Mandatory Vaccination – What You Need To Consider

By Andy Whiteley

Co-Founder of Wake Up World

In June this year Bill SB277 was controversially signed into Californian State law, which legislates that all school-age children California are subjected to mandatory vaccinations according to the State’s vaccine schedule. Its passing into law was seen as a major loss in the fight for freedom of choice and parental rights by both human rights groups and the anti-vaccination lobby.

Going a step further, legislators in Australia have recently passed laws that require both children and adults to be vaccinated in order to receive family tax benefits and pension payments. The newly passed “No Jab, No Pay” laws (see: Social Services Legislation Amendment) will commence as of January 2016 — at the same time that mandatory vaccination laws also in California take effect.

The Social Services Legislation Amendment was originally proposed to cease financial benefits to parents of children up to and including age 7 of who weren’t complying with theimmunization schedule set out andmonitored by the Australian Government. Now however, the Government has quietly added retired pensioners to that requirement, and altered the age definition of children from “under 7 and born on or after 1 January 1996” to “under 20” — with barely a peep from the mainstream media. This amendment is the first step in making vaccines compulsory for all Australian adults.

Under Australian law you are legally classified as an adult as of age 18. Therefore, the Australian Government has quietly mandated that adults under 20 (as well as aged pensioners) who receive family tax benefits and who are not vaccinated according to the schedule will cease to receive benefits, modifying the terms of mandatory vaccination without public scrutiny. Accordingly, the Childhood Immunization Register will be renamed the Australian Immunisation Register, and will record childhood and adult adherence to the government vaccination schedule — a schedule that may also be modified, with any number or type of vaccines added to the schedule at any time.

Regardless of your belief in the value of vaccinations, the principle behind this kind of policy making should raise serious alarm bells. While voluntary vaccine uptake is declining, how can policies of mandatory enforcement be justified, removing our legal right to choose our own medical treatment and the treatment of our families? And where does it end? If government can presume to hold rights over our very bodies, and we accept it – either actively or passively – what recourse will we have when government uses the same rationale to enforce a policy with which we do not agree — for example, mandatory RFID chips?

CONTINUE READING:

Previous articles by Andy Whiteley:

• Cancer, Coverups and Contamination: The Real Cost of Nuclear Energy
• If We Are Free Sovereign Beings, Why Do We Ask For Permission?
• Geoengineering and the Nuclear Connection
• Digital Deception – Can You Trust What You See?
• Is Matriotism The Future of The Divine Feminine?
• Com-piracy: Proof Human History was Written by Government, Not Science
• Individuality and Spirituality in the Age of Institutional Rule
• Conservation or Corruption? Preserving the Sacred Land at Bambara
• The False Politics and Faulty Science of Climate Change
• GE Spokesperson Speaks to Wake Up World About Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster
• The River – Navigating Your Own Spiritual Route

• Follow Wake Up World On…

  [FACEBOOK]: http://www.facebook.com/joinwakeupworld (An interactive community of over 2,800,000)

  [PINTEREST]: http://pinterest.com/wakeupword/

  [TWITTER]:  http://twitter.com/joinwakeupworld

  [YOUTUBE]: http://www.youtube.com/joinwakeupworld          

  [GOOGLE PLUS]: https://plus.google.com/112452105795129310867/posts

  [WEBSITE]: http://wakeup-world.com