The Fight started when he hit me back: Links 1 for March 30, 2024

1. The US DoJ ordered YouTube to release the names, phone numbers and addresses of people who watch certain videos.

The DOJ is ordering Google to release the names and addresses of YouTube viewers who watched specific videos.

“It’s unconstitutional, terrifying, & happening every day. These YouTube warrants are chilling, allowing police to target people simply for the content they consume.” pic.twitter.com/pMHUhotiW9

— TaraBull (@TaraBull808) March 29, 2024

Related and equally important. It’s just as likely that Google/YouTube demanded the DoJ have this list.

2. The following is the first in a series of 4 Italian videos translated and subtitled from Italian. They are rather excellent book marks as to where at least parts of Italy are now in terms of the dominance of Islam. The other three parts are at least equally serious. The write up and details on this one can be seen here.

3. So the US White House proclaimed March 29 to be “Transgender Day of Visibility”. 

I guess if this is the first ever one, you can’t say it wasn’t deliberately set up to insult Christianity and the celebration of Easter. Easter changes every year but, if this is the first one, then its a mighty strange coincidence that its on Easter Sunday.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 31, 2024, as Transgender Day of Visibility.  I call upon all Americans to join us in lifting up the lives and voices of transgender people throughout our Nation and to work toward eliminating violence and discrimination based on gender identity.

After all, this is likely meant to be a provocation, so it doesn’t matter that it won’t line up next year. If they need another provocation they will make one, or move this one to Easter Sunday again next year, or by then its possible they will know the names and addresses of everyone who objected to this one.

(Please see item 1 in this post)

Which got me to thinking…

I remember the early days of modern feminism. The way it worked was, women became ’empowered’ to dress and act as sexually provocatively as they wanted to. For women in a certain age bracket, there is a ton of power in that, and most cultures are based in no small part around how to corral that power so that society can work. After all, you can’t build a house if everyone is busy staring into the sun.

Miniskirts and hot pants and all kinds of ways women could make themselves appear more and more fit and willing for reproduction came into fashion. But at the same time, men became more and more limited in how they could react.

When I was a child, it was understood that if a women who showed reproductive fitness walked past a construction site, she would expect to hear noises of appreciation, from the complimentary to the vulgar. Some women liked the attention, others did not. But it was understood that if you appear a certain way, you would get that reaction near construction sites.

That may be the first time the tactic of creating a predictable reaction, and then demonizing and even criminalizing the reaction was used. At least in this author’s experience.

A variation of it is described by the Nazi, George Soros. He calls it, “Reactivity”. This is when you set things in motion and use the predictable reaction to your advantage, and against the people who probably don’t even know they are the enemy. They just reacted normally to whatever provocation was put in their field of awareness.

Islamic terrorists use another version. A second round of attacks against first responders to the first round of attacks.

Sometimes i hear the Hegelian formula of “Thesis, Counter-thesis, Solution” described as “Problem, Reaction, Solution.” One might say the miniskirt issue is that. Women first are encouraged to behave and dress in a certain way, and men will be punished for reacting in exactly the way they always have throughout history. A construction worker that wolf-whistles at a woman passing by these days would likely get fired no matter what she may do to encourage him.

Now the provocations seem to be more deliberate. Not for any other purpose but to provoke a reaction so the rapidly growing, and rapidly growing-in-omniscience state, can criminalize or otherwise disenfranchise all who resist total submission to what Stephen Coughlin refers to as a “dialectical bomb”. 

We now see this used as a steady series of attacks. Covid, the Vaxx, the election theft, even the climate, which isn’t even the most brutal and obvious lie is. Still most people probably believe Global Warming from man made Co2 is a thing. But the Trans dialectic, now that is pure provocation. Pure, ‘the fight started when he hit me back’ tactics. Force people to admit something they know isn’t true at the most rudimentary level and then attack all who resist the lie. Islam is the religion of peace, even when they are blowing up and stabbing everyone all over the place and anyone who reads an authentic translation of their scripture can see plainly that it is a threat-doctrine of global manifest destiny that hates you and their warriors are guaranteed a place in a lascivious afterlife only if they die trying to kill you. But point these things out at your peril. Certainly if they are outside the allowable objections to the narrative attack.

Watch this video to see how the coral works in terms of allowable response to the narrative attack of CO2 and “climate Change”

This guy has no patience for #Climatards. ??????? https://t.co/2WVV40EJCF

— Anti Kommunistic (Let’s/Go/Brandon) (@antikommunistic) March 30, 2024

This is two men arguing against you. Not with each other. Both are perpetuating the illusion that CO2 is a problem and must be dealt with. This is two communists arguing over who was better, Stalin or Pol Pot. But the blue-pill observer will think its a disagreement. Much like when CBC would have politicians on during Covid and pretend to be opposing the state by demanding to know why measures for covid and mandates were not more severe than they were. Never asking if they were needed at all.

These “Dialectical bombs” are more than lies. These are deliberate provocations meant to make people object so they can be disposed of at worst but at the least made an example of if they have any influence at all. The election steal for example was an amazing operation. The Prosecuting attorney of DC vowed to keep arresting protestors till he had 2000. Not sure how that jibes with a republic. These people committed no crime, and some where never even near the Capitol building. But the US now works on a quota system, not law and order. Canada does as well and if you follow the Couts Four issue its obvious.

But the trans thing. Forcing people not just to say that a man is really a woman if that man says he is, and grant him full access to women’s safe spaces, sports etc. but to punish women who object…

And punish they do. A nurse in Canada had her life ruined just for putting up a billboard that says “I (heart) JK Rowling”.

And Canada’s Bill C-6 which criminalizes a parent for suggesting a young child wait till they are 18 or so before getting drugs and surgery that will sterilize them and make them into monsters, now THAT’s Masters level provocation. And with each one, the state grows and grows in power till every aspect of your humanity is under state control, and all choice becomes illusory.

The reality

Allowable objection to a point

4. Pope Francis denounces ‘anti-vaxxers,’ calls COVID jab refusal an ‘almost suicidal act of denial’

Yes! This is from March 2024!

Pope Francis has once again touted the abortion-tainted COVID vaccines, reissuing his condemnation of those who refused to take the shot.

U.S. citizens: Demand Congress investigate soaring excess death rates

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Francis has issued fresh condemnation of critics of the abortion-tainted COVID-19 injections, saying that opposition to the shots “distressed” him since “being against the antidote is an almost suicidal act of denial.”

Speaking as part of his newly released memoirs, in a series of interviews conducted by journalist Fabio Marchese Ragona, Pope Francis highlighted his thoughts and responses to the COVID-19 era, including the abortion-tainted COVID jabs and his warm welcome of them.

The Pontiff rebuked those who did not receive an injection, or who voiced opposition to them publicly, saying:

Deciding whether to get vaccinated is always an ethical choice, but I know that many people signed up to movements opposed to the administration of the medication. This distressed me because in my view, being against the antidote is an almost suicidal act of denial.

Francis also made a thinly-veiled condemnation of Cardinal Raymond Burke, who voiced strong opposition to the injections and who was also hospitalized with COVID-19 and serious health issues.

“There were even a few anti-vaxxers among the bishops: some came close to death,” stated Francis, echoing a veiled dig he made at the American cardinal in 2021.

5. BC Conservatives Drop Doctor Candidate Whose Licence Was Suspended During Pandemic

The B.C. Conservative Party has cut ties with a Denman Island doctor whose licence was suspended in 2022 for signing mask and vaccine exemptions and making statements contradicting the regulatory college, just hours after announcing his candidacy this week.

The party described Stephen Malthouse on its website and social media accounts as a “seasoned family physician” in a March 27 announcement of his candidacy in the Ladysmith-Oceanside riding. By evening, all posts related to Dr. Malthouse had been deleted.

Party president Aisha Estey later announced on social media Dr. Malthouse was no longer a candidate. […] Dr. Malthouse, a family physician with a practice spanning more than four decades, is known for speaking against COVID-19 mandates in the media and for appearing at rallies opposing public health measures.

His licence was suspended by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C. in March 2022 after being a member of the regulatory body since 1978. The college accused him of signing vaccine and mask exemption forms “that he knew included false statements.”

(I hope he sues that party out of existence)

Thank you all for reading this site.

Justin Trudeau says Canadians DON’T want Canada to be great?

Do you miss Canada before Trudeau?

? … ??? pic.twitter.com/nV44BboouV

— Shunya (@Shunyaa00) March 29, 2024