Banned 9-11 Report from Fox News Implicating Israel Revived (Audios & Videos)

Ok Defa, you twisted my arm. I will respond to your ridiculous assumptions and misconceptions about me, but only very briefly. Your closed mind is not worth much of my time. I’m sure you will be disappointed, as I don’t call you, or anyone, any of the names you mentioned. Name calling is only used to compensate for lack of substance. I understand that, and have no respect for those who use the tactics you describe in your comment.

Listed below is short collection of issues concerning 9/11 that I, and many others, find problematic. If you believe you can successfully ‘debunk’ these concerns using rational, objective and verifiable data, by all means, be my guest. Or as you like to so often say, “good luck”

First of all there is NO proof that Islam or Osama bin Ladin, had anything to do with the attacks. Not only did Osama never claim responsibility for the attack himself, he was never formally charged by the FBI for the crime due to lack of evidence of his involvement. On OBL’s official FBI 10 most wanted fugitive poster, which the page says was last revised in November of 2001, 9/11 is not one of the crimes he’s wanted for, and he’s listed as deceased….In 2001.

On any given day if a commercial jet strays from its course they are contacted immediately by air traffic control. If there is no immediate response, fighter jets are scrambled to escort the plane to land and would be there within minutes. If there is still no response, protocol authorizes the fighter jets to blow the off course commercial jet out of the sky to avoid the type of situation we all saw on 9/11. So if this is standard protocol than how is it that high jacked planes on 9/11 were able to circle about seemingly aimlessly off course for well over an hour with no airforce intervention? Remember Bush saying how they weren’t prepared because nobody could have ever imagined the attacks? Well, as it turns out, on 9/11 the airforce were conducting some 40 different drills, some of which involved high jacked commercial airplanes to be used as weapons. “”The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out.”
- Captain Eric H. May, former U.S. Army military intelligence officer

Watching building 7 crumble at free fall speed into its own footprint, it is obvious that it was a controlled demolition. No? Well if not, can you show me one single example throughout the course of history where another well fortified sky scraper has crumbled in the same manor into its own footprint at free fall speed due to office fires? I have looked high and low but there are none. This of course requires a professional set up team to spend weeks strategically placing explosives. There are many examples of much worse fires occurring and the building remains standing.

Then we have the case of the alleged plane hitting the pentagon. First of all there are hundreds of cameras around the exterior perimeter of the pentagon and somehow not one of the cameras were able to capture the video or image of a plane hitting the pentagon. Surely if a plane did hit the pentagon many of these cameras would have caught it. Yet, when asked to release footage from these cameras for investigation purposes, the pentagon denied the request and deemed the footage as “classified.” There was however four frames released which showed an explosion at the pentagon but nowhere in the footage could a large passenger plane be seen. Why classify the footage? Why not end the debate once and for all and show the world what those hundreds of cameras saw that day? Add this to the fact that the debris showed no evidence of a passenger plane, as one would expect to see at least the remnants of the nearly indestructible titanium engines, as can be seen in 99% of all plane crashes.

Also, add this to the many statements made by professional commercial pilots who have stated that to fly a jet of that size, that low to the ground at more than 500 miles per hour is physically impossible for even the best of pilots, because the jet would literally tear itself apart due to the exerted stress. But some how a couple of amateurs who could barely handle a single engine prop plane in training managed to pull off such an impossible manoeuvre? Not only that, they did it without taking out any light posts in their path heading towards the building as is clearly shown by numerous pictures of the crash site immediately following the incident.

If these seemingly miraculous feats carried out by amateur cave dwellers with box cutters isn’t enough to question the “official” narrative, consider the eyewitness accounts of some 30 pentagon employees whose initial statements were that a MISSILE had hit the pentagon. It must also be coincidence that the “plane” flown by amateur high jackers managed to strike the pentagon precisely where the computer records of the “missing” 2.3 trillion dollars announced by Donald Rumsfeld the day before the attacks were located, essentially destroying all evidence of the missing trillions and any hopes of tracking where the money went. Or so they hoped.

Now here are some problems with the “flight” that supposedly went down in a field in Pennsylvania. Once again at the crash site we would expect to see some clear evidence of a passenger plane crash which is normally littered with debris. Engines, fuselage, bodies etc. Instead what is shown by both Aerial and ground photos immediately following the incident is none of the above. There is almost no debris, no engines, no fuselage, no bodies, nothing except for a smoking hole about 15ft. in diameter, some clothes and some un damaged passports…How does such a large passenger plane leave such a small hole? How is it that nearly indestructible titanium turbine jet engines were magically vaporized on impact, yet articles of clothing and paper documents were found relatively un damaged. If this were truly a plane crash, than it is the only one of its kind ever to occur throughout history and requires quite a stretch of the imagination to believe without question. I wonder what the mathematical probability of even two commercial airline crashes occurring on the same day, where neither of which leave any trace of the titanium engines? These are a few of the common sense questions and problems that I, and many others have.

According to israeli news broadcaster Haaretz:

“Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen, and the company has been cooperating with Israeli and American law enforcement, including the FBI, in trying to find the original sender of the message predicting the attack.

In odigo’s defence Micha Macover, CEO of the company, said the two workers received the messages and immediately after the terror attack informed the company’s management, which immediately contacted the Israeli security services, which brought in the FBI.

“I have no idea why the message was sent to these two workers, who don’t know the sender. It may just have been someone who was joking and turned out they accidentally got it right. And I don’t know if our information was useful in any of the arrests the FBI has made,” said Macover. The bottom line here is that Odigo is a U.S. based israeli owned instant messenger service which “somebody” used to provide warning to fellow Israelis, 2 hours before the attacks occurred on 9/11.

Another instance that I and many other researchers find suspicious is that a company which the israeli government owned 49% of called ZIM, vacated its 10,000 ft.sq office space one week before the attacks. What’s interesting to me is that the lease on their office space was not over until the end of 2001 so ZIM had only about three months left on their lease, yet they took a 50,000 dollar penalty for breaking the lease agreement just to get out of the WTC one week before the attacks. Why were they in such a hurry to get out?

FBI agent Michael Dick was investigating this suspicious move but he was removed from his duties by Zionist supporter and head of the justice department the Ashkenazi Jew Michael chertoff.

Something else that seemed to confirm Israel had prior knowledge of the attacks was the fact that on any given day there would normally be around 45,000 people in the WTC buildings and of these people, hundreds if not thousands of them are Israelis. Yet on September,23,2001 the New York Times published an article which stated “There were, in fact, only three Israelis who had been confirmed as dead: two on the planes and another who had been visiting the towers on business and who was identified and buried. (New York Times, Sept. 22)

So not a single israeli national out of the hundreds or even thousands who normally worked in the WTC was killed in the sept,11 attacks. This evidence may be viewed as circumstantial on its own but when added to the fact that there is documented prior knowledge of the attacks, referring to the warnings sent out on the Odigo instant messenger service two hours before the attack, this alone would be enough reason to suspect involvement in any other crime investigation.

On sept,10,2001 the Washington post ran a story regarding a 68 page study done by the U.S. Army School for Advanced Military Studies (SAMS). The study by the school led by an elite army officer made the following comment concerning the israeli intelligence service, the Mossad.

Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”

Not even a full 24 hours later the WTC is attacked. Are we to just add this to the rest of the incredible “coincidences” involved with this investigation?

On the morning of 9/11 there was a concerned woman who called police to notify them of three men acting very suspicious outside her house. When police arrived they witnessed three men joyfully celebrating the 9/11 attacks while getting the whole thing on video. Obviously the three men were detained immediately and upon questioning, police found out the men were israeli. These men ended up being promptly deported back to israel under the orders of Michael chertoff (give rank) before any further questioning could take place. When back in Israel these three men appeared on a talk show and when asked of their experience one of the men said something like: “They questioned us with allegations of being with the Mossad and I told them we come from a place where terror happens all the time, so we were just there to document the event.”

Right, so unless you knew the attacks were going to happen, how would you know to be there in a prime filming location so you could document them?

Also on 9/11 a van carrying explosives was pulled over by the Washington bridge. Again, the Israelis driving the van were arrested and taken in for questioning. The mother of a friend of mine was in a bus on that bridge on 9/11 when all of this was taking place. The passengers had to be evacuated. Before you know it these criminals are on a plane headed back to israel. Now these men were obviously guilty, they had explosives. This was just swept under the rug as if it were not important. In fact there were as many as 160 Israelis arrested in the weeks leading up to 9/11 and weeks following. Many of these israelis were suspected of being Mossad spies. There was not even a chance for proper investigation because zionist chertoff takes care of his own and sent his israeli pals home to their families. This is a crime in that it is interfering with a criminal investigation.

This is not the first time israel has planned to murder Americans to blame it on Arabs to get america to go to war with Israel’s greatest enemy.
Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed.
Paul Findley, an ex congressman who served 11 years had this to say about the 9/11 attacks “America suffered 9/11 and its aftermath and may soon be at war with Iraq, mainly because U.S. policy in the Middle East is made in Israel, not in Washington.”

israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu told an audience at Bar Ilan university that the September 11, 2001 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel. He went on to explain:

“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq,” Ma’ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events “swung American public opinion in our favor.” (This swine is the only parasite who had the audacity to admit benefitting from 9/11)

It is widely know that only 6 weeks before the 9/11 attacks, Zionist Ashkenazi Jew Larry Silverstein purchased the WTC complex and he personally collected 7 billion from the destruction of the three towers. Later, because 7 billion is not enough for Larry he also tried to sue the airline companies for destroying his buildings.

Who authorized the lease of the WTC complex to Silverstein?
Lewis Eisenberg, Chairman of the New York Port Authority.

…and Frank Lowy, the owner of retail conglomerate Westfield America. In May 2001, Westfield paid $127 million for a 99-year lease on the retail area beneath the WTC. Lowy was once a member of Israel’s Golani Brigade and fought in Israel’s so-called “war of independence,” which saw hundreds of thousands of Palestinians terrorized from their historical lands.

Not only are all three men Jewish, but they are all also prominent members of the Jewish Anti Defamation League (ADL) and the United Jewish Appeal.

The 9/11 commission?

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 2, 2006
9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
“Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon’s initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response.”

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry said “The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened”

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”
9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”
So, apparently in what we are to believe is a free country, it is unacceptable to question “official” government narratives, even if they are lacking any and in this case, all substance of truth which can be backed up by physical evidence. Upon review of this subject, the “official” government narratives are not only are lacking substance, they are lacking in the common sense department. So what, just like every other scandal or conspiracy throughout his-story the government decides to pay a commission to investigate the crime in question and once the commission comes to a decision it’s case closed? Are we to believe that a committee payed for by the government is going to conduct an un-biased investigation into crimes like watergate, JFK assassination and now 9/11? Of course not. The government did not pay a committee to find them guilty of a crime. The government payed the committee to coverup its own involvement in the crime.