Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

How to Win an Easy Conviction in Court: Play a Movie for the Jury

Thursday, March 16, 2017 18:50
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

from The Daily Bell:

Court is boring! If you want to get a conviction in the age of short attention spans, you need to entertain the jury!

Why would you rely on facts and truth in the U.S. court of law, when you could just play a Hollywood fabrication?

We all know how stale and dry court cases can be. But offer up some clips of a cool blockbuster hit, and the jury will love you! You won’t have to bother with pesky legal proceedings. You can induce the verdict you want based on emotions.

And now the precedent has been set that this tactic is perfectly legal in U.S. courts.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has just ruled that it is permissible to show a movie in court as evidence if the movie is close enough to the actual crime.

Because suspects in a robbery “emulated” the movie The Town to commit an armed robbery, the judge ruled that playing clips from the movie was fine because of the similarities to the actual crime.

The Government sought to admit the film clips as relevant because, given the similarities between the actions depicted in these scenes and the February 2012 robbery, the clips helped to explain why the 2010 and 2012 robberies had proceeded differently.    The similarities included: (1) pouring bleach on the bank surfaces; (2) threatening an employee by revealing knowledge of the employee’s home address; (3) wearing police badges, uniforms, and sunglasses; and (4) wearing masks.    In connection with its motion, the Government submitted an iPhone photograph that showed Monsalvatge standing next to Byam and wearing a t‐shirt with a silk‐screened image of one of the masked robbers from Clip 3 of The Town.    The Government also included text messages showing that Monsalvatge had designed and custom‐ordered the t‐shirt at a mall. 15    Dunkley and Byam each raised a Federal Rule of Evidence 403 objection in their papers opposing the Government’s motion in limine.    The district court granted the Government’s motion to admit the evidence.

It appears that the robbers were encouraged to change the procedure from the first robbery to the second using inspiration from the movie The Town.

But how exactly does that help prove them guilty of actually committing the crime? Is the fact that a suspect wore a t-shirt depicting The Town proof that he planned a similar robbery to the one depicted in the movie?

Read More @ TheDailyBell.com

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.