The Incarnation of the Word of God (aka “the birth of Jesus”) and the..definition of money?

Christ versus the lie of free will and versus the definition of money based on the lie of free will

What does the Incarnation of the Word of God have to do with the definition of money in the public mind?  Is it, as many have supposed and many so-called Christians claim to this day that “He could have done other things and made lots of money, given his talents but he chose instead to die for our sins”? To this day, many preachers claim to have talents that they could theoretically use to enrich themselves so that they may appear to be patri-sacrificers for others. The unstated theory is that money is a true blessing and that worldly riches are a legitimate right of man to possess as a blessing and as empowerment of a type of genius for manipulating one’s environment.

God knows better.

An empowerment device to supposedly prove “choice is being done” (money) cannot exist without the lie of free will and the lie of free will cannot exist without the appearance of a total lack of new creation as the norm and only possible state of all reality. Not only so, but the lie of free will itself is nothing more than a judgement paradigm applied after the fact in order to seem to ‘have had’ the experience of absolute freedom from God and so to look forward to a future experience of the same. Money is just a further device as a supposed physical representation to make the lie seem concrete as a bit of theater.

Jesus Christ is the Word of God. He was the pre-Incarnate Word of all eternity that became simultaneously the Son of God and the Incarnate Word of God. He is Creating Speech as the Word of God, the same Word that God Spoke and said “Let there be light and there was light.” etc. What He speaks comes into being because and only because He Spoke it into existence. Nothing exists that exists except that God made it and made it by Hos acts of Himself as Speech/Word/Christ/Jesus.

So the theory that Christ “could have been wealthy, but chose instead to be poor” is nothing more than giving the right hand to Satan when that poverty is confused with monetary and earthly wealth. Christ became Incarnate, among other reasons, to instigate and begin the new birth of us as brethren in Him as completely and totally free from the non-creating speech/anti-Christ He had Himself confounded at Babel. It is ALWAYS the non-creating speech as a rule with no exceptions that claims free will for men and those who “preach” as if sent from God for grace who pretend to have found free will in their Bibles only do so after they have implicitly claimed that all speech and the only possible speech in total reality is the speech God confounded at Babel and as if it had not been confounded.

An idealized lack of new creation produces a mindset of scarcity that is of absolute necessity in order to have a set of non-creating measurements that is then applied to those things idealized to be scarce in order to seem to have intelligently and “fairly” parsed them out to men. One is then said to ‘be rich’ among such deceived people by having a substantially larger portion that is necessary for life and safety or to ‘be poor’ when one has only what is falsely perceived to be absolutely necessary or lacks even that. ‘What is necessary’ is defined by lying measurements and the lie of free will is then used to divide brethren against themselves on the notion that each one has absolute freedom from God to do as they please and specifically to do as they please within in the defined parameters of the common scarcity. While in truth there is plenty, no matter how much one person or group has, the appearance of a large disparity of necessary stuff –in the midst of a perceived environment of a total lack of new creation–is most needed to set them against each other.

In the midst of such lies being the spirit of the times, no one turns to God in Jesus Christ to make new things as God does it through them; everyone instead fights over falsely perceived necessary things that are scarce and which in some fashion must be taken from each other.

The lie that Christ “could have been rich but chose to be poor” “because He loves the poor” in order to merely make those who have less stuff in the lie of free will and its lack of new creation as norm is just as evil as trying to say “God loves the rich more than the poor” because the rich do not suffer the worst derision to be had within the overall lie as do the poor and to make it appear as if God’s righteousness has anything at all to do with the emotional common sense to be found in the lie of free will and its scarcity.

Christ came to utterly annihilate the non-creating speech/anti-Christ and to save the elect from the wrath of God on that exact anti-Christ and all associated partners with it. Christ didn’t just ‘not use’ money or those subject to money or those subject in any way to the lie of free will and the merchants within it. He came to destroy them and their ‘economics’. He came to save the elect from all false measurement systems, to include those applied after the fact of every event they can recognize as having happened in order to make it seem they had successfully gotten away from God’s power and God’s love by the widget of saying they had free will in a speech that is not-God.

Christ’s definition of money is that He creates and you receive. That’s it. No scarcity; no you running after worldly money or its items; no confederacy with those that do; no you being subject to those that do and whose only speech is the speech God confounded at Babel.

Nowhere in the following Spirit and Life is there to be found the phrase “and they said “Let there be a tower and there was a tower”. Instead we see anti-Christ pretending anti-Christ didn’t exist and making the people build a tower to itself with their blood and sweat until God said “Stop working them like that..”

Liars who claim ‘I could be making lots of money but I’m foregoing that blessing to be a preacher to you and you ought to thank me for it’ are just slaves of a speech that can create nothing and without exception all claim you and they have free will.

Merry Christmas.

Genesis 11:1-9  And the whole earth had one language, and the same words.  And it came to pass as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and dwelt there.  And they said one to another, Come on, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and they had asphalt for mortar.  And they said, Come on, let us build ourselves a city and a tower, the top of which may reach to the heavens; and let us make ourselves a name, lest we be scattered over the face of the whole earth.  And Jehovah came down to see the city and the tower which the children of men built.  And Jehovah said, Behold, the people is one, and have all one language; and this have they begun to do. And now will they be hindered in nothing that they meditate doing.  Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.  And Jehovah scattered them thence over the face of the whole earth. And they left off building the city.   Therefore was its name called Babel; because Jehovah there confounded the language of the whole earth. And Jehovah scattered them thence over the face of the whole earth.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Filed under: Calvinism, cult of scarcity, determinism, free will, Governance, Jesus Christ, objections against Calvinism answered, personal witness, religion, results of non-creating speech and the logic therein, the Gospel of Jesus Christ in contemporary issues, Ways of God