The problem with Fortune’s best companies list

From Talking Biz News

Lucy Kellaway of the Financial Times writes Sunday about the problems of Fortune magazine trying to rank the best places to work.

Kellaway writes, “The problem with Fortune’s rankings – and with all similar ones – is not that the exercise is a daft one. Actually, it is quite worthwhile. It is helpful both to prospective employees and to managers. The problem is that it makes an extremely simple thing seem fantastically complicated.

“We all know what distinguishes a good employer from a bad one. A good one provides four basic things. First, it makes sure that everyone has a proper job to do. Second, it pays them fairly. Third, it makes employees feel that their efforts are recognised. And fourth, it gives them nice people to work with. That’s all: there is nothing else.

“Fortunately, there is an easy way to measure whether a company is succeeding at these things. It doesn’t involve answering tiresome questions on long feedback forms. It does not require any examination of benefits or of corporate social responsibility policies. There is nothing subjective about the test at all.

“It simply measures how long people stay with a company. This is the only consideration that matters. Anyone who is not happy with their job will eventually go somewhere else. If most people stay put for a long time, the company automatically proves itself to be a good place to work.”

Read more here.

Any content specified as Talking Biz News content
is the intellectual property of Talking Biz News. Any copying,
republication or redistribution of such content, including by cacheing,
framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written
consent of Talking Biz News.

Read more at Talking Biz News