Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Natural Society
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

EPA Approves Dangerous Monsanto-Made Weedkiller

Wednesday, November 16, 2016 9:48
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Natural Society

On November 9, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved dicamba, a dangerously toxic herbicide designed by Monsanto for its next generation biotech soy and cotton varieties. [1]


Source: National Pesticide Information Center

The approval means that farmers will be able to use the new Xtendimax with Vapor Grip Technology formulation of dicamba to help control weeds in their crops that have become resistant to glyphosate and PPO (protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors). [2]

Chemicals on top of chemicals, on top of chemicals.

Environmental groups are extremely unhappy, as well they should be. Let’s take a look at why dicamba has lovers of the earth deeply concerned.

Dicamba

Registered with the EPA in 1967, dicamba contains 2,4-D, MCPP, and MCPA, all toxic chemicals that were marketed to kill specific, targeted weeds and nuisance pests on farm fields in the U.S.

According to a 2015 Penn State University (PSU) study, dicamba herbicides drift to adjacent farms and fields, where they cause “significant delays in flowering, as well as reduced flowering, of those plants, and results in decreased visitation by honey bees.”

The researchers found that both of the plant species they studied were susceptible to very low concentrations of dicamba. The team said:

“By extension, we expect that other broadleaf plant species are similarly susceptible to this sort of damage from drift-level doses.”

Dicamba is also known to significantly damage soy bean crops.

Furthermore, the herbicide was found by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to be the “most mobile” of 40 herbicides it evaluated, which indicates it could contaminate groundwater. [3]

It’s the potential for increased pesticide use that has environmental groups especially concerned, because it could harm both plant and animal species, including the whooping crane, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.

Nathan Donley, a scientist with the group, said:

“Once again, the EPA is allowing for staggering increases in pesticide use that will undoubtedly harm our nation’s most imperiled plants and animals.

Iconic species like endangered whooping cranes are known to visit soybean fields, and now they’d be exposed to this toxic herbicide at levels they’ve never seen before.” [1]

Donley added:

“Piling on more pesticides will just result in superweeds resistant to more pesticides.” [4]

Thus far, the EPA has not complied with its obligation to consider impacts to threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. [1]

soy-beans-crops-735-350

Making Headlines

Dicamba was in the news over the summer because its illegal use caused extensive crop damage in the Midwest due to drift.

As I wrote in August, Monsanto didn’t care that its product, then simply called “Xtend,” was still awaiting regulatory approval, and the agritech giant began selling its dicamba-resistant soybeans anyway. The Xtend version was not designed not to drift, so it wound up seriously damaging neighboring farm fields.

To try and combat these problems, the EPA approved the use of the new Xtendimax product with the following restrictions:

  • No application from aircraft
  • No application when wind speed is over 15 mph
  • Application only with approved nozzles at specific pressures
  • Buffer zones must be created to protect sensitive areas when the wind is blowing toward them [2]

The Xtendimax for use on dicamba-tolerant soybean and cotton has been registered for sale and use in 34 states, including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

Sources:

[1] Center for Biological Diversity

[2] Delta Farm Press

[3] Beyond Pesticides

[4] Reuters

National Pesticide Information Center


Storable Food

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.