MIT Study: Look at the Life Cycle Before Dismissing Concrete

Concrete is literally the backbone of our infrastructure, but it often takes a bad rap for the carbon intensity of its key ingredient: cement.

Research just out of MIT’s Concrete Sustainability Hub finds that concrete has some good properties that can be overlooked if assessments of the building material do not truly look at the entire lifecycle.

And beyond that, the studies say, taking a look at how we put concrete to use can make a big difference: For example, using concrete to pave roads and highways can yield greater fuel efficiency for cars than asphalt.

While much work has been done to try to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions associated with manufacturing cement, an MIT research team examined the impacts of concrete across its lifecycle as a building material and took into account elements like use, operations and, in the case of roads, “rehabilitation.”

“Products and services have impacts throughout their life, beginning with raw materials extraction and product manufacturing, continuing through construction, operation and maintenance, and finally ending with a waste management strategy,” the study on concrete’s lifecycle in buildings said. “Conventional environmental assessments often overlook one or more of these phases, leading to incomplete results and inadequate conclusions.”

The approach MIT took on lifecycle assessment and benchmarking is as important as the findings that resulted from researchers’ extensive modeling projects on buildings and roads, reports on the research said. MIT released its studies, “Methods, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Building Life Cycle” and “Methods, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Pavement Life Cycle” last week.

John Ochsendorf, who led the research team and is an associate professor in MIT’s departments of architecture and civil and environmental engineering, described the work about midway through the projectlast year/”We are trying to create a new level of clarity and a new level of literacy about the emissions related to buildings (and roads) and ways to reduce them,”  Ochsendorf told me at the time.

Construction and maintenance of buildings are responsible for the majority of materials consumption in the U.S., and buildings account for about 40 percent of national energy use and about the same percentage of greenhouse gas emissions.

http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2011/08/15/mit-weighs-lifecycle-impact-concrete

SMARTBRIEF.COM