GMOs and Crop Yield — Jayson Lusk

Jayson has this (and more to say:

You also can’t just cherry-pick the results you want to emphasize if you want to actually be objective. As Ireported earlier, larger studies conducted over a much wider geographic region DO show yield improvements from biotech adoption (though that study shows – like the more recent one in Nature – that yield effects of traits are not additive). Moreover, check out table 1 (gated) ofthe aforementioned study in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, which shows 31 different results from numerous studies, almost all of which show a yield boost from biotech. Or see this studyin Science by another preeminent agricultural economist showing significant yield gains (and pesticide reductions) from biotech adoption in India. The totality of the evidence suggests that – in most locations and for most crops – biotech does increase yield most of the time (though not always and not in all locations and not for all crops).

That gets to my last issue with Philpott. He (and others) continually reference the work of Charles Benbrook on pesticide use associated with biotech. But, rarely do they differentiate between pesticides use (which biotech DOES reduce) and herbicide use (which biotech has increased). Also ignored is the relative toxicity and environmental effects of pesticides vs. herbicides or the reduction in toxicity that has occurred over time as a result of biotech (see this recent critique of Benbrook’s work). If that weren’t bad enough, such authors also fail to point out that use of herbicide-resistant biotech facilitates no- and low-till farming practices, which are a real environmental benefit (indeed, the data shows that biotech adoption is strongly correlated with no- and low-till adoption).

I’m not saying there are no downsides to biotech use (e.g., more rapid development of herbicide resistant weeds; potential market power in the seed/chemical sector). But, one has to look at the totality of the evidence and not just cherry-pick. Moreover, you have to look at the decisions made by real-life flesh and blood farmers all over the world who have voluntarily adopted GMOs. The fact that biotech was so readily adopted by farmers (and is still so widely in use) aught to tell you something.
Read more @ GMOS and Crop Yield — Jayson Lusk: