Why George Osborne must be removed

This blog immediately pointed out the grossness of Osborne’s budget misjudgement,
read here,
when the  details were known. Many years spent analysing the
feasibility of commercialising North Sea oil fields allowed me to
immediately recognise the potential and pointless disaster Osborne had
created. Obtaining an acceptable annual average rate of return on such
huge investments is always stunningly adversely affected by apparently
small changes to tax legislation. All such tax regimes result in
percentage returns based on the realised hydrocarbons sales price, it is
therefore completely disingenuous of Osborne to argue, as he did
yesterday, that changing the tax regime was the only means the
government (not necessarily synonymous with the people of the country)
would gain its share of rising market prices. As I stated in my posting
of last Thursday in the link above:

Furthermore and even more
critically at present, North Sea energy (is) in a declining phase (and)
thus needs extra tax incentives as it provides a protection against the
ever growing middle-east chaos.

Is immaturity sufficient excuse for Britain’s milksop ministers getting everything so clearly wrong, read
this on the RAF pilot shortage for example? 
Is David Cameron as big a moron as his daily actions now increasingly
indicate and can Nick Clegg really be as cretinous as he is allowing
himself to appear?

Whatever the answer, as set out in my posting of yesterday immediately
beneath this, it is clear that with Gordon Brown these two set out to
deliberately bankrupt our country in a vain and hopeless bid to save the
doomed Euro, immediately following the last General Election. It has
since appeared that action might well prove to be be the worst they
could achieve, however, daily growing evidence now throws even that
assumption into doubt!

WHY DID THE THREE MAIN PARTY LEADERS AUTHORISE ALISTAIR DARLING TO SIGN
UP FOR THE EFSF, KNOWING THE PROCEDURE WAS ILLEGAL, THE UK LACKED ANY
GOVERNMENT WITH THE POWER SO TO DO AND THAT IT WOULD MERELY WASTE
BILLIONS TO DELAY THE INEVITABLE?