Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By GMO Pundit (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

GMO Statistics Part 43. How to Mislead With Statistics: GMO Crops Edition | Mother Jones

Thursday, November 3, 2016 17:02
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

The New York Times recently had a front page story supposedly telling all about the GMO based USA is doing badly with herbicide and synthetic pesticide use in farming as compared to non-GMO France.

A key feature was claims about percentage changes in synthetic pesticide use in farms.
.
US professor A. Kniss' graphs (just republished at Mother Jones) show how The Times' version of those claims looks in a visual format.

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cHM6Ly8zLmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8tUjI4T1Jnc0g5WE0vV0J2RE9kaVZsOUkvQUFBQUFBQURlTlkvZ3B2cXNaUnZUYUkyTU1zRFpiUEQtUmZNb21SSTYzekFBQ0xjQi9zNjQwL2Jsb2dfZ21vX2Nyb3BzX3VzYV9mcmFuY2VfcGVyY2VudGFnZV8xLmpwZw==
How to mislead — judicious use of starting point, country and percentage values

The graphs, at face value put  US Agriculture in a bad position as it seems French usage it getting better while USA is getting worse, in terms of potential environmental impact of synthetic chemicals.

But when the data are plotted on a fair basis by showing of abolute amount used per area of land, something the NYT failed to show, a different story emerges:

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cHM6Ly8zLmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8tNlotVEdhOE45UmsvV0J2RTROelN6TEkvQUFBQUFBQURlTmsvUlhDX0NLLVo2MXdFMzBsd0prcER2b0w1U3NWdUFjZmtBQ0xjQi9zNjQwL2Jsb2dfZ21vX2Nyb3BzX3VzYV9mcmFuY2VfYWJzb2x1dGUuanBn
Fairer ways of making inter-country comparisons — how much stuff per acre?

In this graphical presentation, non-GMO France is only recently catching up with the better performing GMO crop using USA. But that aspect of the numbers didn't match the Times' forced narrative.

(Follow the links back to see other ways NYT got this major story wrong.)

@How to Mislead With Statistics: GMO Crops Edition | Mother Jones:

The original NYT front-pager that started this pesticide usage discussion also got involved in discussions about crop yield improvement. These discussions also missed their target.

It's worth noting that criticisms of GM technology's lack of contribution to yield improvement have been going on for several years. See an earlier GMO Pundit post on crop yield here:

The Pundit thus finds it easy to guess where The Times got the missing yield benefit part of their story line from.



Source: http://gmopundit.blogspot.com/2016/11/gmo-statistics-part-43-how-to-mislead.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.