Ebola: Pandemic or Ghost of Neocons Past?

by Tom Mysiewicz

Ask yourself: If Ebola really was spread from person to person, instead of controlled spread through vaccination — then WHY would the CDC and the U.S. Government continue to allow flights in and out of these countries with absolutely no regulation, or at all?”

Quote Attributed to Nana Kwame, Accra, Ghana

Foreword

In this article, I will endeavor to at least raise questions for further investigation.    For simplicity I have made extensive use of endnotes.  While mass forced inoculation of potentially dangerous vaccines and the imposition of martial law in the U.S. and NATO are certainly foreseeable long-term outcomes of the current situation, I will leave these for other commentators to speculate on.   Also, while the “pandemic” is claimed by many to be a foil for strategic occupation of resource-rich African territory by the U.S./NATO, my treatment of troop deployments only relates to (a) the reality of the epidemic/pandemic and (b) the possibility that countermeasures have been developed to allow troops to operate in a contaminated environment or that this deployment is really a large-scale clinical trial of such Ebola countermeasures.

There is little doubt in my mind that the filovirus agents causing Ebola are real and that they are (or appear to be) making a sudden and unlikely spread after 94 or so years of relative inactivity.[i]  However, many in Africa do not believe in the reality of Ebola or blame it on vaccination programs and foreign testing labs in their respective countries.[ii]  Dr. Cyril E. Broderick, a Delaware State University (DSU) associate professor has made serious allegations concerning the development of recombinant Ebola-containing strains and their testing on African populations utilizing various labs and NGOs, and alleges experiments by the U.S. DoD.[iii]  Reports have also surfaced in Liberia of water sources being poisoned with toxic substances to simulate Ebola symptoms as well as untested “Ebola vaccines” being administered to people with ill effects.[iv]

Is this pure superstition from “darkest Africa”?  There have been numerous vaccination programs in the affected regions of Africa.  (Some 100-million Africans were immunized against smallpox prior to 1972 when the disease was declared officially eradicated.  Massive campaigns by NGOs and governmental agencies have increased numbers of vaccinated (all types) individuals in the Ebola-affected areas from less than 50% in 1990 to greater than 80% in 2010.[v]  For varying historical reasons[vi] one could easily posit the existence of man-made live vaccinia smallpox vaccines incorporating key Ebola genes, potentially producing false test positives and Ebola-like symptoms, and covertly administered as part of  existing vaccination programs.[vii]

[Please click below to continue reading]

This approach is certainly in the literature using other vectors—such as a vaccine based on the highly contagious virus causing the common cold.  In August, GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) experimental Ebola vaccine was fast-tracked into human studies’.  The GSK vaccine consists of adenovirus, engineered to carry two genes of the Ebola virus.[viii]

GSK expressed much optimism over these tests in a recent corporate press release[ix], highlighting work with Professor Samba Sow of the Center for Vaccine Development in Mali (a joint initiative between the University of Maryland School of Medicine and the Ministry of Health of Mali).  These tests began in Bamako, Mali.  (Malian sources allege that Mali’s first “Ebola” case on 24 October, a small child, had been out of the country previously, apparently to allay public fears over the vaccine trials.  Nevertheless, on October 25th, Mauritania closed its border with Mali)

The most accurate test for Ebola, the PCR or polymerase chain reaction technique, makes millions of copies of single gene fragments.  It is qualitative and cannot give indication of concentration.  This is not only my opinion.  The creator of the Cetus’ PCR technique, Kary Mullis, states:

“Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.  PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers.  Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all…The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”[x], [xi]

The FilmArray automated screener, produced by a company called BioFire, Salt Lake City, UT, a subsidiary of France’s bioMérieux, should improve PCR testing at hospitals with its 1-hour result time.  However, keep in mind that this is a PCR-based test.  A person vaccinated with something like the GSK vaccine, for example, would test POSITIVE with this system.  There would also be a similar number of false positives.  (Also worth noting:  the machine was in place in Texas where Ebola-casualty Duncan was turned away but FDA guidelines prohibited the hospital from using the machine to screen for Ebola.)[xii]

The only sure way to detect Ebola, in fact, is to culture the virus in mammalian cells and then examine the viruses under SEM (scanning electron microscope).  How often is this done?  Rarely.   Most labs do not have the containment facilities, equipment or staff to do this.  So, as laymen, how do we know with certainty that most of the deaths from and recoveries from “Ebola” were, in fact, from that disease?  We don’t.  And neither do most of the experts.

I have serious questions as to whether the Ebola outbreak is indeed a pandemic, about its non-exponential spread[xiii], the curious variance in symptomology (e.g., symptomology is extremely vague—could be almost anything[xiv] only 18% of cases exhibit the hemorrhagic characteristics that supposedly define the disease[xv]), the appalling lack of preparation of healthcare workers and emergency preparation despite tens of billions in U.S. agency expenditures for this purpose since 2002, lax quarantine and security procedures allowing infected and potentially infected individuals entry into the U.S. and contact with a large number of citizens[xvi], and the unrelenting harangue of the mass media creating panic in the population.

Read more here:

http://www.vineyardsaker.co.nz/2014/10/27/ebolapandemic-or-ghost-of-neocons-pastby-tom-mysiewicz/

About the author…

Tom Mysiewicz Graduated Magna cum laude from St. John’s Univ. (1976) on full science scholarship. Founded and edited the award-winning bioscience weekly newsletter BioEngineering News (ISSN 0275-4207–1980-1993). Also created and edited the Bio1000 World Directory of Biotechnology Companies (ISBN 0-936451-08-4). Created and edited DJM Enzyme Report, a monthly newsletter on enzyme science and technology, and World BioLicensing & Patent Report, a monthly covering patents and licenses in the bioscience field. After an 8-year hiatus, the events of 9-11 motivated him to cover the increasingly dangerous trend toward aggressive war and neoconservative dictatorship in the U.S. He predicted (in print) the exact start of the Iraq war months in advance and has made numerous correct predictions on unfolding events in the Mid East.