The Implications of a 60 Degree Crust Shift Makes Everything We Have Been Told About History Untrue

The Implications of a 60 Degree Crust Shift Makes Everything We Have Been Told About History Untrue

In a previous article, I discussed how the Hawaiian-Emperor Chain provides proof of an earth crust shift that coincides with the K/T impact event 65 million years ago. The Hawaiian Island chain originates over a hot spot and the tectonic plates move the chain to the Northwest where it makes a 60 degree bend and becomes the Emperor sea mount chain. In this article I will look at some of the implications of the 60 degree (30 degrees at the poles) crust shift which are very significant. The crust shift makes everything we have been told about history untrue.

This first implication is the ice age theory is wrong. A 60 degree crust shift near the equator equates to a 30 degree shift at the poles due to the shape of the earth. Charles Hapgood proposed an earth-crust displacement theory as a possibility and stated that there were not any ice ages but only the current ice caps had been in different locations due to crust shift. (Ref: Hapgood,Charles H. The Path of the Pole, Philadelphia: Chilton Books, 1970) The Hawaiian Island chain proves the earth-crust displacement theory and I have to agree with Hapgood in that there were no ice ages but by using the Hawaiian-Emperor bend as a pivot, and the longitude of the ChicxulubCrater as a guide, the prior North Pole would have been in what is now the Hudson Bay in Canada. This would have put the former ice cap much farther south and would explain the evidence put forth for the ice age. The crust shift evidence proves that there was not a change in climate causing an ice age but that the pole ice cap was actually in a different location.

The next implication has to do with Antarctica. Canadian author Rand Flem-Ath proposed that Antarctica is Plato’s Atlantis. I have not read the book but I have to agree that the crust shift proves that Antarctica would have been 30 degrees to the North in a more temperate climate and ice free as the evidence suggest. Plato said that Atlantis was a continent and Antarctica fits the description by Plato.

The next implication is that the flood legends recorded around the world are true. A 60 degree crust shift caused by the K/T event impact would force the oceans to flood the lands. The implication is that there were civilizations worldwide 65 million years ago that recorded the flood in their legends. I propose that the crust shift and the flood legends show that the two are not separate or coincidence. If you think it is not possible and that people were not alive 65 million years ago read the book Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson.(http://www.forbiddenarcheology.com/)  In it they provide overwhelming evidence that humans have been on this planet for many millions of years.

Another timely implication is the Mayan civilization was near ground zero for the K/T impact at Chicxulub Crater and was destroyed. If the Mayan civilization was destroyed 65 million years ago who made up the supposed date of December 21, 2012 as the end of the Mayan calendar and why how did they arrive at that date?

Lots to think about and I will write more implications soon. You can see my previous article on the crust displacement here:

/story/2007/754/The_Hawaiian_Island_Chain_Provides_Proof_of_a_60_Degree_Earth_Crust_Shift_65_Million_Years_Ago.html

Also this short (amateur) video explanation I made here: http://youtu.be/XEhA-QoLmV8