) Currently, permanent state of national emergency. — 22 U.S.C.A. 286d. 1977; See: Executive Order 12919 signed by President Clinton

      Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 & 1933 (Notice: You Have Been Declared the Enemy!)

      Oct. 6, 1917, under the Trading with the Enemy Act, Section 2, subdivision (c), Chapter 106 – Enemy defined “other than citizens of the United States…” March 9, 1933, Chapter 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of Oct.6 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) amended as follows “…any person within the United States..” See H.R. 1491 Public No.1

      Who is Really Threatening the Security of Your Homeland?

  • mitch51

    Since the Bundy’s have been locked up their “free range” cows haven’t been in my back yard to eat my plants. So, that’s a good thing. It’s good to have a break from his cows. :eek: :cool:

    • BillyP

      Shut up kike.

  • EruditeOne

    Judge Navarro should be fired, removed from the court permanently and then federally prosecuted/punished in any way that the Department of Justice and Federal Attorney General can manage.

  • Ideas Time

    Dave H could do a whole series on this case and it is a mind blower.

    It deals with issues and exposes the corporate state masquerading as a gov and courts.

    It goes into detail why no executive administrator aka judges have lawfully ascended to the bench and how none of them have any jurisdiction. It is all fraud. None are compliant with Article 6 Clause 3 of the Constitution because their oath of office is non complainant and therefore none have ascended to the bench that sit on.

    Read the case and learn. This guy is ripping the state a new a hole and they can’t deal with him. He is to well informed and smart.

    The Bundy’s could take this fake judge down fast armed with this information. And their BAR attorney is not their friend. He is an officer of the court and the British Accredited Regency.

    This fraud would end quickly if writers would cover these issues but so far non will. Off limits is my guess.

    https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/

    • highwithaltitude

      AWESOME!!! Great Information…thanks a bunch! I will add it to what I already know…prepare, prepare, and prepare!

  • Ideas Time

    A little case law for those who can speak for themselves. You can see other good reasons the Bundy’s need to loose the courts servant they call their attorney. Their BAR attorney is not allowed to bring any of this stuff up as he really works for the state.

    For a crime to exist there must be and injured party (Corpus Delicti), there can be no sanction or penalty imposed on one because of this Constitutional right. Sherer v. Cullen 481 F. 945:
    CRUDEN v. NEALE 2N.C. (1796) 2 SE 70

    “Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent”

    Attorneys Non –Positive Law must have contract.
    “(a) The controlling rule is that “ absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person may be imprisoned for any offense … unless he was represented by counsel at his trial.

    “ Argersinger, 407 U. S. , at 37. Pp. 5-6.” Alabama v Shelton 535 U. S. 654 .”… when the trial of a misdemeanor starts that no imprisonment may be imposed , even though local law permits it, unless the accused is represented by counsel” Argersinger v Hamlin 407 U. S. 25-40

  • raburgeson

    Pay attention the rest of the world. This court room is not an exception. The USA is a repressive tyrannical regime. The US should be high on the list of undesirable governments and treated as such until there is freedom in the country. As you see the law does not matter and they will create the legal environment they want on the fly. This is the very same crooked court system I have been talking about in here for more than a year. The Constitution is superseded by no other law. They are concrete laws to be upheld by every court in the country. It defines the freedoms of the people of the Republic. After this type of abuse of the law, it should make everything transparent to every other country. Action should therefore be taken!

  • Ideas Time

    Maybe the Bundy’s should look into filing a Demand, Notice, and Warning of Commercial Grace and put the fear of God into these criminals.

    https://supremecourtcase.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/demand-notice-and-warning-of-commercial-grace.pdf

    • Christopher Kringle

      I’m curious how this has worked for you. Are you angling for a common law action? I need to do something similar. Thanks.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.