WHY is the Pope SURRENDERING on the issue of homosexuality?

There is tremendous upheaval regarding the issue of homosexuality in the Catholic church, as the following AP news article reveals:

.

“Pope Francis moves toward crafting new policies for carrying out his mission of mercy – a prospect that has conservative Catholics and some bishops in an uproar.”

.

“The gathering in Rome was only a prelude to a larger meeting next year which will more concretely advise Francis on church practice. Still, the open debate at the event, and the back and forth among bishops over welcoming gays and divorced Catholics who remarry, prompted stunning criticism from some U.S. bishops.”

.

hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_REL_CATHOLIC_BISHOPS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-11-08-12-50-58

WHY IS THIS DEBATE HAPPENING?  Read the exerpt from the following report published Sept 13, 2014:

.

www.scribd.com/doc/239660331/AS-THE-WORLD-POWERS-HEAD-TO-WAR-THEY-IMPLY-THAT-YOUR-FAITH-IS-PART-OF-THEIR-POLICIES-ANYBODY-WHO-DISAGREES-WILL-BE-ASSOCIATED-WITH-REVOLUTION-OR-EX

.

Excerpt:

.

The appearance of the “Islamic State” accelerates the 9/11 policy among “moderate” faiths

.

Today a new threat has been identified by the West and has immerged in the form of ISIS or ISIL otherwise known as the “Islamic State”.  A person could ask; where will the Western narrative of this ultra-violent religion lead?  Obviously it will lead to the 9/11 policy as a useful tool to engage the so called “moderate” voices” of main faiths to help stabilize the world from religious chaos.  I have no doubt that this endeavor will empower the Vatican further as it sanctions a geo-religious war on extremism.

.

Lately, according to the Agence France-Presse22 (AFP) the “Holy See’s” ambassador to the United Nations, Silvano Tomasi “supported US air strikes aimed at halting the advance of Sunni Islamic State (IS) militants, calling for “intervention now, before it is too late.”” He went so far as to say “Military action might be necessary”:

.

“While the Vatican vocally disapproved of the US-led campaign in Iraq in 2003 and the 2013 plan for air strikes on Syria – fearing both might make the situations worse for Christians on the ground – fears of ethnic cleansing by Islamists has forced a policy change.”

.

The Vatican Radio23 recently reported how Catholic Archbishop Silvano Tomasi’s quoted the following excerpt from Pope Francis’ letter to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon of the United Nations:

.

 ”In renewing my urgent appeal to the international community to take action to end the humanitarian tragedy now underway, I encourage all the competent organs of the United Nations, in particular those responsible for security, peace, humanitarian law and assistance to refugees, to continue their efforts in accordance with the Preamble and relevant Articles of the United Nations Charter.”

.

In the same article Silvano Tomasi sanctions the use of force via the UN:

.

“when every other means has been attempted, article 42 of the Charter of the United Nations becomes possible justification for not only imposing sanctions of economic nature on the state or the group or the region that violates the basic human rights of people, but also to use force.  All the force that is necessary to stop this evil and this tragedy.”

.

Of course the “World Council of Churches” and representatives of other main faiths including leaders from Islam and Judaism are taking a similar position.  Suffice to say religious extremists have rightly been exposed and condemned for violence, bloodshed and hypocrisy.  Yet as we will see under the next heading, “moderate” religious voices that support the “global war on terrorism” support a first strike nuclear policy.  Will you absolve and bless them should a nuclear confrontation begin?

.

Clearly the Vatican is working with the Anglo American global war to promote “peace” and a “secure future”.  Further evidence will be provided later to show the Vatican’s full complicity in 9/11 policy.  With this in mind I would like to make an easy prediction.  Because of the Vatican’s close ties with the 9/11 policy, it will soon be pressured to officially accept homosexuality and view homosexual unions as moral.  The official acceptance of homosexual unions by so called “moderate” main faiths will isolate anti-gay Christians and fundamentalists as intolerant, divisive and opposed to religious peace and tolerance.  It will also isolate Russia and Iran for their religious opposition to homosexuality.  Having what appears to be religious backing of the three main faiths, the West will promote the idea that Russia and Iran act as religious fanatics driving the world to war.  Any religions or faiths that resist this policy will be categorized as religious fundamentalists who sympathize with war and terrorism.

.

It is undeniable that the “moderate” element of the three great monotheistic faiths has capitulated and colluded with Western foreign policy.   The so called “moderate faiths” are guilty of shedding blood because they provide the popular support to help drive the 9/11 policy and the militaries of NATO into countries affected by “extremists” and “fundamentalists”.  In the meantime those “moderate faiths”, like the Vatican and the “World Council of Churches” among other faiths, are rewarded with a powerful dominant position in the world over main faiths and armed religious groups fighting for the West.