Geoengineering: Assessing the Implications of Large-Scale Climate Intervention

A 2009 US House of Representatives hearing mentions how there would be no more blue skies if geoengineering programs were to persist.

By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
December 13, 2012

In November of 2009 a geoengineering hearing took place in the US House of Representatives. In the hearing the committee addressed the need for Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and how productive it is as an investment.

Lee Lane a “Resident Fellow” and Head of the AEI Geoengineering Project wanted the US government to study (SRM) in detail saying, “it is the first and third most productive kinds of investment that can be made in dealing with climate change” 

Lane says, “we need to balance and manage the risks of SRM studies”.

For the most part the committee concluded that global warming is a problem, and that geoengineering is only a temporary solution.

In the discussion they also mention, who decides the temperature of the planet, Russia, China, or the US? It was also brought up that it would be nearly impossible to get the geoengineering particulates into the stratosphere and very costly. All the while the byproduct would be grey skies.

US House of Representatives | Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
November 05, 2009

*****

Read more articles by this author HERE.

Shepard Ambellas is the founder & director of theintelhub.com (a popular alternative news website), researcher, investigative journalist, radio talk show host, and filmmaker.

Follow Shepard on Twitter/NotForSale2NWO.

Watch and subscribe to Shepard on Youtube.com/user/NotForSale2NWO.

Please feel free to checkout SHADEtheMotionPicture.com (An Ambellas & Bermas Film).

Join theintelhub.com FORUMS to Talk About Articles Like This One - ENTER NOW