Meet the Person Who Can Remotely Crash Planes and Can Read Your Mind

MONSTROUS PATENT CALLS PEOPLE “WET WARE”

IMPLANTED DEVICES DELIVER ELECTRIC SHOCK, POISONS, DOPAMINE, ADRENALINE, EMIT MIND CONTROL FREQUENCIES

HEWLETT-PACKARD & AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES ARE COMPLICIT

 PDF | https://tinyurl.com/y7rj2xfy

Approx. width of a quarter

FIG. 1–RICHARD C. WALKER, AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES (PALO ALTO, CA) HOLDS MONSTROUS “INTERNET OF THINGS” PATENTS THAT CAN TAKE DOWN PLANES WITH REMOTE INSTRUCTIONS TO ONE LITTLE QRS-11 SENSOR IN THE AUTOPILOT SYSTEM. The global surveillance grid includes embedded chips in planes, devices, equipment and people to remotely send signals and control every element of The Internet of Things network. The QRS-11 quartz rate sensor (the diameter of a quarter; also see AbelDanger.org for more detail on the uninterruptable autopilot) is embedded in most aircraft autopilots. The intelligence version of the sensor can be turned off remotely and bring down the plane. In the late 1980′s and early 1990′s, 

Hillary Clinton’s Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas was the original attorney representing the inventor of the QRS-11 sensor in BEI Electronics/Technologies (US Pat. Nos. 3,974,428; 3,976,997; 4,628,298). This sensor was so critical to national security that the State Department fined Boeing $16 million for illegal exports. After many mergers and company sales, the rights to the QRS-11 went to France for a decade owned by Schneider Electric SA. Schneider sold the rights to a Barclays Bank client in London. The Rose Law Partner who hired Hillary, J. Joseph Giroiri, 

served on the BEI Technologies board of directors. He also coordinated the Clinton’s China and Indonesia banking connections associated with their Mena, Arkansas drug smuggling, money laundering and sex trafficking.

Barclays then sold the company and the QRS-11 patent rights to Sensata, Inc. which is controlled by Mitt Romney’s Goldman Sachs-aligned Bain Capital in Boston. Tellingly, dozens of former Clinton staff have died in mysterious airplane and vehicle crashes. Also telling, the late FBI Superstar Ted Gunderson, said in 2005 that Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVay had a bio chip surgically installed in him by Dr. Louis Jolyon “Jolly” West who led the rogue C.I.A.’s MKUltra mind control program. Conveniently for Bill and Hillary, the Oklahoma City bombing destroyed the records of the FBI investigation on Janet Reno’s WACO criminality. The bombing also killed former Clinton chief of security Alan G. Whicher. Four other Clinton’s bodyguards (C. LeBleu/T., T. McKeaham,, R. Williams,, S. Willis) were shot in the head by a helicopter sniper at the illegal military siege of the Branch Davidian property in Waco, Texas (1993). Some call these deaths “Arkancide” since most everyone associated with the Clintons in Arkansas, except Larry Nichols, have died. Nichols produced The Clinton Chronicles (1994) to expose the Clinton devilish corruption. Despite ill health, Larry carries on the struggle to bring the Clintons to justice.

Bookmark: #ieee-patent-fraud | https://tinyurl.com/yc54h8pw
UPDATE! JAN. 16, 2018
ETHERNET ENGINEERS—WHISTLEBLOW!

Most computer engineers have no idea how the IEEE 802.3 data transmission Ethernet standard was developed (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). We have just discovered that it was shoved down our throats by Deep State shadow government forces intent on controlling the Internet as a global spy grid and corporatist profit machine. Richard C. Walker a.k.a Rick Walker was a stooge for Agilent Technologies who was evidently tapped by the Highlands Group to seize control of technology standards needed for the takeover. This post contains hard, indictable evidence that proves the identities of the corporatists involved with HP/Agilent, including 3Com, Qualcomm, Broadcom, Cisco, IBM, Sun, Intel, NTT (Japan Telephone), Cielo, Quake, nSerial, Nortel, World Wide Packets. See Jul. 10, 2000 IEEE meeting slides where Walker’s pushes standards proposed on Mar. 06, 2000—the same day he filed for a patent (became U.S. Pat. No. 6,718,491) on the same slides. Mindspring engineer Roy Bynumcomplained that Walker was railroading the standard. Of course, after filing his patent, Walker had a vested interest in having it become the IEEE standard for data transmission. It did, to this day.

Patents last for 20 years from the time they are filed. Walker assigned it to HP/Agilent Technologies. Then inexplicably, on Jun. 24, 2013, the Patent Office allowed an almost identical patent U.S. Pat. No. 9,451,057 on the 802.3 Ethernet standard by a subsidiary of Marvell International, Ltd. thru inventor Brett A. McClellan, a Bahamian corporation with offices in Colorado.The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) overrode the Examiner Eric A. Myers (Art Unit 2474) who had ruled that Marvell’s filing was doubly unpatenable as being essentially a copy of Walker’s earlier dubious Ethernet patents. Walker filed eleven (11) patents assigned to Hewlett-Packard and fourteen (14) assigned toAgilent Technologies, Inc. The PTAB overruled Examiner Myers and awarded it to McClellan/Marvell anyway, void of substantive reasons, the PTAB (secret three-judge internal patent court) magically accepted ALL of Marvell’s previously rejected novelty arguments. Therefore, Marvell’s value appears to be fraudulent, yet they claim control of the 802.3 Ethernet standard driving all Internet data transmission. This evident corruption in the U.S. Patent Office shows it has become nothing but a rubber stamp for corporatists, and not a protector of American inventors.

LISTEN TO THIS BOMBSHELL VIDEO WHILE YOU READ THE REST OF THIS POST | SPREAD THE WORD

https://youtu.be/PIIbqNQj8Is

(JAN. 11, 2017)—What AFI and American Intelligence Media (AIM) researchers have just discovered is breathtaking, disgusting, astounding and monstrous. It is also shocking how far along the plan is. Amazingly, the Deep State shadow government, in its evident hubris, has fully disclosed their diabolical technology scheme for “The Internet of Things” in writing.

The patent actually says that their plan is to identify, tag, track and control literally everything on the planet. Their unquestioned plan is to embed micro-electronic control devices, either surgically or by injection, in every human being on the planet. To them, it’s all about “management of the world’s resources” including you. Walker Patent No. 6,965,816 Col. 118, Lns. 53-54.

Why would they publish these plans? They evidently believed that these documents would not surface until after they had seized control.

UNBELIEVABLY, YOU ARE JUST “WET-WARE”

These documents show that their authors have a total disdain for humanity. These define people as “wet-ware.” In this world view, a human is merely a silicon chip surrounded by a membrane of carbon and water.

Bookmark: #wet-ware | https://tinyurl.com/yc3rnfbc

These are the people who are planning to take over the world.

Read for yourself:
Here are two lines captured from the actual patent:

FIG. 2–U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, Col. 3, Lns. 5-6.

“PFN” means Protected Primary Focal Node. “TRAC” means Trusted Remote Activity Controller.

The illustrations in Walker’s patent are truly dystopian (a community or society that is undesirable and/or frightening)—and they have been implemented! Their message is clear: “you can run but you cannot hide.” In this illustration, even the trees are watching you! Here is Figure 21 from Walker’s patent.

Bookmark: #blanket-surveillance | https://tinyurl.com/yabtllwb

Click image to enlarge

FIG. 3–U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816, Fig. 21.

PATENTS ARE INTENTIONALLY ARCANE AND HARD TO UNDERSTAND

For example, “inequitable conduct” means fraud, “prosecute” means make filings, “on-sale bar” means sell an invention too soon, “Markman” handles technical definitions, “pro hac vice” means an out-of-state attorney, “pro se” means means represent yourself, and so on.

Patent lingo insulates the “old boy” club of patent lawyers and judges from We The People accountability.

Bookmark: #patent-tutorial | https://tinyurl.com/ycsmq78w

CATEGORIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Patents are a form of intellectual property alongside trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and trade dress. Here’s a thumbnail tutorial.

Trade secrets are anything you do or think that is not publicly known that you have taken reasonable means to protect, like the way you solve a problem or build something.

Copyrights are your thoughts reduced to some medium like pen, paper, program or design, like books, artwork, type or manuscripts.

Trademarks are unique names, phrases and other expressions used in commerce and assigned to you in order to avoid confusion in your marketplace. For example, it would be confusing to have two companies in your state with the same names.

Trade dress is the sum total of the way something is designed, like the unique colors and style used in a franchised store design and product packaging.

Finally, patents are unique and “nonobvious” inventions, methods and designs. Patents do not have to be working to be patentable. They just have to be described well enough to be repeatable by a person of “ordinary skill in the art.” We’ll describe what this means below.

PATENTS ARE UNIQUELY PROTECTED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

Patents and copyrights are the only two property rights specifically protected by the U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8. Indeed, the Founders protected inventors because new ideas are essential to creating new wealth. They also knew that innovations are fragile flowers that would otherwise be hijacked by greed, power and wealth if not protected.

Tragically, the patent system has been hijacked by many corrupt lawyers and judges who themselves steal from real inventors and grow rich in the process.

PATENTS ARE A PROPERTY DEED AND CONTRACT

A patent is a contract and a property deed. The contract is between We The People and the inventor. We give the inventor twenty years to exploit his or her idea for the benefit of society and to be rewarded for sharing the invention with the public.

The patent document itself describes the innovation. It’s like the “four corners” of a physical property deed (e.g., survey, terrain, frontage, roads, vegetation, water, drainage, utilities). Similarly, a patent describes an inventor’s new idea in words and diagrams.

A patent must contain enough detail to enable a third party with “ordinary skill in the art” to replicate it . . .  ostensibly for the benefit of society. The expectation is that third party will license the underlying patent in the process of adding value to it.

RICHARD WALKER’S PATENT COULD NOT WORK WITHOUT LEADER TECHNOLOGIES’ SOCIAL NETWORKING INVENTION, SO THEY STOLE IT

Walker has not licensed the invention of social networking from Leader Technologies. Instead, as this Walker patent reveals, they just stole it.

Indeed, Walker’s patent would not have worked on the large scale they describe without Leader social networking invention. We’ll show that below.

Here’s the proof.

“Art” means the field of the invention, like computer hardware, software, furniture, machinery, medical device, pharmaceutical, consumer product, office product, tool, manufacturing method, agricultural implement, vehicle type, etc.

The Patent Office uses the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) for the tens of thousands of “art” classifications. An inventor must describe his/her invention in enough detail so that one of ordinary skill in the patent classification being described can replicate it.

The Walker patent discussed below identified both U.S. and International industry classifications. See also “How do I read a patent? – the Front Page.”

Bookmark: #monstrous-walker-patents | https://tinyurl.com/y8jrkzlm

A MONSTROUS FAMILY OF PATENTS

We recently uncovered U.S. Patent Number 6,965,816 (10.9 MB) awarded on Nov. 15, 2005 to the named sole inventor Richard C. Walker titled:

“PFN/TRAC System FAA Upgrades For Accountable Remote and Robotics Control To Stop The Unauthorized Use of Aircraft and to Improve Equipment Management and Public Safety in Transportation.”

While this patent focuses on aircraft, it is written so broadly as to encompass all kinds of equipment and devices, including people, defined as “wet-ware.”

While the patent was issued on Nov. 15, 2005, it incorporates filings going all the way back to Dec. 2, 1996.

Most patents incorporate provisional patents and related technology upon which they rely. AFI and American Intelligence Media (AIM) researchers cataloged those claims for this patent below. Several critical pieces of information emerge.

First, these patents to remotely control vehicles started being filed within two months of the passage of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) during Bill Clinton’s first term. The EEA was written by law professor James P. Chandler, III.

Robert Mueller, James Comey, Rod Rosenstein, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Larry Summers were strategically positioned at the top of the Justice Department and Treasury. The patentee, Richard C. Walker, could have patented a ham sandwich had this group wanted it.

Second, the evident intent of the Walker patent was to illustrate the technology planned for control of everything—The Internet of Things.

THEIR JUSTIFICIATION: The benevolent control of vehicles and aircraft in hijack situations was merely the cover story for the development of a global surveillance grid on everyone and everything. Given the timing of these Walker filings (around 9/11), one is increasingly skeptical about who really caused 9/11.

Third, Robert S. Mueller’s law firm, Wilmer Hale LLP, formerly Hale & Dorr LLP, drove Walker’s filings. Mueller was sworn in as FBI director just seven days before 9/11. This clearly implicates Wilmer Hale in the treachery.

Fourth, the global data sharing platform described in the patent was not doable by the likes of IBM, Microsoft, Boeing, AT&T and Cisco. They were all behind the curve from an R&D perspective when the Internet emerged. For example, Bill Gates thought it was a fad. The telephone pager network that Walker described could not scale to the volumes required for such global communication.

James P. Chandler surely could not believe his luck, when, in early 2000, Michael McKibben of Leader Technologies was first introduced to him. Leader was looking for the best patent attorney in the country to protect its social networking innovations.

Chandler, on the other hand, needed a fix for the Deep State’s ailing digital takeover master plan. He agreed immediately to be Leader’s patent attorney. He then spent the next three years deceiving Leader until he was able to get his hands on the underlying engineering source code, which he immediately shuffled to the IBM Eclipse Foundation where DOJ’s Eric Holder and IBM’s David Kappos were waiting, along with Cisco, Microsoft, SAP, Oracle, Kleiner Perkins, Qualcomm, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, AT&T and a host of other rogue C.I.A. providers.

Leader’s source code was essential to building The Internet of Things, quickly.

The table below shows the patent filings included in the PFN/TRAC System FAA. The eventual patent focused on remote control of aircraft, but also subsumed control of vehicles, ships, equipment, commerce, education and people.

Bookmark: #walker-patent-lineage | https://tinyurl.com/ya4kfso2

STORY SOURCE