Syria Could Become a Rallying Point Against the Banksters

Dave Hodges * The Common Sense Show

For a brief moment, Obama and his banker bosses met the world and the world punched Obama in the mouth. Through our collective efforts, with regard to Syria, average people have made every elitist banker blink and these gangsters have temporarily backed up. However a man’s work is never done, because what do military historians advise generals to do following a big victory? They advise them to follow up on that victory and smash their enemy. This is precisely what humanity needs to do with regard to the recent positive events involving Obama’s plans to attack Syria.

We Have Bought About Two Months Of Time

Both my insider sources and some of my prominent colleagues in the alternative media are now reporting that Obama may have to wait as long as eight weeks, or more, to launch a decisive military strike against Syria. To our foreign friends and our fellow countrymen, I say take a bow as we have won some breathing room, but we must press on.

Syrian Officials Waste No Time Claiming Victory

Syria’s official newspaper, al-Thawra, stated in a front-page editorial on Saturday that “Obamaannounced yesterday, directly or through implication, the beginning of the historic American retreat.” Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdadstated that Obama is showing signs of indecision. Even the British Parliament rejected the Obama war initiative against Syria.

Recent polls show that American citizens are against this war by a 9 to 1 ratio. One of the major players in what was to be the upcoming attacks, France, has been clamoring for war against Syria for quite some time. France loss control over Syria in 1946 as they were unable to hold onto their colony following World War II. Of course, the French have not won a military battle since the early 19th century and with Obama meeting significant roadblocks, they are unwilling to enter the conflict alone. This is a wise choice for the French, because they simply couldn’t fight their way out of a wet paper bag. For the moment, the Assad led Syrian government remains in power.

The Beginning of Syrian Normalcy?

Since Obama has waffled on attacking Syria this past weekend, Syria has somewhat returned to normal, or at least as normal as things could be under the dire circumstances that the United States has placed Syria under. However, any news of peace is not welcome news to the globalist-serving minions such as Secretary of State, John Kerry, who stated that sarin gas has been found in chemical weapons residue in Damascus and this implicates Assad as being the source of the chemical weapons attack. That is like saying that a gun has been found at the scene of a homicide and the ownership of the gun can be ascribed to whatever political enemy deemed necessary. But apparently, that is Secretary Kerry’s story and he is sticking with it. Yet, Kerry’s logic is so horribly flawed. Why would Assad do the one thing that would allow the United States and her allies to wage war on Syria based on a pretext provided by Assad himself? Further, the chemical weapons attack occurred in a residential area under the control of the rebels. Assad is not stupid and he would never hand a loaded gun to Obama. Further, the chemical weapons target, had no military value. In other words, there was nothing to gain for Assad to have launched the attack. However, we should not confuse Obama and Kerry with the facts.

There is also nothing, in reality, for America to gain by attacking Syria. Fourteen hundred people died in chemical weapons attacks. How many more Syrian people will an Obama air campaign kill? Would it be 10,000, 50,000, 100,000 or two million? Because Assad is falsely accused of killing 1,400 of his own people, then does this give Obama the right to kill tens of thousands of Syrians in response? And the American people are seriously listening to this nonsensical reasoning?

There is one decisive question that has never been asked and answered in all the discussions that I have read with regard to the chemical weapons attacks. If Obama was facing an overthrow at home, does anyone seriously think that he would not hesitate to use chemical weapons against his potential enemies, the American people? What does this say about the quality of our leadership when Kerry and Obama are not even clever enough to fabricate a believable cover story.

The Real Culprit

It is obvious to most neutral observers that the most that the CIA backed al-Qaeda led rebels could hope to achieve in the Syrian Civil War, was a stalemate. Consequently, Obama needed a game changer because, as I have pointed out in several recent articles, the bankers are holding no less than six Watergate-type scandals (e.g. Benghazi) over Obama’s head as they blackmail him into producing results in the Middle East, which will culminate in saving the petrodollar.

The game changing event that Obama needed appears to most of us in the alternative media to consist of a false flag chemical weapons attack which could be used to implicate Assad.Of course, in this scenario, this event would be followed by military strikes which would be launched against Syria and a regime change would surely take place.

The United Nations can investigate the event all they want, however, they will never be able to determine which side did it to any degree of certainty unless they are in on the fix. 

continue article here:

http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/09/02/syria-could-become-a-rallying-point-against-the-banksters/