The Manchester ‘bomb’ media narrative doesn’t fit with the evidence.

Alternative news take on Manchester.  Nathan Stolpman says nobody died.  Vin Armani who comes from Reality TV says he works from a different approach to Nathan – from the narrative you see coming at you.  It’s not entirely a scripted event, but it is an edited event.  The editor creates the narrative, not the writer, says Vin.  If you have enough raw footage, you can create whatever narrative you want.  He looks at how credible is the narrative.  He says there are some huge inconsistencies in the Manchester ‘attack’.

The media are lazy.  They are looking for easy narratives that can be thrust into a soundbite.  The government creates narratives for the media to run with.  Vin unpicks the narrative.  Lone wolf home made bomb was first narrative.  A man portable bomb – under 120 lbs in weight.  You need military grade materials and an expert bomb maker. Combined with a suicide bomber mentality.  Why would a military top level bomb maker be a suicide bomber/ martyr?   Very unlikely.

There was no martyrdom video.  Suicide bombers always do a video.

22 years old.  a UK citizen.  He clearly was not the bomb maker.  A bomb maker with serious military experience from somewhere from Afghanistan.  Why would they hit an Ariane Grande concert?  And hit just one target.

How did they pick the venue?  Why did they not hit a target with some significance, or target an organisation with some role in warfare?

ID found at the scene – again.  Not credible, as this is the same thing on every occasion in government-carried out false flags.

If military grade explosives, he’d be vaporised.  And his ID.

Killing twenty people needs a huge bomb.

The ISIS claim is highly dubious.  No mention of a martyr.  Or suicide bombing.  They claim multi bomb non-suicide attack.  They lie away from the narrative.

The media picks and chooses from the little pieces to create the narrative they want ignoring the bits of evidence that don’t fit.

More evidence.