"Immigration, immigration, immigration!" - EU - Virtuous Conception: - But!

In many respects the experimental idea of a European Union transforming member state countries and regions across Europe into something more like that of the United States of America, that ultimately is part of the United Nations, (thus NATO & Agenda 21) established in 1945 to promote international co-operation and a replacement for the ineffective League of Nations;

    thus eventually gathering all the nations from around the world and placing them under the umbrella of a single global supranational new world order government – sounds like a noble gesture and worthy cause.

       If it could eradicate poverty, bring terrorism to an end and cease the need for nations to go to war, then this sounds like a wondrous utopian plan and world to live in.

If homelessness is addressed, the true nature and the issues of drugs and crime tackled, it opens up trade links and upholds the ‘rights of man’ in general, such as the right that every single person is protected from being exploited, abused, hurt or used in any disadvantageous way whatsoever by either corrupt governments or shady employers and that which then helps to enhance the lives of all those involved, then again of course it’s certainly the right and benevolent way to go.

     However, and here’s the main problem; like most worthy ideas with the most gracious of intentions, there sadly always seems to be small or large groups or individual’s hell bent on exploiting, corrupting and dominating the rest, which ultimately ends up destroying what originally was perhaps a virtuous conception and great idea.

     A supranational worldwide government is far from being a new concept, time and time again history has shown such attempts.

     Though no complete world government has ever existed throughout human history, there have been several empires or dictatorships that encompassed substantial portions of the then known world.

     Famous examples are the Persian Empire, which Alexander the Great seized and claimed as his own empire, as well as the Roman Empire, the Mongol Empire and of course the British Empire.

     In the case of the British, a quarter of the world’s land surface and approximately a third of the world‘s population was part of that Empire. This is the single closest time that the world has ever come to a total political unification.

     It’s almost as if the German’s still dwell and strive for such as empire and it could be argued with the European Union they are – or should we say, were almost successful in achieving it?

     As noted previously, on the 17 March 2015, the world’s population stood at 7,301,925,777.

     According to a study by anti-poverty charity Oxfam, the wealthiest 1% will soon own more than the rest of the world’s population combined.

     The charity’s research shows that the share of the world’s wealth owned by the richest 1% increased from 44% in 2009 to 48% in 2014.

     On current trends, Oxfam says it expects the wealthiest 1% to own more than 50% of the world’s wealth by 2016.

     The research coincided with the start of the 2015 World Economic Forum in Davos.  The annual gathering attracts top political and business leaders from around the world whom all fall into this 1%.

     Yet this leaves bit of a dilemma for the billions of us who remain outside the arena the 1% reside in, for those inside this elite Amphitheatre of life really do not view “everyone” as a collective, despite on the exterior they may give the impression that they do and that their long term plans and great visionary ideas are for the greater benefit of mankind; – the simple truth of the matter is, it is often not the case and the only ones who truly benefit, is themselves – and no one else.

     The same old people who stem from the already existing 1% and whose own countries have never yet been able to sort-out its own internal strife and political affair – and as we’ve just touch on; such as dealing with the distinctive inner-city problems of not having enough social housing, (1.8 million people are on the social housing lists in the UK alone).

     The problems of drugs, poverty, crime and such high unemployment rates, despite the British government massaging the figures and proclaiming there is less unemployment than before, for as said elsewhere, the majority of people declared “unemployed” before the coalition government was forced upon the nation in 2010, have been taken off “unemployment benefits” and placed onto some other type of non-productive and equally as expensive schemes or universal credits.

     The truth is they are being forced to become “self-employed” and work for Universal Credits and zero contract hours and purely because there are more people than there are actual vacancies available.

     So knowing of and seeing all this going on around them; then why the hell are “they” trying to amalgamate and forcibly fuse together the world’s problems and tackle them as one?

     Of course people from other cultures can and do live in harmony, after all we all human beings who share the same type of inspirations, dreams and desires;

     yet you cannot expect to force something upon others and especially if it’s ill-conceived and thought out like that of the EU and benefiting just a minority.

     Instead, why don’t they at least try and address and sort out their own backyard and wayward children before knocking on their neighbour’s door and telling them how they should or shouldn’t be raising theirs?

     Nevertheless, in-spite of all the facts it’s the same inept 1% of groups of people who have the nerve to envisage and demand a European Union along with their New World Order of a supranational worldwide government, – when all around us it’s crumbling and tumbling down.

     Though here’s the hard facts and why you better start opening your eyes; for even though we say ‘inept’ – it’s basically long been devised to function this way.

    As it’s all to do with the continuity of maintaining control and power.

     “They” thrive by ruling and dividing the nations.  Their objectives are not to promote and sustain racial and religious harmony, as it’s deliberately contrived to provide a continuous conveyer-belt of slave workers for those 1%.

     That’s why wages are and always have been low – and for those fortunate enough to find employment the vast majority of them are being forced to live hand-to-mouth each and every day.

     It’s no different than being in an abusive relationship and why it’s time to say enough is enough and to fight back and claim what is rightly yours.

Extract from; ”Immigration, immigration, immigration!”

“Immigration, immigration, immigration” – is all that seems to be dominating the news pre and post the 2015 General Election in the UK; 

Though for those living within it all and experiencing the detrimental effects and impact mass immigration is having on their lives, villages, towns and cities, it is an ever present topic of debate; that many others – Pro-European Union have preferred to sweep under the carpet. Often branding anyone who points out “there’s simply too many ‘people’ entering the country” – as being xenophobic racists – coming-up with derisory justifications, such as ‘immigrants’ bring so much more to the table and adding to the wondrous diversity of what multiculturalism can offer. 

In many respects this can be true and why you’ll probably find the largest number of people from a whole variety of ethnic backgrounds already living the UK, than perhaps any other country in the world, especially since the UK joined the European Union in 1973. 

This is why it’s vitally important to understand this has nothing to do with xenophobia, intolerance or racism – and all to do with the math = “numbers”, nothing more, nothing less. 
It wasn’t’ until May 2014 when UKIP won seats in every region of Great Britain. The first time in over 100 years that any party other than Labour or the Conservatives have won before. The leaders of the main three political parties, after picking themselves up off the floor, soon realised the seriousness of their dilemma and soon made false promises of an ‘in or out’ referendum of the EU. 

David Cameron’s pledge to cut net immigration is in tatters as figures published 26 February 2015, reveal that the total number of people who entered the UK in the year 2014 was 624,000 – the highest on record, as was net immigration. In July 2013, the Home Office adopted an advertising campaign – billboards read: “In the UK illegally? — GO HOME OR FACE ARREST.” That many, including Nigel Farage, branded “desperate” and “nasty”. 

It is vital the British electorate fully understand the “immigration” Catch-22 facing their MPs, which is as long as the UK remains a member of the European Union – that under the non-negotiable FREE MOVEMENT OF LABOUR Articles 48 to 73, they or any other political party that comes into government are totally powerless to prevent almost any type of immigration – and that’s the crux of this immigration crisis. 

Joining the Common Market or What the Treaty of Rome Means, was a small (12cm x 18cm) 13 page booklet first published in 1967, its text has been included within this book. It attempted to forecast, inform and pre-warn the electorate back then, with a list of detrimental set of events that were forthcoming to the shores of the UK. Contemporary today than it ever was as it had the ability to see that those in power and control of the of the country had no real regard or concern as to how destructive joining the Common Market would clearly be; creating havoc and devastation to its infrastructure, workforce, housing, healthcare and education systems and even culture – and all in less than five decades. 

Some of the chapters: Deliberate Deceptions, Racist Fallacy, Lies, Damned Lies & Statistics, The Media’s Pro-Immigration Agenda, The EU – A Virtuous Conception, Referendums, Financial Crisis, WWIII, Germany, The Nazi Root of Brussels… 

Full of explosive information and finite details including proof Labours ‘open-door’ policy was deliberately contrived so as to not only try and secure future votes, but to “rub the ‘Right’s’ nose in such diversity” in the same process.