Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange: "There's Something Wrong With Hillary Clinton"

by Tim Brown, Freedom Outpost:

After Hillary Clinton tore into Wikileaks and its founder, Julian Assange, saying that they were a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence,” Assange fought back via the social media platform Twitter and responded, “There’s something wrong with Hillary Clinton.”

“There’s something wrong with Hillary Clinton,” Assange tweeted on Sunday.

“It is not just her constant lying,” he added.  “It is not just that she throws off menacing glares and seethes thwarted entitlement.”

“Watch closely,” he continued.  “Something much darker rides along with it. A cold creepiness rarely seen.”

There’s something wrong with Hillary Clinton. It is not just her constant lying. It is not just that she throws off menacing glares and seethes thwarted entitlement. Watch closely. Something much darker rides along with it. A cold creepiness rarely seen. https://t.co/JNw2dkXgdu

— Julian Assange 🔹 (@JulianAssange) October 15, 2017

Yeah, it’s called being a sociopath.

Clinton appeared on an Australian TV program and said Assange was a “nihilistic opportunist who does the bidding of a dictator.”

She also claimed that “WikiLeaks is unfortunately now practically a fully owned subsidiary of Russian intelligence.”

Of course, she did so with zero evidence, but lying in this manner is not uncommon for a Clinton.

However, Assange reminded her that Wikileaks had done pieces on Russia and Clinton happened to be right in the mix.

“WikiLeaks has a pristine record for accuracy,” Assange tweeted.  “HRC is not a credible person. The primary cause of her downfall was her own Machiavellian scheme to elevate Mr. Trump (“Pied Piper”).”

“Our last Russian expose was three weeks ago,” he added and linked to a Wikileaks article.

WikiLeaks has a pristine record for accuracy. HRC is not a credible person. The primary cause of her downfall was her own Machiavellian scheme to elevate Mr. Trump (“Pied Piper”).

Our last Russian expose was three weeks ago. https://t.co/MGa1z99vVU https://t.co/He4vgLIKBW

— Julian Assange 🔹 (@JulianAssange) October 15, 2017

When it comes to credibility, Assange and Wikileaks are light years away from Hillary Clinton.

Indeed, Clinton has a public record of lying, far more than Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah.

Following the Watergate investigation, she was terminated by Jerry Zeifman, chief counsel of the House Judiciary Committee following the Watergate inquiry and added that he “would not — could not recommend her for any further positions.”

While leftist Snopes and The Washington Post say this is not true, the reality is that Zeifman said so in a 2008 interview.

The CATO Institute reports:

Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler gives a maximum Four Pinocchios to the claim that Hillary Clinton was fired during the Watergate inquiry, which has gotten a lot of circulation on social media. He makes a detailed case that there is no evidence for such a firing. However, along the way he does note some unflattering aspects of her tenure there:

In neither of his books does Zeifman say he fired Clinton. But in 2008, a reporter named Dan Calabrese wrote an article that claimed that “when the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation.” The article quoted Zeifman as saying: “She was a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”…

In 1999, nine years before the Calabrese interview, Zeifman told the Scripps-Howard news agency: “If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her.” In a 2008 interview on “The Neal Boortz Show,” Zeifman was asked directly whether he fired her. His answer: “Well, let me put it this way. I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — we no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not recommend her for any further positions.”

So it’s pretty clear that Jerry Zeifman, chief counsel of the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate inquiry, had a low opinion of the young Yale Law graduate Hillary Rodham. But because she reported to the chief counsel of the impeachment inquiry, who was hired separately by the committee and did not report to Zeifman, Zeifman had no authority over her. He simply didn’t hire her for the permanent committee staff after the impeachment inquiry ended.

Kessler also notes that Clinton failed the D.C. bar exam in that period. She never retook the exam (passing the Arkansas exam instead) and concealed her failure even from her closest friends until her autobiography in 2003.

Read More @ FreedomOutpost.com