Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The Potential ‘Gold Trigger’ That Probably Isn’t on Your Radar

Monday, November 28, 2016 5:46
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

On May 6, President Obama passed a historically important milestone for which there was no fanfare or jubilation…
He has now been at war longer than any other American president.
With the end of his second term just weeks away, Obama will become the first U.S. president to have been at war for the entirety of his administration.
I see no reason to expect anything different for President-elect Donald Trump.
War is the most destructive and expensive thing that humans have ever devised. The consequences can be devastating to the individuals who fight and their families. It's also true, however, that war is big business. Military contractors, like Lockheed Martin (LMT) and Raytheon (RTN), have thrived during the Obama administration. But war also has another beneficiary…
In the table below, notice how gold prices responded to increased war spending and federal budget deficits between 2001 and 2012 – and to the slowed growth between 2013 and 2016. (All figures are estimates.)
2001-2005
2006-2012
2013-2016
War Spending
$209 billion
$1.1 trillion
$333 billion
Additions to Deficit
$1.1 trillion
$6.0 trillion
$2.2 trillion
Change in Gold Price
+120%
+260%
-28%
Sources: The Balance; USgovernmentspending.com; StockCharts
Between 2001 and 2016, war-related appropriations totaled $1.7 trillion. Around 65% of this was spent during the height of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, between 2006 and 2012.
Two months ago, the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs prepared a comprehensive analysis of war-related spending through 2016. Funds spent on battlefield operations are just a fraction of total war-related expenditures once medical-related costs, homeland security, and interest are included.
According to the institute, these additional expenses bring total war-related spending in Iraq and Afghanistan closer to a mind-boggling $4.8 trillion. That's more than half of the $9 trillion added to the deficit since 2001.
The explosion in deficit spending triggered by these war costs absolutely pounded the U.S. dollar from 2001 to 2012. But it was also a powerful tailwind for gold.
It wasn't until the federal budget sequestration went into effect in 2013, forcing across-the-board reductions in government spending (including the military), that the dollar began to stabilize. Gold, in turn, began to weaken.
Here's the part of the story most investors don't yet appreciate: The budget sequester has been a disaster for our military.
Four years after the sequester began, it's now becoming increasingly clear the sequester has compromised the preparedness of our troops and their equipment. Here are some quotes from U.S. commanders earlier this year:
“The strains on our personnel and equipment are showing in many areas, particularly in aviation, in communications, and intelligence.” – Marine Gen. John M. Paxton, Jr.
“The ripple effect of that goes through the years. You not only lose the maintenance time, but you lose qualification time for people, and that experience set can never be bought back.” – Navy Adm. Michelle Howard

“We made difficult trades between readiness today and the critical investment required to modernize for the future against potential adversaries who continue to close the technological gap.” – Air Force Gen. David L. Goldfein

Two months ago, Bloomberg also published an investigative piece on the topic. It learned our dedicated service men and women are literally dying because of the corners being cut to keep aged equipment in service. Since January 2015, for instance, 24 people have died in six noncombat Marine accidents – a five-year high for such fatalities.
And another important problem is boiling below the surface: The battlefield is quickly leveling as our adversaries around the globe obtain precision-strike capabilities that were once exclusively America's. Parity on the battlefield means future confrontations are likely to last longer… and cost even more.
Escalating military spending and federal budget deficits in the years ahead look like low-risk bets. As it plays out, I fully expect gold and other precious metals to rise, just like they did before the sequester went into effect.
Take this opportunity now to construct a portfolio you'll be comfortable holding for the balance of gold's next uptrend.
Good investing,
Mike Barrett

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.