The Big Lie | NASA Admits We've Never Been Out Of Low Earth Orbit
In a rapidly changing world where information is constantly changing, it can be difficult to discern the truth from lies sometimes .In what some are seeing as a soft disclosure of the moon landings having been faked, NASA is now openly admitting they can’t leave low earth orbit. They also admit struggling to figure out how to get astronauts through the Van Allen belts.
President Obama addressed some of these challenges in several of his speeches, and also spoke of not being able to leave low earth orbit.
In the video above we look at all this and more. We take
a look at how we have been indoctrinated to believe some of these
lies from a very young age. How the moon landing hoax, and fake
space program lie can be perpetrated on the public at large.
It requires the use of The Big Lie. A lie so big it is
interwoven into the fabric of our lives.
Via:Http://enigmadigest.blogspot.com
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,605,711,833 |
| Stories: | 8,138,082 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
It’s not just the moon. How are so many real estate vacation lake rentals advertising anywhere from 3-20 mile views across the lake if we are living on a ball of 24,901 miles? Twenty miles should include 268 feet of curvature using Pythagorean trig. No way should you be able to take a telescope and see across the lake with a curvature in the way. Water exposes the biggest fraud of all time.
Then how come I can’t look east from Florida and see Africa in the distance with my telescope? The same telescope that can see amazing clear images of the full Moon at night?
Care the e’splain that one Pointdexter? [Not to be confused with the Pointdexter stalker that is Butt Hurt Bob]!
One possible reason, CS, is when you’re looking toward Africa you’re having to punch through 4,000 miles of the earth’s atmosphere, at sea level densities, but when you’re looking straight up the atmosphere is only around 300 miles thick and the vision reducing part is as little as 10 miles thick.
Pollution, terrain vegetation. Just go to any large lake or ocean. Pick a distant place on the coastline that you know the mileage and look down the coast or across the lake. Take optics. Even a 30 Zoom will take a nice picture of something 10 miles away on a clear calm day. A windy day puts a lot of debris in the air so your photo won’t be as clear.
Water exposes this scam.
Baloney. Radio/Radar operators all over earth would have been able to track the spacecraft. Annnnd… do you also
contend (pretend) that Mars/Jupiter/Pluto/Ceres etc. missions are all fake. Gimme a break.
You’re disproving your own case, JohnDave. By pointing out that unmanned craft are tracked. Be logical for a moment and realize: tracking doesn’t establish human presence on a craft.
It is not a problem, to relay voice communications, or any kind of data, through an unmanned craft.
The Soviet Union knew what we were doing. There was a quid pro quo. (see: the Great Grain Robbery) (also see: the fraudulent Gagarin flight that we pretended to believe.)
Notice the Soviets returned an Apollo capsule in 1970. They found it. In the ocean.
Notice that no one on Earth has even pretended to go beyond low Earth orbit, except Americans for for 6 years, ending in 1972. That was a long time ago, JohnDave.
I don’t doubt that we have soft-landed vehicles on Mars and have pictures. But NASA isn’t showing them to us. They are showing us pictures that have animal bones and arctic lemmings in them.
I don’t doubt that we sent unmanned craft to Saturn. But in the pictures we get to see, notice that Iapetus looks just like the Death Star in Star Wars. Notice the “equatorial ridge” assembly point. They are playing with you, JohnDave.
Moon rocks fall to Earth as meteorites all the time, and we’ve known that since 1963. Why did nobody talk about that, in the Apollo era?
How come we didn’t know until the Van Allen probes in 2013 that the electron belt changes all the time, and can increase in intensity (by a factor of 1,000) in a few hours?
How come we didn’t know until 2009 (per the LRO) how radioactive the Moon is. We had LROs in the 1960s, and unmanned vehicles on the surface besides. How come there is at least 1/3 more radiation that we thought, as reported in 2009.
While you’re researching all this, as I hope you will, look for the communications satellite we sent into lunar orbit in the 1960s. As a “test.” I’m having trouble finding it by google.
Seriously Capt. PE
Paragraph structure! Have a central thesis, develop it with supporting material, wrap it up succinctly.
These inane ‘Lists’ just come off as the ramblings of an incontinent fool. [Notice I didn't say 'incompetent', for good reason, right Capt???]
Central Cluelessness: Refute any fact stated.
Oh, you can’t.
About that thesis. You have it backwards. When you start with a thesis and then get around to supporting material, you are engaging in fallacious (deductive) reasoning.
Try this: start with some facts. Then draw a conclusion from them.