Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Red Flags All Around

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.



 

The Burning Platform

John Hussman explains the scam that is being perpetrated in the housing market by the Wall Street banks and our government overlords. 

The Data-Generating Process

John P. Hussman, Ph.D.

For anyone who works to infer information from a broad range of evidence, one of the important aspects of the job is to think carefully about the structure of the data – what is sometimes called the “data-generating process.” Data doesn’t just drop from the sky or out of computer. It is generated by some process, and for any sort of data, it is critical to understand how that process works.

For example, one of the moments of market excitement last week was the reported jump in new housing starts for September. But later in the week, investors learned that there was a slump in existing home sales as well. If you just take those two data points as independent pieces of information, it’s not clear exactly what we should conclude about housing. But the story is clearer once we consider the process that generates that data.

One part of the process is purely statistical. The housing data that is reported each month actually uses monthly data at an annual rate, so the jump from 758,000 to 852,000 housing starts at an annual rate actually works out to a statement that “During September, in an economy of about 130 million homes, about 100 million which are single detached units, a total of 9,500 more homes were started than in August – a fluctuation that is actually in the range of month-to-month statistical noise, but does bring recent activity to a recovery high.” Now, in prior recessions, the absolute low was about 900,000 starts on an annual basis, rising toward 2 million annual starts over the course of the recovery. The historical peak occurred in 1972 near 2.5 million starts, but the period leading up to 2006 was the longest sustained increase without a major drop. In the recent recovery, housing starts bottomed at 478,000 in early 2009, so we’ve clearly seen a recovery in starts. But the present level is still so low that it has previously been observed only briefly at the troughs of prior recessions.

The second part of the process is the important to the question of what is sustainable. Here the question to ask is how and why does a decision to “start” a house occur? According to CoreLogic, about 22% of mortgages are underwater, with mortgage debt that exceeds the market value of the home. Likewise, banks have taken millions of homes into their own “real-estate owned” or REO portfolios, and have dribbled that inventory into the market at a very gradual rate. All of that means that the availability of existing homes for sale is far smaller than the actual inventory of homes that would be available if underwater homeowners were able, or banks were willing, to sell. Accordingly, much of the volume in “existing home sales” represents foreclosure sales, REO and short-sales (sales allowed by banks for less than the value of the outstanding mortgage). That constrained supply of homes available for sale is one reason why home prices have held up. At the same time, constrained supply means that new home buyers face higher prices and fewer choices for existing homes than they would if the market was actually clearing properly. Given those facts, buyers who are able to secure financing (or pay cash) often find it more desirable to build to their preference instead of buying an existing home. It’s not clear how many of these starts represent “spec” building by developers, but it’s interesting to note that the average time to sell a newly completed home has been rising, not falling, over the past year.

In the end, the data-generating process features millions of underwater homes, huge REO inventories, and yet constrained supply. The result is more stable home prices, but a misallocation of capital into new homes despite a glut of existing homes that cannot or will not be brought to market. So starts are up even though existing home sales are down. Inefficient or not, there’s no indication that inventory will be abruptly spilled into the market, so if the slow dribble continues, we’ll probably continue to see gradual growth in housing starts that competes with a gradual release of inventory. This isn’t an indication of economic resilience or housing “liftoff,” but is instead an indication of market distortion and misallocation of scarce capital. Housing starts increased off of a low base during the 1969-70 and 1981-82 recessions as well. Still, this is unlikely to materially affect the course of what we continue to believe is a new recession today.

In the financial markets, the data-generating process is often very misunderstood. Investors often seem to believe that prices go higher because money comes “into” the market like air filling a balloon. But the actual process is that every dollar that comes into the market in the hands of a buyer is a dollar that leaves a moment later in the hands of a seller. So the data-generating process is dominated not by money-flow but by subjective eagerness to own stocks. Regardless of whether stocks are highly desired or utterly loathed, every share of stock, once issued, has to be held by some investor until that share is somehow retired. Stocks can never be over-owned or under-owned.

On that subject, a number of Wall Street analysts have argued that the increasing amount of investor assets in bond funds, relative to stock funds, is an indication that stocks are under-owned and that investors are overly bearish about equities. If one believes that the data is generated by money just “flowing” into stocks versus bonds, that’s a tempting conclusion. But again, the actual data-generating process is that every share of stock has to be held by someone, as does every bond certificate. The large amount of money being held in the form of bonds says simply that a huge amount of debt has been issued by both corporations and governments, and somebody has to hold it. With yields at record lows, those bonds are being held at very high valuations with little prospective return for the risk involved. The enormous volume of debt being held at high valuations should be a red flag for bond market investors, but is it a green flag for stocks?

According to Ned Davis Research, stock market capitalization as a share of GDP is presently about 105%, versus a historical average of about 60% (and only about 50% if you exclude the bubble period since the mid-1990’s). Market cap as a fraction of GDP was about 80% before the 73-74 market plunge, and about 86% before the 1929 crash. 105% is not depressed. Presently, market cap is elevated because stocks seem reasonable as a multiple of recent earnings, but earnings themselves are at the highest share of GDP in history. Valuations are wicked once you normalize for profit margins. Given that stocks are very, very long-lived assets, it is the long-term stream of cash flows that matters most – not just next year’s earnings. Stock valuations are not depressed as a share of the economy. Rather, they are elevated because they assume that the highest profit margins in history will be sustained indefinitely (despite those profit margins being dependent on massive budget deficits – see Too Little to Lock In for the accounting relationships on this). In my view, there are red flags all around.

Ultimately, what benefits stocks is a movement from being utterly loathed to being highly desired. Once that has occurred – once stocks are overvalued, overbought, and investors are overbullish, one has to rely on the idea that even more eager investors will enter the fray, and take those shares off the hands of already speculative holders. In general, the data-generating process produces the extreme of an advance exactly at the same time that it produces the highest confidence about the continuation of the advance. It produces the extreme of a decline exactly at the same time that it produces the greatest fear about the continuation of the decline. As a result, the point that investors are most inclined to think about the market in terms of the “trend” is exactly when they should be thinking about the market in terms of the “cycle.”

Keep in mind that the bear-market portion of the market cycle typically wipes out more than half of the gains achieved during the bull-market portion. During “secular” bear market periods, the cyclical bear markets wipe out closer to 80% of the prior bull market advances. Risk-management is very forgiving of missed gains in late-stage bull markets. The lack of risk-management is equally punishing to investors who overstay.

The most recent cycle has been unique, from my perspective, because the point where one normally could accept the opportunity for an aggressive stance in post-war data (reasonable valuations coupled with a favorable shift in trend-following measures) was also the point where the relevance of post-war data came into question. Depression-era data became very relevant, and our own response was to ensure that our methods could navigate extreme market fluctuations regardless of which environment we were facing. We’ve addressed that “two data sets” uncertainty – and will not face that issue again even under identical conditions in the future – but the most constructive portion of the past market cycle is also behind us.

As a side note, I should emphasize that trend-following measures are an important and valuable component of our analysis of market action, but it’s incorrect to believe that simple moving-average crossover methods have been wildly effective over the long-term; particularly since April 2010, which is the last time that our present ensemble methods would have indicated a favorable return/risk profile for the S&P 500. Notably, even the popular trend-following strategy of buying the S&P 500 when it is above its 200-day moving-average has had a net loss since April 2010, including dividends, and even ignoring transaction costs. Trading the 50-day moving-average broke even. The luckiest cross-over strategy turned out to be the 17-week moving-average, which would have gained about 14% since April 2010, ignoring transaction costs, but that same strategy would have historically lagged a buy-and-hold approach even before slippage, so there would have been no basis to prefer it in 2010.

At present, we have little reason to believe that the data-generating process we are observing here is anything “out-of-sample” from the standpoint of a century of historical evidence. We presently have an overvalued, overbought (intermediate-term), overbullish market featuring a variety of syndromes that have typically appeared in the “exhaustion” part of the market cycle: elevated valuation multiples on normalized earnings, emerging divergences in market internals, an increasingly tepid economic backdrop, market prices near the upper Bollinger bands at monthly and weekly resolutions, and other factors that – taken in aggregate – have historically been associated with very weak average market outcomes.

Yes, the Federal Reserve has continued its program of quantitative easing, but here, I am convinced that we understand the data-generating process by which QE has impacted stock prices – namely, by creating an ocean of zero-interest money that acts as a “hot potato,” encouraging investors to seek riskier securities until all assets are so overvalued that their prospective returns compete with zero-interest money. At that point, the zero-interest money (which has to be held by someone) is just passively held, and acts as no further stimulant to prices. QE has had its effects at points when prices have declined deeply over the prior 6-month period, and I suspect that any major future effort will work only until investors realize that this manipulation of their risk preferences is all that quantitative easing is capable of achieving. On this point, I fully agree with PIMCO’s Bill Gross, who tweeted last week “The crash on Oct 19 1987 showed that portfolio insurance puts were dangerous. R central bank ‘puts’ in the same category? Very likely.”

continue at The Burning Platform:

Fair Use Notice: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makingsuch material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any suchcopyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest inreceiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that gobeyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 4 comments
    • Old Harry

      This is the best article ever printed on this site concerning economic information.. I applaud you for actually reporting something that contains more than just sensation. Good work guys.

    • NTT

      Red flag or bloody flag?

    • hungry4food

      What was going on in the world leading up to the 1929 crash was the same as is going on today , and it was not until after WW2 that the world began to Expand massively Food and energy productions .
      We are at this type of event again …. The Home Mortgage crisis was a excuse to stop all forms of credit to slow and stop development and hold in suspense a world population while these globalists figure out what it is they are going to try and do going forward .
      Some would like to do this UN Agenda 21 Sustainable development policy , http://oneway2day.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/wildlands-map-2010_merrit.jpg

      There is about 3 Billion acres of farmable land in the world when you convert hectares ,
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arable_land , http://www.asknumbers.com/HectaresToAcresConversion.aspx .

      Problem is based off Rate of Consumption and production predictions , People eat almost a Ton of food a year , and the Farmable lands in the world that produce grain have been flat lining in increased production over the last 15 years and at the same time we have added 1 Billion people to Earth , so this has the elite flipping out and that’s why we have seen a compete Global Financial crash and credit taken away , the Home mortgage crisis was just a Good excuse to bring credit development down without causing a uprising of this being seen as suppression , http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.YLD.CREL.KG .

      This breaks down the production and consumption rates in a Eye opening list of phenomenal facts , http://www.wheatworld.org/wheat-info/fast-facts/

      Bio tech crops are on the rise and so is resistance to them for health reasons .
      http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/02/biotech-crops-reach-160-million.html

      We really need a Business person who can restructure the tax code to promote supply-side expansion in key areas we face food inflation in soon or we will most certainly loose our free market system to a Nationalized economy and oh what that could end up looking like if this is not addressed soon . With the Looming Threat of Food shortages on the Horizon Can you trust this president has the best interests of the American People in his policies , Why Hasn’t President Obama placed More effort into developing this Energy ???

      Can you trust this president has the best interests of the American People in his policies or maybe cause he’s just using unsustainable ideas like wind and solar to create a Insolvent end to the Capital system with a Unconvertible debt to equity contract because you hate with envy an economic system that does not allow favors based on ideological perceptions of how society should function ?

      http://libertyinvestor.com/2012/10/22/energy-from-the-earths-core/

      And could we use this technology and renewable energy to power and expand the food shortage supply that’s coming, see here , http://personalliberty.com/2012/10/22/food-scarcity-a-ticking-time-bomb/ , to innovate these alternative technologies to Feed the world and bring peace with food like JFK did , http://foodaid.org/food-aid-programs/food-for-peace/ , Where is President Obamas Policies like this that can help people with something REAL ???

      U.S. Government Warns: High Food Prices To Hit Americans Hard

      We have the technology to Solve this Near Future Disaster that Looms !!!!! http://www.foddersolutions.com , http://www.verticalfarm.com

      This makes absolutely no sense at all , Obama is wrong on this Policy !!!! Scroll down to the segment about : “ Regulations “ Where Senator Mike Johanns Talks about a Obama regulation COST PER YEAR of 1.75 Trillion , http://www.agweb.com/farmjournal/article/where_the_candidates_stand_on_agriculture/

    • Anonymous

      HORAY,HORAY for the queen of england and the rothchilds of england they have screwed america again……….everyone get down and kiss the queens feet now,she has screwed america again,throw your young children on the fire,we need a sacrafice for the queen,other wise she’ll turn our military lose on us, we must obey,NOTICE: anyone not deleting truthful comments about the queen will be throw into a FEMA camp,where life won’t be happy all the time…………………..

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.