Statements by David Hogg Should Be Treated As Nothing More Than Statements From A Ignorant Child

by Suzanne Hamner, Freedom Outpost:

Until David Hogg has a grasp on the reality of evil, including the nations that murdered tens of millions of their own people after disarming them, and an understanding of the Constitution and the Bible, he should be treated as a child, nothing more.

Since the Valentine’s Day Parkland, Florida High School shooting, students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, where the shooting occurred, have come out to demand the government enact more gun control laws.  The lamestream enemedia capitalized rapidly on these “willing” students to parade in front of cameras and on television “news” shows to peddle a gun control narrative.  One student, in particular, has become the “face man” and “poster boy” for gun control – David Hogg, a senior at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

Forget the numerous conspiracy theories being postulated about Hogg.  Forget that his father is a former FBI agent who supposedly retired in 2014.  Focus instead on Hogg’s statements made to the media.

Before someone goes off and accuses this writer of “slamming” a survivor of a school shooting who happens to be a teenager, remember this:  when an individual enters the arena of politics to promote any agenda conflicting with the Constitution and infringing on God-given individual unalienable rights, that individual is fair game, regardless of age or circumstance.  Young David Hogg willingly entered the arena;  he’s fair game to challenge.

After President Trump tweeted, “Very sad that the FBI missed all of the many signals sent out by the Florida school shooter. This is not acceptable.  They are spending too much time trying to prove Russian collusion with the Trump campaign – there is no collusion. Get back to the basics and make us all proud!”;  David Hogg issued several statements to CNN.

As The Hill reported:

I think it’s disgusting, personally. My father’s a retired FBI agent and the FBI are some of the hardest working individuals I have ever seen in my life,” student David Hogg said during an interview on CNN.

“It’s wrong that the president is blaming them for this.”

Hogg added that Trump is in charge of the FBI.

“He can’t put that off on them. He is in charge of them and these people, what they love to do is push this off on bureaucracy and say it’s not them,” he said.

“He is in charge of the FBI … the executive branch is supposed to enforce laws and as such, President Trump is in charge of that and the FBI.”

First of all, the FBI has been totally politicized by the Obama administration as was evidenced by James Comey allowing Hillary Clinton a pass on her unsecured email server and mishandling of classified information.  Second, the FBI leadership has engaged in blatant bias by supporting Hillary Clinton and engaging in “fail safe” activities in case Trump won,  as evidenced by the exchange of texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, his mistress, to include Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.  Moreover, the FBI was too busy trying to “prove” the Clinton-Steele Dossier to bother with reports of a potential school shooting.

So, yes, the FBI did not follow the protocols it should have when it received tips about the alleged shooter, Nikolas Cruz, because the agency itself was too busy trying to play politics the upper echelon wanted played.  Yes, the FBI dropped the ball and deserves blame.

It’s not wrong for the President to call the agency out for their negligence and incompetence.  Part of the job of president is to make sure the laws are faithfully executed.  And, while the FBI is under the Department of Justice as its investigation arm and the DOJ is under the executive branch, the FBI is responsible to the Attorney General while Congress, through oversight committees in the House and Senate, oversees the budget, appropriations, programs and special investigations and the Director of National Intelligence oversees the FBI intelligence gathering operations.  So, to say the president is “in charge” of the FBI is a simplistic view.  And, how many agencies are still holding to the Obama era “instructions” despite instructions and policy changes from Trump, including the FBI?

And, exactly what “laws” was the president to enforce to prevent this?  It was the united States Congress, both chambers, that passed the Gun-Free Schools Zone Act of 1990, under President George HW Bush, that was held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court as it violated the Commerce Clause.  But, the Gun Free Schools Act in 1994 made it federal law for schools to adopt a gun free position in exchange for federal funds while encouraging States that received federal funds for education to adopt “zero tolerance” laws.  Also under President William Jefferson Clinton, Attorney General Janet Reno altered the language in a section of the law to claim that the firearm in question moved in or affected interstate commerce, inserted the change into the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 and Congress passed the bill.

Read More @ FreedomOupost.com