Profile image
By Vaccine Liberation Army
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Medical Tyranny: All Medical Marijuana users are disqualified to possess guns

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 22:47
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Armed with Knowledge

Cannabis and Gun Control Policy

Christopher Morales, a California criminal defense attorney, provided some legal insight into this complex matter. “The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits anyone from possessing guns if they use or are addicted to cannabis,” Morales explained.

“The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits anyone from possessing guns if they use or are addicted to cannabis.”

The exact wording of the federal law prohibits any “unlawful user” or addict of cannabis (or any other federally restricted substance) from purchasing guns, even if that individual resides in a state with legal medical or adult-use cannabis laws.

A Nevada medical marijuana patient named S. Rowan Wilson challenged the ruling after she attempted to purchase a firearm for self-defense in 2011. When the gun store refused to sell to her, she filed a lawsuit challenging the federal statute against gun ownership by a lawful marijuana patient.

The case went all the way to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, where, on August 31, 2016, Chief District Judge Gloria Navarro ruled that a federal government ban of gun sales to abiding state-legal medical marijuana patients does not violate the Second Amendment. READ MORE…

Recently, the Honolulu Police Department in Hawaii has sent a series of letters to residents who use medical marijuana, informing them that they are disqualified from owning firearms, even if they were obtained legally and in compliance with state and federal law. If the medical marijuana users refuse to turn over their firearms, then presumably, they will face state-sanctioned violence until the guns are removed.

“This letter is to inform you that under the provisions of the Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), Section 134-7(a) you are disqualified from firearms ownership, possession, or controlling firearms. Your medical marijuana use disqualifies you from ownership of firearms and ammunition,” the letter reads. It goes on to say that residents who use medical marijuana “have 30 days upon receipt of this letter to voluntarily surrender your firearms, permit and ammunition to the Honolulu Police Department (HPD) or otherwise transfer ownership.”

READ MORE…

The post Medical Tyranny: All Medical Marijuana users are disqualified to possess guns appeared first on Vaccine Liberation Army.



Source: http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2017/12/06/medical-tyranny-medical-marijuana-users-disqualified-possess-guns/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • desertspeaks

    codes, laws, statutes, policies, blah blah blah.. when you ask any government official if the laws apply to you simply because you’re physically in a given geographic area, they will all nod their heads yes, in unison. they will insist it all applies..
    HOWEVER, when you ask them to prove it applies to you, they simply do not understand that you would question THEIR RELIGION!
    And yes, statism is a religion..

    This question baffles them, as they all sincerely believe it applies to everyone “with the exception of themselves when it’s convenient” and what they can’t do, is actually prove any of it applies to you! There is no evidence that it applies to you, no such evidence has ever nor will ever exist. Insisting something is factual isn’t actual evidence proving a damn thing.. neither are beliefs, feelings or opinions. Nor is religious fervor for their god, the state!

    Recently, there has been an uprising of questioning the applicability of their laws to individual private people, and the oddest thing is happening when they are challenged to prove their laws apply. In a lot of instances, they withdraw from the charge that it applies, because they know they can’t prove any of it applies. FYI, this is occurring in court trials, judges are dismissing charges “rare but it’s happening” district attorney’s are withdrawing charges that would put most people in jail,.. all because private men and women are demanding they actually adhere to their gods own laws/rules/codes, and PROVE IT APPLIES!
    On the flip side of this coin, district attorney’s lie and commit fraud, in collusion with the judge, making the CLAIM it applies WITHOUT PROVIDING A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT ANY OF IT EVER APPLIED TO ANYONE! THAT IS CALLED FRAUD AND COWARDICE! They know they can’t produce what has never existed, they know that their jobs hang in the balance, without the SUBTERFUGE AND OUTRIGHT FRAUD, their entire claim falls apart.

    Would you voluntarily subject yourself to the rule of these liars, frauds, thieves and murderers?? OF COURSE NOT, and they know it!

    DEMAND THEY PROVE ON THE RECORD “under RULE 11(B)3 THAT THE PROSECUTION PROVIDE EVIDENCE AS THEIR OWN RULES UNEQUIVOCALLY STATE!

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_11
    Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    (b) Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper—whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it—an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:

    (3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

    (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.

    PLEASE REMEMBER BELIEF, OPINION, FEELINGS OR REPEATING THAT SOMETHING APPLIES TO YOU, IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN EVIDENCE.. One other point, there must be a WITNESS WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE THAT CAN ATTEST THAT IT APPLIES TO YOU OR IT FAILS TO PROVE ANYTHING!

  • Arte Vespule

    Don’t care. I already have the guns. I ain’t turning them in. If you want them come and get them. But be sure to bring own cause I will be shooting you when you get here….

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.