Profile image
By Now The End Begins
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

The Mary in the King James Bible Bears No Resemblance to the ‘Blessed Mother’ of Roman Catholicism

Saturday, May 13, 2017 12:01
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Catholics are taught to “pray to the Blessed Mother” for leading and guidance in their daily lives, yet incredibly the real-life Mary never advised anyone on anything. When she attempted, one time, to give her opinion, Jesus instantly rebuked her

“Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.” Matthew 1:18 (KJV)

Almost 1,900 years after the birth of the biblical Mary, the Roman Catholic Church declared some startling and amazing things about her. Not the least of which was the blasphemous and heretical notion that she was born sinless.

“The Fathers of the Eastern tradition call the Mother of God “the All-Holy” (Panagia), and celebrate her as “free from any stain of sin, as though fashioned by the Holy Spirit and formed as a new creature”. By the grace of God Mary remained free of every personal sin her whole life long.” Catechism of the Catholic Church

This idea was unknown to any writer in the New Testament which clearly states that “all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” in the book of Romans. Yet the idea of a “sinless Mary” forms the basis of Catholicism. Why else do you think that when Catholics “pray the rosary”, they say 10 “Hail Marys” to every one “Our Father”?

If Mary was, as the Vatican asserts, “fashioned by the Holy Spirit” and then “kept free from all sin”, then the birth of Jesus is not so special after all. Mary kinda beats Jesus to the punch, wouldn’t you say? But then, stealing the glory from Jesus Christ is really what the Roman Catholic “Mary” was invented to do.

Things you were taught about Mary that are not supported in the Bible:

  • Mary was not sinless: After the birth of Jesus, Mary went to the Temple to make an atonement for her personal sin according to the Law of Moses. Sinless people don’t need to make sacrifices, Jesus never made one, He was one. Vatican teaching answers this by saying that Mary just made that unnecessary sacrifice because she “was humble”. Well, if she was sinless and pretended to have sin and make a phony sacrifice, that’s not humility, that’s a lie. And lying is a sin, so you do the math. “And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;) And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.” Luke 2:22-24 (KJV)
  • Mary never consulted on anything ever: Catholics are taught to “pray to the Blessed Mother” for leading and guidance in their daily lives, yet incredibly the real-life Mary never advised anyone on anything. When she attempted, one time, to give her opinion, Jesus instantly rebuked her. “And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come.” John 2:1-4 (KJV)
  • Mary had no voice in the early Church: If Mary was indeed the miracle-working super saint that the Vatican claims she is, like all the apostles actually were, then the time for her to “show her stuff” would have been on the day of Pentecost, right? Think about it, the prophecies of Joel had started to come to pass, the apostles were having dreams, visions, signs, wonders and tongues…but where was Mary? She was with the other women, NOT “above the other women”, and simply one of the saints the Bible records as praying to the Lord. Please note that no one in the Church as it was being formed prayed to her, or even recorded that she even had anything to say. What a shocking contrast to the all-knowing, prayer-answering, floating apparition “Blessed Virgin” of the Catholic Church. “These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren.” Acts 1:14 (KJV)
  • Mary had other children: If you take away the perpetual virginity of Mary, then the bulk of all Catholic doctrine built around her collapses. And this is exactly what the King James Bible does so you won’t be confused about the matter. Not only that, Mark gives you the NAMES of the four half-brothers of Jesus! These are not “cousins” as the Vatican pathetically asserts, these are others brothers from the SAME mother. Mark also said there were sisters, so that makes a minimum of 6 kids born to Mary and Joseph during the time she was a “perpetual virgin” Hmm…“And when the sabbath day was come, he began to teach in the synagogue: and many hearing him were astonished, saying, From whence hath this man these things? and what wisdom is this which is given unto him, that even such mighty works are wrought by his hands? Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, but in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.” Mark 6:2-4 (KJV)
  • Mary’s role as Jesus’ mother ends at the cross: In His final moments on the cross, Jesus makes a very anti-Catholic statement. He tells Mary that she is no longer His mother, as the soon-to-be-risen Saviour is “from everlasting” and needs no mother. Jesus feels so strongly about the transfer that it’s recorded with two of the very rare exclamation points in Scripture. Instead of “promoting” Mary to lead the guide the new Church, He lets us know she has no active role in the Church other than simply being a good role model for other women of like faith. “Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.” John 19:25-27 (KJV)
  • Mary is never called the ‘mother of God’: The Roman Catholic “Hail Mary” prayer is loosely based on the biblical account of the angel Gabriel appearing to her, but with plenty of embellishment thrown in for good measure. She is NEVER called the “mother of God” one time ever, this is a complete invention of the Vatican. In fact, the Bible goes one step further with Gabriel not even referring to her as the “mother of Jesus”, but calls Him the Son of God. “And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.” Luke 1:35 (KJV)
  • Mary is not the woman in Revelation 12: The Vatican teaches that Mary is the woman in Revelation 12 with the “12 stars” around her head, but nothing could be further from the truth. The woman in Revelation 12 is the nation of Israel to whom the Saviour was born, and that “woman” flees” into the red rock city of Selah Petra to escape Antichrist in the time of Jacob’s trouble. “And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.” Revelation 12:1,2 (KJV)

If you are a Roman Catholic reading this now (I did not say ‘Catholic christian’ because there is no such thing) as I was for 30 years, why don’t you use your brain and think for a moment? the Vatican makes these outrageous claims about Mary, but NONE of them are found in the Bible. Where are they found? In the writings of the Catholic Church 1,500 later.



This is why the Roman Catholic Church does not have the Bible as its sole authority, because the Bible is against what they teach as I have shown you above. The King James Bible actively contradicts official Vatican teaching in dozens and dozens of places regarding Mary.

Don’t believe the lies of the Catholic Church:

Did you know that the Catholic Church teaches that the very first apparition of Mary was while she was still alive? Incredible but true, that’s official Vatican teaching.

The real Mary in the Bible was a sweet and sanctified young lady who loved the LORD with all her heart, and accepted the awesome task given her. But she was born in the image of Adam and Eve, as we all were, and acknowledged Jesus as her Saviour. Sinless people have no need of a Saviour, just as well people have no need of a doctor.

“And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.” Luke 1:47 (KJV)

The real Mary in the Bible performed no miracles, there is no record of her advising anyone or anyone seeking her advice. Have you ever wondered about that? None of the astonishing things the Catholic Church attributes to Mary are never once found in the Bible. The real Mary in the Bible would be horrified if she knew what was being taught falsely about her.

“For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;” 1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV)

The real Mary in the Bible was a saved sinner who needed a Saviour just like anyone else who ever lives. Don’t pray to her, don’t ask her advice, worship Jesus instead.

“So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.” Hebrews 9:28 (KJV)

The post The Mary In the King James Bible Bears No Resemblance To The ‘Blessed Mother’ Of Roman Catholicism appeared first on Now The End Begins.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question Razz Sad Evil Exclaim Smile Redface Biggrin Surprised Eek Confused Cool LOL Mad Twisted Rolleyes Wink Idea Arrow Neutral Cry Mr. Green

Total 14 comments
  • LindaJoyAdams

    Mary was the FIRST BORN AGAIN CHRISTIAN as she was ‘ infilled ‘ with the Holy Spirit at the time of conception… THAT IS MY Under standing of the Eastern Tradition… and she is a role model for all of us to accept the gift of the Holy Spirit and be made sinless as is the common Christian tradition.. of ‘born again or be made new with our sins forgiven BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN WE CANNOT BE TEMPTED or fall from grace again. which Paul says is the worse kind of state of being for one born again and deny ourselves that salvation… The goddess religion has never been removed from humanity and my own readings and research is that Constantine promoted an underlying caused for the split of the eastern ad western branches of Christianity into trying to equate Mary the human mother of Christ into the goddess religion of Mystery Babylon that has all the satanic cult horrors that go with it including human sacrifice of the first born etc .. and we still have this among us today…. This is not meant to demean the sincere faith of many Catholics who believe in the basic common tenants of Christianity.. Many are saying the one world religion will end up by the goddess religion and Christ will not be the only ‘head’…
    ‘Born again ‘Christians have become the ‘thorn in the side ‘ of those trying to make us all be forced to be thought zombies and believe the same… which cannot be as all truth has not been revealed yet so how can all think the same… under the evil one of the anti-Christ. Thanks for your article.! Mary was a good woman who accepted Christ and became a role model for all of us.. that is how I see her; does she have a special place in heaven.. of course; but not as a replacement for Christ. of the TRINITY>>. but my faith tradition holds that all believers will be saints and not just the ones we humans remember as special..and is there DIVINE some not known of as identified saints at times? .I believe so by some force outside time and space that helps at times some of our ancestors who are less ‘famous’ may just be ones not given human credit for being led to help.?? mysteries we do not fully understand yet?? that have saved my own life a few times in my life.. and to deny that denies that Christ exists and is the one truly in charge of Creation and one we go to and through for eternal life.. Linda Joy Adams

    • Daughter of the Church

      Linda Joy Adams: Mary is the Immaculate Conception -a Catholic dogma confirmed a few years later at Lourdes. She is the Arch of the Covenant in the flesh who became the unique woman worthy to bear the Son of God, Christ.

      As to the “first born again” it appears that he is St John the Baptist, the Saint of Israel, and the last Prophet.

      Jesus Christ, true God and true man existed as you confirm through your own personal experience. Naturally His mother Mary, the Virgin is to be venerated by us all, since the Son followed His own Commandment the “respect father and mother”.

      Mary does not replace Christ, that absudity is said nowhere in the bible, nor claimed by the Catholic Church. At least She has replaced Lucifer, if not has surpassed the fallen angel

  • eatmorevegetables

    Nobody teaches that she was God, so of course it would make sense that Mary in the Bible describes her mortal state – it is an account of what transpired in the real world… why do you deny her prophecy telling that all generations would call her blessed?

  • Pink Slime

    Those in the know, know the Catholic Church is the very thing Yahusha was warning the world about. It is amazing how they fell the Catholic BS even to this very day.

    Showing me the prophecies must come and many will suffer for it. It will be like a time no other and shall never happen again. The end of all FLESH.

    But the time will be CUT SHORT for the sake of Yahusha’s elect, or the CHOSEN ones. :cool:

  • The Watcher


  • Global Citizen Watch

    It was the old magician’s trick to produce a fake to cover up the real. The popular goddess of wisdom, fertility and war who was known by various names through the ancient world. The Vatican just gave her a new name yet again: Mary. She kept her attributes: the blue robe, the moon (on of her many aspects was the moon goddess), the lily, the shell and so on. The goddess they call Mary is really Innanna, Ishtar, Ashtarte, Diana, Aphrodite or Europa. The real Mary would have been horrified if she had known how her good name would be stolen from her.

    If you want to find her in the Bible, you need to search for her by her old name: Ashtaroth. Women would weep over their sun god who had disappeared into the underworld, but celebrated his reappearance on the 25th of December when his consort and mother (yes, he married his own mother) had gone after him and brought him back to life again. She had her own festival in springtime, still named after her: Eostre or Easter. Her attributes are the egg (the circle of life or eternity), the hare (fertility) and hot cross buns. Read in the Bible how women baked cakes to her then as they are now.

    Today she has taken on one of her old roles again: she is showing herself again as the goddess of war: The Woman in the Window – a hidden message on the new Euro note?

  • Daughter of the Church

    There is no place on the comment section for a methodical rebuke to all the “objections” of this article made against the Blessed Virgin Mary who defined who she is through Luke 1, 46-55 : “My soul doth magnify the Lord +, and my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour…..”

    Many mysteries of the incomprehensible God are into the whole Bible, and which man may claim to understand them all? Sola scriptura, without love and grace is a dangerous presumption. Mary was love and grace: “Love” as the worthy mother of the Son, and as the designated mother of all men: “Grace” as per the angel of God.

    Sola scriptura leads to niggardly conclusions such as “Mary had several kids”: The Hebrew had no word for “cousin”.

    Sola scriptura should also base upon a strong biblical platform, and King James is not. KJV is surely very poetic, almost Shakespeare , but it remains a mutilated version of the Vulgate.

    Lastly: to the “sola scriptura” crowd. If only what you read matters, then try the work of Maria Valtorta. Trough this work, the faithful will know better Our Lord Jesus Christ.

    • Daughter of the Church

      In my comment above, I promote the works of Maria Valtorta. Who is she? She is a mystic of the latter days, when everything is to be told. Everything is told in a chronological manner; with historic, archelogical, biblical revelations, think for this latest that some biblical mysteries unknown to St Jerome are revealed . This mystic, bed-ridden, acted as a “secretary” to narrate the life of Jesus Christ.
      This work holds nothing contrary to the Gospels, but only fills the blanks. Its descriptive style is flawless, and the vicious cabal orchestrated by the Vatican of to-day is proof that it must be taken seriously.

      If one Google on Maria Valtorta’s name, one will find pages after pages of negative critics, which are unjust, and repetitive, proof that few have read the 10 books.
      The full text, and annotations may be found on the following web-site:

  • Daughter of the Church

    “I was a Roman Catholic for 30 years”. The author of this piece must learn that the Roman Catholic Church has become the Synagogue of Satan for over 30 years. Nearly 60 years to be closer, and since October 26, 1958 by sunset (Rome) time to be exact.
    On this day, and at this hour the newly elected Pope had been deposed in a coup d’ etat, in order to be replaced by the first of an uninterrupted series of six anti-Popes. One may find the information on To Day’s Catholic World website.
    The author, as well as the near entire Catholic population had therefore unknowingly been “Catholics” since this day when the Church went into an eclipse, which explains his errors, because of having been without a shepherd for so long.

    The root of the errors of this article lays in the non-recognition of the nature of Jesus Christ’s mission on earth. Our Lord intends to appeal to everyone, including the children and the poor. This is why He came as a child born of a woman in a refuge/stable. This choice of His implied that He had to hide for a 30 years before becoming public. This same choice of His implied also that He had to protect His mother from Satan, as well as from the satans of this world.
    Jesus Christ protected His virgin mother by providing her with a chaste husband. Blessed Joseph, the Just kept his mouth closed.
    Jesus Christ remained tight lips about His mother in the passage quoted in this article when apparently “He ignore her”, while in truth Our Lord was elevating His praises to her.
    After the Ascension Mary stayed on earth for several years with the essential task of oversight of the building of the primitive Church. This is why the Gospels speak very little of her, besides the fact that Mary is humble and the opposite of the proud Lucifer.

    I encourage the author, an abandoned child of the “Catholics” (as I was too) to reconsider.

    Lastly Lucifer, turned Satan after his fall knows the “woman” for a very long time. Satan looked for this “woman” for thousands of years before the coming of Christ. It is at Calvary when Jesus was crucified that Satan finally understood that the “woman” was Mary.
    To-day Satan is attempting to fight the “woman” through the spreading of errors, errors into which the Arian, the Gnostics heretics all the way to the Protestants have fallen. Satan having pirated the Catholic Church, the errors are increased.

  • jdpent01

    jdp…Yes, all fall short of the Glory of God, included Mary because no body is righteous on their own, all have Sin which needs the blood of Christ covering, Jesus took on the Sins of the world which included his mother Mary, she was born of earthly parents, therefore, falling into the same, as all mankind.

    • Daughter of the Church


      No you are in error. Mary was born without sin. She was the exception among all the children of Eve since after the original sin. God, to whom nothing is impossible created Mary without original sin.

      God has confirmed the Immaculate Conception in Lourdes. Okay you probably doubt about “all that Catholic stuff”, so let’s return to the origin! The origin comes from the word of the angel of God Gabriel who said: “Hail full of grace”. In the angelic vocabulary “full of grace” means “perfect”; “without the least speck of impurity”, “without sin”.

  • goastdale

    123’s of true Christianity v popular & damnable heresies
    (simply because you “confess” it does not mean you actually are, the devil has deceived many of his own children to believe they are Christians 2Tim 3:5)

    “WHO” it was (what person) that came “IN THE FLESH”, IS THE DETERMINING FACTOR IN WHAT IT MEANS TO BE “ANT-CHRIST”! Even Islam claims Jesus was the Jewish messiah/Christ who was to come in the flesh) they all deny “WHO” it was (what person) that came (to be the Christ) in the flesh!?!…….To deny the father is to deny the son because they are one and the same person that came in the flesh!

    JOHN 14: 8-20 where Christ specifically identifies himself (his person as the person of both the father and the HS; the only distinction is in “location” and “method of manifestation” …….Note Isaiah 9:6. For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: …: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, … the everlasting Father ….The son, father/Holy Spirit are all the same person, NOT like two different persons working together even as “one flesh” ….The “oneness” between Christ and the father is not comparable to a man & his wife, for only a fool would say “When you have seen me you have seen my wife, how sayest thou then, Shew us your wife?” Notice they asked to see THE FATHER and the response was Jn 14:9 ..“HAVE I BEEN SO LONG time with you, and yet hast THOU NOT KNOW ME, Philip…..Now image some fool trying to claim that statement if you asked to see his wife!?!!? You want to see the FATHER but have I been with you but you don’t know me!?!?!

    Jn 14 continued….…………..17. Even THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH; (Jn 14:6 I AM the way, THE TRUTH,) whom the world cannot receive, .. for HE DEWLLETH WITH YOU, (present tense/standing next to them in the flesh) and SHALL BE IN YOU… (future tense “In them”) 18. I will not leave you comfortless: I WILL COME TO YOU (future tense “In them”) Note: The spirit of Christ is the sprit of God and the holy spirit that is why Christ said “I will come to you” (to comfort them, because Christ is the comforter). The spirit was standing next to them in flesh… ….latter it would come to them to be inside of them (inside of their flesh as the spirit we are given)…..that is why. he would send the spirit…… However, Jesus himself here makes the point that the same person who was the HOLY SPIRIT that would come was standing next to them but lets them know “I will come to you again to be Inside of you”

    The whole point to Gal 3:20.a mediator is NOT A MEDIATOR OF ONE, (HEIS) but GOD IS ONE. (HEIS) again, point blank, identifies the number of persons of God! The “but” points out the contrast between multiple persons in a mediation party v the “one” of God. God is not like a mediation party with multiple different persons. …..”the express image of his person” ( the person of God; singular not plural).Any attempt to lay claim otherwise is willful ignorance and delusional nonsense

    NOTE: don’t be that one in prov 26:12 over my use of the word “fool” here prov 18:13 ( ) “But but, the gospel of John…the Gospel of John …look look…” which is quite ironic since the gospel of John does not leave ANY room for multiple different persons of Jesus and father. However the gospel of John does leave a few verses that facilitate God’s promise in 2 Thess 2:11/ Isaiah 66:4 (take note of “HAND” in verse 2,14..You just can’t make this stuff up…God is surely laughing at these fools; Ps 2:1&4)

    ……Mark 12:28…Which is the first commandment of all? 29. …Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD: 30. And ………..this is the first commandment….. 31. And the second is…..

    TRINITARIANS CONFESS JESUS /THEY ARE NOT POLYTHEIST BUT ARE MONOTHEIST LIKE A LIAR & THIEF WHO “CONFESS” THEY DO NOT LIE OR STEAL The simple fact is that just because you confess or deny that you are in an adulterous relationship and denounce all forms of adultery has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact adulterous! .. …A rose by any other name is still just a rose AND calling it a water lily does not change the definition of what a water Lilly or a rose is either!…No, Trinitarians confess & preach literally …”ANOTHER JESUS” 2 Cor 11:4

    - Like a thief in your house caught stealing your things insisting he was not there stealing “I CONFESS I am NOT stealing”. You just do not “properly understand” what he is doing/saying. Further, since you never had a “proper understanding” of what he is doing/saying you have no business accusing him since you do not even know what you are talking about in the first place. It is with and in your own ignorance that you base your “false accusations” & “ad homonym attacks” against him…… Ridiculous of course it is ……2Thess 2:11; Titus 1:16; 2Tim 3:5;

    - A Favorite tool for pathological liars is to use incongruent definitions or create oxymorons out of synonyms such as “a person” and “a being” so as to claim that your god is THREE DIFFERENT PERSONS but ONLY ONE BEING: Which is (1) no different then trying to claim that “THREE DIFFERENT CARS” is “THE ONE VEHICLE” (2) blatant demonstration of the dishonesty & sorcery these children of hell will employ with “a strait face” (which is in part what it means to be a pathological liar)
    ……but, ah i remember how this game is played… “God is three in one” (or 1in 3 or 3in one et al) should have given you a hint, harking back to Satan in The garden…God said you will die…Satan comes along and states no you will be more WISE……today .God said He is one; but Satan’s children come along and say no three is more WISE and humble in the face of God’s grandeur only “a mystery” that can be understood “in faith”. God uses head and right arm to explain the distinctions between father and son.. However, the Trinitarian heretics say to the effect: “NO, that is just a figure of speech, or that is not what God really means. What God is really saying is that God is three different persons”. Fools, hypocrites and blind guides, God said he was One and by your traditions and vain imaginations have taken the words of God and made them of no effect, refashioning God into your image!

    You can download the complete FREE book from

    #2 SECOND COMING Thou Fool! “I come quickly” so “Hold fast
    till i come”… NOT …“in another 2000 yrs I might be coming soon any time now, so hold fast”!?! …those that deny the second coming of Christ in the war of AD70 are practicing a damnable heresy in denying the lord that bought them ( 2Peter 2:1-2 ;2Tim 4:8/ you cant love an appearing you deny& the context is the 2nd coming not the first)… Mat 7:23..”I NEVER KNEW YOU” …..Mat 10:33. But whosoever shall deny me before men……..sound familiar?…. If I said I am coming to your house in this generation when these things happen but no one knows the day or hour what fool would think I might be coming in 2000 years latter!?!? ..2 Tim 4: 4. And
    they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be TURNED UNTO FABLES.
    2Thess 2: 11. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12. That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.



    #3 There is a sharp contrast between THREE groups :

    (1) “PREDESTINED DAMNED” who were NEVER written in the book of life ………..Rev 17: 8 WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD, …as contrasted …EPH 1: 4. According as he hath CHOSEN US in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD

    (2) “MANY CALLED”= ONLY and ALL SAINTS (those who come to Christ) are written in the book of life … Philippians 4:3… ……Rev 21:27; (Only saints are Called and elect; Rom 1:6-7 et al) This is THE CHRUCH and ONLY these can have their names blotted out of the book of life ….….Heb 12:23 to the general assembly and CHURCH of the firstborn … WHICH ………are WRITTEN in heaven,

    (3) THE FEW CHOSEN: Those saints who were alive in group #2 who are now physically dead. They died “faithful” these are the FEW that were chosen faithful…….Rev 3:5. ……; and I
    will not BLOT OUT HIS NAME OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE, (Ps 69:28) …. These are the FEW that are CHOSEN and now that they have died and are saved then “once saved THEY CAN NEVER BE LOST”

    Predestination….its true..its all true…download here

    • b4

      what a f up gathering of whacked out bible thumpers talking all their bullshit like they know something–their insane rambling of thoughts in their tiny tiny brains after they get seduced by satans bullshit,the bible–god does not read the bible–never has=- never will–god did not write the bible–primitive dudes in cave did while inspired by satan—word of men not god–humans do not know god–they are too petty,hateful,immature,judgemental–just read all the bullshit above for proof–but fear not satans followers–salvation is for all–or hell would already be full-full of christians,bible thumpers cause of their evil judgeMENTAL ways-hi there is your best friend satan doing?

  • CTrent33

    Romans 6:14 “For sin shall not have dominion over you; for you are not under the law, but under grace.” Luke 1: 28 “And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, FULL OF GRACE, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.”

    And note She was full of grace BEFORE Christ was even conceived.

    Luke 1:42-43 “And she cried out with a loud voice, and said: Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. And whence is this to me, that the MOTHER OF MY LORD should come to me?”

    Luke 1:46-49 “And Mary said: MY SOUL DOTH MAGNIFY THE LORD. And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. Because he hath regarded the humility of his handmaid; for BEHOLD FROM HENCEFORTH ALL GENERATIONS SHALL CALL ME BLESSED. Because HE THAT IS MIGHTY, HATH DONE GREAT THINGS TO ME; and holy is his name.”

    Luke 2:34-35 “And Simeon blessed them, and said to Mary his mother: Behold this child is set for the fall, and for the resurrection of many in Israel, and for a sign which shall be contradicted; AND THY OWN SOUL A SWORD SHALL PIERCE, that, out of many hearts, thoughts may be revealed.

    “After the birth of Jesus, Mary went to the Temple to make an atonement for her personal sin according to the Law of Moses.”

    Mary was obeying the law. If She had not, there would have been a big scandal. She at the least would have been shunned and it would have cast a shadow on Jesus’ ministry.

    “Why else do you think that when Catholics “pray the rosary”, they say 10 “Hail Marys” to every one “Our Father”?”

    This fosters the false notion that the Hail Mary does not have anything to do with Jesus at all. “Hail Mary, full of Grace the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women and BLESSED IS THE FRUIT OF THY WOMB, JESUS.” You cannot pay honor to Mary without being taken to Her Son. They are inseparable.

    “If Mary was, as the Vatican asserts, “fashioned by the Holy Spirit” and then “kept free from all sin”, then the birth of Jesus is not so special after all. Mary kinda beats Jesus to the punch, wouldn’t you say? But then, stealing the glory from Jesus Christ is really what the Roman Catholic “Mary” was invented to do.”

    Mary was CREATED as such. So The most High and Holy God would have a worthy Tabernacle for nine months. And for Her to be a worthy new spiritual Eve.

    “When she attempted, one time, to give her opinion, Jesus instantly rebuked her.”

    “Mary had other children:”

    Jesus’ “brothers” and “sisters” were his cousins. Both the Blessed Mother and St. Joseph made vows of virginity. St. Joseph was the visible head of the Holy Family, just as the Pope is the visible head of the Church. In both cases God is the actual Head. The Blessed Mother is the Spouse of the Holy Ghost.

    “Mary’s role as Jesus’ mother ends at the cross:”

    Ah, I give a quote you yourself made: ““These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren.” Acts 1:14 (KJV)” The Acts of the Apostles was AFTER Jesus’ death on the cross, and Holy Scripture states that Mary is (still) the Mother of Jesus. What actually happened at the cross, was that Jesus gave all His followers His Mother as theirs too. Also, since She had no other children, She needed someone to take care of Her as Jesus did.

    “Mary is not the woman in Revelation 12:”

    The dirt of israel did not give the Son of God flesh. Mary did.

    “I did not say ‘Catholic christian’…”

    Catholic Christian is redundant. Protestant Christian is an oxymoron.

    “This is why the Roman Catholic Church does not have the Bible as its sole authority”

    The Catholic Church does not have the Bible as its sole authority because the Bible teaches otherwise:

    2 Thessalonians 2:14 “Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.”

    Sola scriptura, on the other hand, has no Scriptural basis at all.

    Well, it’s late now and I still have to pray the Rosary, so I’ll let what remains be.

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.