Profile image
By 50 Shades of Pissed Off
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Texas Church Shooter Killed Children Who Were Never Born

Saturday, November 25, 2017 13:12
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

This is what they were after (and always were after) with the false flag and hoax shootings.

Gun control bill introduced by eight senators in bipartisan effort 

But so and so has a friend who visits the Sutherland area and ohhhh it was real alright because his friend was an eye witness. Oh so your friend was an eye witness to the shooting or the fake memorials they put up? Did your friend witness any bodies or wounded being evacuated because if he did, he saw more than the press ever saw or anyone else who went there to record it. 

Sickening. 

You have to drop all pretense of logical thinking to believe an actual shooting took place….and to state that as fact? With no bodies, no wounded, no cars parked in the parking lot….only cops and rescue vehicles…. 

Also no one went in and cleaned up the blood and body tissue that would have been all over the inside of the church with all those ppl shot by an assault rifle.

They just come in and paint over it with WHITE PAINT……which is straight illegal by the way.

These are screenshots off the T.V. show “Inside Edition”.  Sorry for the poor quality. They were taken off a T.V. when “Inside Edition” showed the interior of the church. They painted the whole thing white and put white roses on chairs where people allegedly died.  Really bizarre if you ask me.

The church in Texas has been repainted and is set to be demolished…  26 ppl dead in a crime scene …painted in less than a week…will be hit with the wrecking ball in 2 weeks.   

But, there has not been a crime scene cleanup crew trained in bloodborn pathogens on the scene since the shooting.  This is a clear VIOLATION of LAW.   The place MUST be cleaned by a crew in protective gear, and the area must be cleaned with a terg-o-cide cleaner.  Any reason why they would not do this??

Technically the painters are walking and painting over blood? That is totally against the law.. You and I cannot walk on BLOOD soaked floors….painter or not…  Crime scene cleaners need to go in first. They never did.. 

Same thing with Sandy Hook….they never had crime scene cleaners. If someone like that doesn’t show up first, the place is legally supposed to be OFF LIMITS to all traffic. 

Federal Regulation 29CFR1910.1030 states that no employee can be placed in a position to be exposed to blood spills without having first:

  • “Received blood-borne pathogen (BBP) training.
  • Have a written BBP exposure control plan.
  • Have been provided personal protective equipment.
  • Have been offered Hepatitis B vaccine and exposure evaluation and follow-up.
  • Been provided with a method to remove and properly store the bio-hazardous waste in properly marked containers for disposal at an approved site.”

Every “t” should be crossed and every “i” should be dotted. I have dealt with bureaucracy for a long time in many areas, and bureaucrats will throw the book at you for one mistake. It gives purpose to their generally unimportant lives.

So when rules are not followed, and there are rules on the books….well…..there’s something extremely fishy going on.

And now the church in TX is being demolished? Why how convenient…This is how they get rid of evidence.  Or lack of evidence… like perhaps no damage or bullet holes to the front or inside of the church? (h/t RFB)

Texas church, site of deadly massacre, to be demolished 

Reminds me of Sandy Hook…

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also…this made me laugh… 

…random Arabs 😂😂. I seriously love the “weaponized autists” on /pol/ at 4chan. They are freaken hilarious.

It was under this thread (see next 2 screenshots).

Link to 4chan thread.

 

 

THE CHILDREN NEVER EVEN EXISTED 

DESCRIPTION ON VIDEO – “As with Sandy Hook, it appears from available records, that the children ‘killed’ in the Sutherland Springs Church “massacre”, were never actually born . It is known that the St. Rose of Lima church people helped out with attempting the Sandy Hook fraud. Is the Sutherland Springs church of the same ilk?

The John Holcombe and Crystal “pregnancy murder” story also appears to be bogus, as records show Crystal has NOT used the name “Holcombe” for some time now. Instead, records indicate that Crystal is with someone named Peter Hill now (hence the seeming confusion about real or fictitious children being named Holcombe or Hill).

Check this out:

We are so jaded now after all the completely fraudulent and absolute HOAXES they’ve pulled on us….some of the biggest events have had zero victims…events that were covered for weeks on end…. events that had very intense emotional effects on the public.

They traumatized the nation with these hoaxes.  Telling us twenty little 1st graders were shot to death in their classroom.  Turns out not a single one even existed. They’d used the younger pictures of children who were much older at the time of the event. 

Boston bombing….we even have it on video….not a single person was actually hurt or injured in this alleged bombing.  The one boy they claimed who did die was photoshopped into the scene. Never existed.  Never died.

The last church shooting in South Carolina last year or whenever it was….actors….at the pastors funeral they had an open casket and ACTUALLY used a wax figure of him at his funeral. All of the victims families were OPENLY PAID by our own govt. Since when does our govt pay families just because they were involved in a tragedy? No tears…forgiving the shooter the day after it happened. Nothing like real life. 

We are being asked to accept core narratives presented by mainstream media as truth until and only until you, the independent thinker, can mount up enough “proof” to debunk it. It’s a fallacy….an assumption that what the news says is true….UNTIL it can be debunked….when really it should be the other way around.

We are being bombarded with one psyop Gladio B staged event at a time. 

Operation Gladio, occurred throughout Europe mostly from 1960-1990.

But the current so called Operation Gladio B (which is also Northwoods II) is much more sophisticated. Gladio B, unlike Gladio A is being conducted in an era of mass psychological terror and deception made possible by technology, legalized propaganda, fake terror groups like ISIS and ANTIFA and a clear end-game scenario where the ruling elite know that faking an “attack” has the same effect as conducting an actual Gladio-style attack.

In other words, few are considering Gladio B which we should be in a highly technological AI era, and we must realize that it is a much more sophisticated operation this time around.

Our rogue government is now wildly slapping together one staged psyop event after another to keep the attention of the masses away from important things.

And then we are constantly bombarded with the govts AI troll program they’ve flooded social media with… And it’s ALWAYS the same thing. They ALWAYS use the “my best friend was there and her cousin died in the attack…so how dare you?” trying to shame ppl into shutting up. And I for one am just so sick of it. 

I know it’s hard to swallow…that they would prefer to use a “hoax model” over just really killing ppl. But they’ve been using the “hoax false flag” now since about 2008. And here is why they fake all of these events instead of just sending a patsy in and really killing victims….

This model that they like to use involves no real victims. And no it’s not because they value human life…They view us as cattle. Killing people is what they do before breakfast every day…

The reason they like to use the hoax model is simply because its not nearly as messy as the alternative (and no I’m not speaking in terms of blood and guts messy).

This right here is the main reason they use the hoax model….pay attention now…

BECAUSE WHEN PEOPLE DON’T TRULY OWN THEIR GRIEF THEY CAN BE CONTROLLED MUCH MORE EASILY.

The deep state learned their lesson after really killing ppl in the false flag of 9-11.

The victim’s families could not be controlled or managed to say the things they wanted them to say or push the agenda they wanted pushed.

The agenda 9-11 was meant to push was often overshadowed by the victim’s families demanding answers. Some of the very first “truthers” were the friends & family members of 9-11 victims.

Real people and real events “go off the tracks.” Real victims don’t follow scripts, can’t be controlled and get to be problems for the crime syndicate.

It gets WAY too messy and complicated when they really kill people and there is real grief and anger from loved ones….and they like these false flags to be real tidy. They are control freaks.

When your grief is not real and you are “in on it” you follow all orders…and you stick to the agenda and the talking points. You say whatever you’re told.

You don’t become a pesky nag in their side demanding answers…or become an amateur sleuth who angrily starts revealing the holes you find in the story…on a quest to find out what really happened to your loved one.

No one will be sued (just like at Sandy Hook where not one of the parents sued the school or sued anyone for preventing the first responders from entering the building, etc.). Having ZERO lawsuits filed after that kind of “tragedy” is unheard of.

Real victims would mean that real lawsuits would be filed by their loved ones which means that real evidence would be poured over and scrutinized  in court with a magnifying glass and of course we can’t have that.

Fake victims/no real deaths = crisis actors playing loved ones. Crisis actors instead of real heartbroken angry loved ones = no lawsuits and NO QUESTIONS.

And THIS is why they almost always use the hoax model for all their false flags. And they’ve conditioned the public to shame anyone who questions the official narrative. As though asking questions is disrespectful to the “deceased”.

FB_IMG_1496979796832

I say save your self righteous anger for someone else. Anytime there is a mass shooting being covered by our sold out govt controlled media for days on end you better believe I’m gonna take a good long look at it. They are proven liars who stage psyop after psyop on us. The default position must now be disbelief until proven otherwise.

FB_IMG_1496979940413.jpg

We know that the New World Order is almost here and that no huge news story is randomly being told by coincidence. There is an argument to be made that if the government and media did that now that might be considered wasted resources. All big news stories now have a specific purpose.

FB_IMG_1496979600606

Do NOT underestimate the PRICS (psychopaths really in charge). When you have unlimited money, resources, technology and power, and you are HELL BENT on conditioning the population you can and will do just about anything. They can and they do… Don’t be deceived.

Also, people always ask me…if it was a hoax false flag and no one died then where do the victims go? Well sometimes the victims are completely made up people that never existed…like at Sandy Hook….but often these ppl make deals beforehand and go to the underground cities or to another country where they change their identity, etc. 

I don’t usually pay attention to psychics because I know they’re getting their info from demons… but demons don’t always lie. Esp when telling the truth benefits their mission in the long run (dragging another soul to hell). 

The screenshot below is an article from the woman who runs psychic focus about what happened to Alison the reporter who was fake killed in the Virginia shooting on live TV.  (See last paragraph in screenshot below about where Alison allegedly ended up (the news reporter who was “shot on live tv”).

This would make alot of sense as her parents were happy and laughing with no tears in the millions of interviews they did RIGHT after she was supposedly gunned down live on TV. Man they sure got over it fast and started beating the gun control drum.  Only way that would make sense is if they knew she was safely tucked away and they were millions richer. Hard to hide your excitement then I’ll bet.

Also, you know one thing that I heard that made alot of sense to me…. the YouTuber “Crisis actor” lived near Newton at the time of Sandy Hook and actually was familiar w/ many of the ppl involved.  His videos were fascinating and he always had really interesting insight being so close to it all as he was. 

Anyways…one of the last videos he did on the subject….he was really shaken up….he had just spoken to someone and wouldn’t reveal any details…but he had found out that these crisis actor parents and crisis actor family members at Sandy hook had all been informed about the incoming planetary body….the one theyve known.about since the 80s which is almost upon us now….anyways they had been told about it and promised a spot for they and their families in the underground cities….the ones they’ve built funneling billions of our tax dollars to all these years. 

So finding out about this cataclysm thats coming….and being promised a spot on the ark if you will…along with money….the govt launders the payment through the go fund me and any donations gained from the public are icing on the cake. 

If you had the choice what would you do? I know I could never do what they did no matter what…but if you’re a liberal who already thinks guns should go then it’s prob not that huge of a moral decision…esp if it means your family will be safe.  

Also they’re told it’s for the greater good that guns be confiscated before the cataclysm as “they’ll only cause more death and violence when society breaks down.” (Of course we know the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. And bad guys will always have guns.) 

But anywyas he made that video a few years ago and it was the first he had heard about Nibiru so he was really shook up over it as you can imagine. 

But it makes sense that perhaps this promise of safety… is the carrot they are dangling in front of these crisis actors….one that is huge enough and important enough for these ppl to continue the charade no matter what.

Either way..they have billions of our tax dollars to spend on these hoaxes. Stand by for many more  America is being attacked from the INSIDE.

 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 14 comments
  • Anonymous

    Spot on. I think I love you, lol.

  • Don - 1

    I was hoping that Trump would put a STOP to all the false flags and fake shootings.

    Is he ALSO a part of these frauds and hoaxes?

    I know for a fact that Obama was deeply involved in fake FEMA/DHS operations.

    I guess I’m just too optimistic…..its depressing.

    • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

      You’re talking about a guy that has WWWAAAAAYYYYY more tentacles to deal with than Nemo.
      1 person and help, cannot possibly clean up SOOOO many years of treason in A YEAR.
      Patience Don, hard as it IS, patience.
      JFK made a lot of enemies all at once. It cost him.
      Maybe, MAYBE, the Don learned something. :idea:

      • Anonymous

        Yeah but if you make a lot of promises to get elected and then don’t even go near any of them, you are making far more enemies than you started with so it blows your theory.

        • Andy

          and yet everyone who bought his promises can see EXACTLY why they are not being implemented – not for a lack of trying, but from deliberate blocking even by his own party

          • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

            :idea:

        • Hi NSA, kiss my artichoke

          A politician can make enemies out of all the sheep he or her wants.
          The enemies that can have one capped with a phone call are the ones to worry about. :wink:
          Just ask any of Bill and Hillary’s friends.
          Oh, wait. You can’t. :shock:

    • 50 Shades of Pissed Off

      Don, I know it’s sad….but you have to realize that they killed Trump. Trump WAS the real deal..You DO have good judgment. He WAS legit and fully intended to drain the swamp. But he was only one man against all.the forces of hell. There’s no way they were going to allow him to mess up their plans at this end stage in their hundred year plan. I’m almost positive they killed him right before we bombed Syria (which is WHY we bombed Syria…it wasn’t Trumps decision). They killed him and Cloned him and now use an organic robotoid in his place. If you don’t know what that is read this. http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/11/clones-and-organic-robotoids-run-dc-and-hollywood-3575068.html :mrgreen:

  • allendaves

    beware of false flags ..moon landings and governments that commit treason for the good of the people……..123’s of true Christianity v popular & damnable heresies

    #1 “ANOTHER JESUS”:
    -“ONE” not triune: Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is….. IF YOU CAN’T GET THIS “FIRST OF ALL COMMANDMENTS” RIGHT, ALL THE REST OF YOUR “FAITH” AND PREACHING ON LOVE & SIN IS MOOT….. (NOTE: And yes, the specific Greek and Hebrew words used also and only define one person contrary to the ridiculous obfuscation attempts of some!?!)
    PART 4 & 5 HOW MANY GODS ARE THERE FOR THE ONE GOD TO TALK TO?? Who was Jesus praying to??!?…. The real question should be … How does having multiple different persons keep this one God/being/entity from praying to himself?! (The trinitarian “schizophrenic” “god-head”) The Trinitarians want to have their cake and eat it too as the saying goes. On the one hand they need to say they only worship one indivisible God being/ entity but on the other hand they feel the need for some reason to keep Jesus or God from praying and talking to himself by dividing him up into different persons!?! It never occurs to them that that since there is only one indivisible God to pray too and Jesus is that indivisible God come in the flesh that he would need to talk to himself as to show us how to live, suffer, pray and die for our/ flesh) benefit not his!?!….. So while Trinitarians are quick to complain that God was not talking to himself at Christ baptism or in Gen “let us” they ignore the logical demands of their own theology! If Jesus is the ONE GOD in flesh and the Father is the SAME ONE GOD in heaven then Trinitarianism demands THE ONE GOD is talking to HIMSELF! Claiming that God is multiple different persons as the reason for why God is not talking to himself (because God is three different “selfs”) only demonstrates that what they really worship is in fact not a ONE GOD who talks to himself but three different god “selfs”/ and they all talk to each other! When they speak about who God was talking and praying to, they are quick to say “the other person, NOT HIMSELF!” But if you ask them how many gods do they pray to then they will say “ONLY ONE”!?! They expect you to believe that those three different persons are THE ONE GOD-BEING” which is like calling three different cars “THE ONE VEHICLE” (text book examples of prov 26:12)

    -PART 5 Echad, Echad, my God, God is Echad!….:The Greek word pros in Jn 1:1 does not demand nor demonstrate multiple different persons because:

    1. The definitions (without forced conclusions stuffed in) are just as equally valid as reference to parts of the same person (modalisim) Your head and your right arm have close relationship to each other; can be facing, towards, relating to, moving to, in the direction of, to, unto, looking to; even at home with, a living union, in the presence of, a common ground, closeness They are still both distinct and different from each other and yet they are of both the same person. Ironically the scriptures use the very same terms to describe father and son.

    2. Ironically and most hypocritically, the trinitarians are trying to appeal to the anthropomorphisms (they claim this passage implies) to demonstrate different persons while at the same time denying the very anthropomorphisms that God himself specifically in scriptures uses to define the son and the son’s relationship to the father. Apparently only the literal anthropomorphisms that trintiarins “see’ exist while the one’s that God himself uses should not be taken too literal or too anthropomorphic or seriously. Is the face anthropomorphic and or literal face or just some metaphor? Either way the problem for trinitarians still exist and simply does not cease with linguistic distractions. There are many different types of faces; face of a clock; face of a mirror; face of one’s palm. Further, the face of one’s palm would be totally consistent with the anthropomorphism that God uses when discussing his own right arm as the son! So either way, a literal and or anthropomorphic face or a metaphorical face in close relationship only leaves the trinitarinas peddling an empty argument hoping no one notices the fact that this argument is nothing more then delusional smoke and mirrors for “the faithful” and for everyone else, well, just “never mind that man behind the curtain”.

    3. You cant appeal to your own desired and or preconceived conclusions as evidence that your methodology in arriving at your conclusions are valid. [ie the use of Jn 1:18 et al as proof that Jn1:1 supports different persons in Jn1:18 et al or visa versa ] How difficult can they make these simple things? The God in heaven is a he but cannot be known except by the he who is the same God in flesh! So why can’t they be the same he again? It should not be difficult to understand since:

    A. The same God who is in heaven is on earth and the difference need only be of circumstance which at least we know that much to be factually true [spirit only v spirit in human flesh] There is no further need or demand for different individual persons since all the different he’s are in fact the same HE!. Trying to claim that God is multiple different “He(s)” who make up the one being either leaves your God to be a “it” that consist of different he(s) or a“God being” who is a he while simultaneously consisting of different individual he(s) [Father-he; Son=he; Holy Spirit=he].

    B. If you find no difficulty in accepting that God is a he that consist of father son and holy spirit also referred to each as a different he and yet all the same he then what is the point to claiming different persons again? How is the multitude of hes who are all the same he show or demand different persons rather than different circumstances of the same person who is in fact “HE”?

    In any case, the trinitarian inconsistency and or incoherence will never be resolved by simply chalking it all up to “how great thou art” unless you willingly and blindly “drink the cool aid” calling it “faith”. True faith is in the words of God (including the specific anthropomorphism God himself uses) not in wild created imaginations of three different persons with different minds, locations and instructions for each other that is somehow not a pantheon of three gods who are only “one in terms of purpose not one god!….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh! Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4

    -JOHN 14: 8-20 ….[Note Isaiah 9:6. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: …: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, … the everlasting Father] ….The son, father/Holy Spirit are all the same person, NOT like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?!
    Jn 14 continued….…………..17. Even THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH; (Jn 14:6 I AM the way, THE TRUTH,) whom the world cannot receive, .. for HE DEWLLETH WITH YOU, (present tense/standing next to them in the flesh) and SHALL BE IN YOU… (future tense “In them”) 18. I will not leave you comfortless: I WILL COME TO YOU (future tense “In them”) Jesus himself here makes the point that the same person who was the HOLY SPIRIT that would come was standing next to them but lets them know “I will come to you again to be Inside of you”

    -The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural) Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense

    -Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5; TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…

    -This should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……Today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into the image of your vain imaginations!
    You can download the complete FREE book from
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/305367608/The-Trinity-Heresy
    OR
    https://www.academia.edu/23463667/THE_TRINITY_HERESY
    OR
    http://www.globethics.net/gtl/10920799

    #2 “ANOTHER GOSPEL”:
    -If you ask most people what the Good news or Gospel is they will probably tell you about the virgin birth or Christ death burial and resurrection. This would be rather humorous if it was not so sad considering that for the three and half years of Christ ministry he does not mention hardly ever. However, Christ does spend a lot of time preaching out of the OT scriptures. Now imagine given a report or manual to read and understand, that makes reference to and even quotes other source material and then ignoring that source material when it comes to defining the context and meanings of words in the report or manual you are trying to make sense of. If that seems dysfunctional that is because it is. This is, however, what most people are doing when it comes to understanding sound NT doctrine and or even what the Gospel message of Jesus was. The mystery of the gospel was not the death, burial and resurrection although it is part of it. In fact, death, burial and resurrection was the sign, the only sign, that Jesus gave to validate that the gospel message he was preaching all that time was true……and yet most deny it!?!?!

    -The “2nd coming”… “I come quickly” so “Hold fast till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 years I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 (in their lifetime) are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the Lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES. The “idea”/ doctrine that Jesus has not yet returned but “soon any day now soon” does not just make God out a liar; it is not just ridiculous but makes Christianity a mockery, A pathetic “ship of fools”!?!
    -The following example excerpt from Bertrand Russell: sometimes quoted by atheist et al and from his published work “Why I Am Not A Christian”
    Defects in Christ’s Teaching
    Having granted the excellence of these maxims, I come to certain points in which I do not believe that one can grant either the superlative wisdom or the superlative goodness of Christ as depicted in the Gospels; …. I am concerned with Christ as He appears in the Gospels, taking the Gospel narrative as it stands, and there one does find some things that do not seem to be very wise. For one thing, he certainly thought that His second coming would occur in clouds of glory before the death of all the people who were living at that time. There are a great many texts that prove that. He says, for instance, “Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel till the Son of Man be come.” Then he says, “There are some standing here which shall not taste death till the Son of Man comes into His kingdom”; and there are a lot of places where it is quite clear that He believed that His second coming would happen during the lifetime of many then living. That was the belief of His earlier followers, and it was the basis of a good deal of His moral teaching. When He said, “Take no thought for the morrow,” and things of that sort, it was very largely because He thought that the second coming was going to be very soon, and that all ordinary mundane affairs did not count. I have, as a matter of fact, known some Christians who did believe that the second coming was imminent. I knew a parson who frightened his congregation terribly by telling them that the second coming was very imminent indeed, but they were much consoled when they found that he was planting trees in his garden. The early Christians did really believe it, and they did abstain from such things as planting trees in their gardens, because they did accept from Christ the belief that the second coming was imminent. In that respect, clearly He was not so wise as some other people have been, and He was certainly not superlatively wise.
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/305366745/Revelation-the-First-Gospel-of-the-Kingdom
    OR
    http://www.globethics.net/gtl/5455069
    OR
    https://www.academia.edu/23464127/REVELATION_THE_FIRST_GOSPEL_OF_THE_KINGDOM
    Amazon/Barns & Nobel et al
    978-1-4907-0590-3 (SC ISBN)

    #3 GOD LOVES EVERYONE; Jesus Died for “you”…… Just “come as you are”
    Does God love you?….”Probably” NOT!….and NO Jesus did not die for everyone!?!……There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups : A. The predestined damned B. the “many” called C. The “Few” Chosen
    Predestination….its true..its all true… God does NOT love everyone:

    Prov 8: 17. I LOVE THEM THAT LOVE ME …………
    1John 5:3. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments:

    (1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD

    (2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,

    (3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
    will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”

    PS: “The world” that God so loved was not the Roman world nor the world of the Maya nor the world you imagined in your head that God specifically told them NOT TO LOVE!?!
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/306868420/Most-True-Christians-Go-to-Hell
    OR
    http://www.globethics.net/gtl/10920800
    OR
    https://www.academia.edu/25217564/Most_True_Christains_Go_to_Hell

    THE THIEF-BAPTISM-GRACE& THE NAME-LORD & LT

    “whosoever shall call on THE NAME OF THE LORD shall be saved”
    ………So WHAT “NAME” did you “CALL UPON”?……
    Rev 19:13. .. and HIS NAME IS called THE WORD OF GOD
    Ps 138:2. praise THY NAME … for thou hast magnified THY WORD ABOVE ALL THY NAME -
    NOTE: God placed His “THE WORD” ABOVE all of God’s various NAMEs – and Jesus NAME IS called “THE WORD” no other name saves. The MOST important name we should KNOW and CALL UPON is “THE WORD”; Not letters that spell “word” but the sayings/ doctrine/commands. It does NOT say “thy word is given a name above other names because here THY WORD is identified as the name that is placed above all other names.
    Isaiah 52:1. . 6. Therefore MY PEOPLE SHALL KNOW MY NAME: ..What NAME do you “KNOW”.?
    1Jn 2:3. And HEREBY WE DO KNOW that we KNOW HIM, if we KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS./ Titus 1: 16. They profess that THEY KNOW God; but IN WORKS THEY DENY him…
    “AT the name OF JESUS”…..Jesus has a name that belongs to Jesus…just like the name OF GOD means a name that belongs to GOD but it is ridiculous to suggest that the letters G-O-D is that name…likewise the name OF JESUS is NOT the letters J-E-S-U-S. Why would anyone think that you could pronounce THE HIGHEST NAME OF GOD letter by letter…. (ie Judges 13:18; 2Cor 12:4 but God’s name is not as great and or “unspeakable )
    Rev 3:8 kept MY WORD, and hast not DENIED MY NAME; …
    .Jn 17:6. I have MANIFESTED THY NAME And they have KEPT THY WORD.;
    THE WORD is THE NAME above every name that saves us 1Pt 3:21 The ONE baptism(Eph 4:5) is into THE WORD ( which is also baptism in the Holy spirit Jn 6:63the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit ) ..ALL the sayings doctrines and commands….what did THE WORD that became flesh command? (Mat 28:19)…..what did THE WORD exemplify? (Mat 3:15/ Jn 4:1)………among other things…..YES .water baptism is just as essential and necessary for much a part of salvation (1Pt 3:21) as is keeping one self away from works of the flesh (Gal 5:21)….In fact obedience to the command of water baptism is specifically identified as the act of calling on the name of the Lord (Col 2:12 “……though the operation[work] of God” CAN ANY MAN BE SAVED WITHOUT GOD WORKING ON HIM?) …..THE WORD OF GOD is the name of God that men call upon OR…OR ..they DENY with their disobedience
    The scriptures tell us almost nothing about the thief’s life. However, the scriptures tell us a great deal about Christ life……Jesus had been around for 3.5 years before the cross and was Baptizing (Jn 4:1-2 in fact He instructed his disciples to do so and did many more then John the Baptist ever did) …..Those who try to appeal to the thief on the cross assume the thief had never heard of Jesus preaching and had never ever been baptized….The burden of Proof is on those who say baptism is not essential! ………..You can’t claim a logically valid “non-essentiality” doctrinal argument on ANYTHING based on what the scriptures do not say and in spite of the things it clearly does state to the opposite effect!…That is like looking at the constitutional law and then basing a argument against a constitutional principle in law based on the fact that history did not record for us what some unknown cattle thief did or did not do a 150 years ago?!?! What??..Who cares?? We know what the constitution did say 150 years ago. I don’t know of any Law school that bases its teaching on constitutional law based on what history does not tell us about unknown cattle thieves!?! ..Jesus command, preached & practiced Baptism so did the apostles ….To build one’s theology on the fact that the scriptures do not tell us ANY detail(s) of the thief’s life before the cross (we know almost absolutely nothing about the thief!!) it is quite foolish and willfully ignorant of what the scriptures do say about baptism…….so those who try to use the thief are in effect building their house on the sand of what scriptures do not say about a thief in spite of what the scriptures do specifically tell us about baptism!?!… “Their damnation is just” comes to mind…
    https://www.scribd.com/document/326686356/Thief-Cross-3D OR https://www.academia.edu/23846490/Thief_and_Cross_3D

    • PixiePaul

      :!: :!: :!: Before It’s News; PLEASE rid us of this FREAK :!: :!: :!:

      :!: :!: :!: allendaves a.k.a goastdale is an EVIL SPAMMER :!: :!: :!:

      • Gus Fung

        PixieAndy,

        Got to be honest…

        I think the posts known as allendaves / goatsdale are a “put on” by a sore loser who can’t show his face here anymore.

        • Andy

          i Fung

          just curious, who is the sore loser?

  • Bob DD

    PLANET X (Nibiru) was said to be a hoax??? Article ran on BIN about 2 weeks ago quoted a supposed former NASA scientist (think his name was William Morrison) and said there has never been, isn’t one, and will never be a Planet X. No evidence! Was this Morrison guy fake by a gov’t plant? With all the crazy things going on with the weather and apparent pole shift? What’s the truth?

  • Mick

    These false flags have woken up many people who otherwise would have gone through life thinking everyone who questions the official story is a conspiracy theorist.

    Je ne suis pas un Charlie.

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.