Kudos to Vaccine Revolutionaries for Doing Their Public Duty and Sacrificing Their Jobs to Protect Everyone’s Lives

The first fact deserving exposure is that NBC holds the same commercial interests as the NBC in MSNBC. The “MS” stands for Microsoft owned by Bill Gates of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation–the world’s leading vaccine distributor. Bill Gates is the world’s leading vaccine propagandist. Lecturing at this TED Conference, for instance, Gates clearly states he “loves” vaccines because they will reduce the world’s population by 15%, that is approximately one-billion fifty-million (1,050,000,000) people. There is no legitimate scientific rationale to justify how or why vaccines claimed to boost immunity, secure health, and increase longevity, would kill that many people. But that’s what Gates tells his audience (i.e., the “sheeple”) he loves.

Watch Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Sherri Kane bash Bill Gates and other Big Pharma industrialists on RevolutionTelevision.net.

Think about this. Why would Gates, who sells computers, and invests heavily in Big Pharma, Big Biotech, and Big Banking, want to have more than a billion less consumers to buy his products and shares of stock? What’s the incentive?

“About [69] employees of Essentia Health, an upper-Midwest hospital chain, didn’t go to work Wednesday.

“But it wasn’t an early start to the Thanksgiving holiday for them. They were fired for refusing to get flu shots,” Pharmawhore Fox’s article begins. “It’s part of a growing trend for hospitals to require flu shots for workers. Public health experts say it shouldn’t be surprising.”

This observer/whistleblower is a Harvard-trained public health expert who is not surprised at all, for the aforementioned reason. Depopulation via vaccination is a most profitable and efficient protection racket for the oligarchs in Gates’s camp.

Flulapalooza tent, an attempt at Guinness Book of World Records.Susan Urmy / Vanderbilt

“It’s a patient safety issue,” said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease expert at Vanderbilt University and a spokesman for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. “It’s so that we do not give flu to our patients.”

Hogwash! Where’s the scientific proof of this? Where is the study that shows: (1) Vaccine X prevented X number of injected healthcare workers from getting the flu, AND (2) the X number who got vaccinated but developed the flu anyway infected X number of patients; AND (3) X number of non-vaccinated healthcare workers in the same setting: (a) got X-strain of flu and (b) transmitted that same strain to X-number of patients. WHERE IS THAT STUDY, THAT IS REQUIRED TO MAKE THE CLAIMS BEING MADE?

NONEXISTENT!

Proof of the Fraud

In fact, here is prima facie proof of this healthcare and consumer fraud. The following graphic is compiled directly from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publication captioned “Influenza  Vaccination of Health-Care Personnel” reviews the so-called “science.” This is the “definitive” report from the “government” providing an extensive medical literature review on the subject. (Talk about “pseudoscience,” here is a classic example.) Notice the tiny paragraph shown in the graphic. That is the sum total of “scientific evidence” provided by the “government,” and the most “esteemed” panel of special-interest-influenced (i.e., bribed and biased) “experts,” used to justify the claim that vaccinating healthcare workers is a safe and effective method of preventing “nosocomial transmissions” of the flu (that is flu transmitted in healthcare settings).

Here is the link to verify these facts. You can notice that citations 14-17 are very limited scientific studies. Reference 18 is a literature review like the CDC’s publication. There is NOT ONE DEFINITIVE SCIENTIFIC STUDY backing the express claim.

The “closest” study a reasonable person might consider is the #14 Lancet citation. That study found: “virological surveillance showed no associated decrease in non-fatal influenza infection in patients” under care at “under-vaccinated” hospitals. The greater problem with this study is that two different sets of hospitals were used, one that regularly recommended flu vaccines for workers, and the other group that didn’t. Thus, there were many neglected or concealed “confounding factors” discrediting the marginal statistical significance of the study that found 13.6% of dead patients were in the “vaccine hospitals” compared with 22.4% of dead patients in the limited-vaccine hospitals.

OBJECTION: What about the food those terminally ill elderly patients were fed in the under-vaccinated hospitals? Was food service significantly different? Were those elders being poisoned with anything? Not reported. What about the water consumed? Were water samples compared for immune-suppressive toxins?  No. How about lead or arsenic in the drinking water. Not uncommon, but here not assessed. What about the quality of care provided? Were patients treated more lovingly in the higher mortality setting? Elder abuse in terminal care facilities is common. Again, not reported.

“Hospital workers can pass the flu virus to some of the most vulnerable people — frail elderly, babies in incubators, patients with immune systems ravaged by cancer treatment,” NBC’s article continues. That statement is true.

“Vaccinating employees protects patients and the employees’ co-workers.” That statement is false. As the aforementioned pseudoscience proves, the conclusory claim of “protection” from vaccination can not be justified by real science. The claim neglects the facts evidencing fraud.

This fraud is true for all vaccines. To date, there are no definitive scientific studies that prove officials are not killing and maiming more people than they are helping or saving. Proof to the contrary requires long term “risk/benefit studies.” Vaccines are only studied for relatively short periods of time. Chronic conditions caused by vaccines, like cancers caused by common vaccine contaminants such as the Epstein-Barr virus, are never appraised.

Summarily, the “science” offered is standard propaganda for public persuasion.

It is my lay opinion that Essentia Health and its officials are each liable for firing each of the American heroes. I believe a good lawyer has, in the aforementioned facts and laws, a good case to pursue, and a public duty to pursue it.

Kudos to the resisters! If it would help, I will hire each professional fired to help advance Healthy World Organization, and monetize their careers in healthcare by encouraging them to distribute natural vaccine alternatives, such as OxySilver, that too has been precluded from helping people–being suppressed by Big Pharma in favor of the now proven genocide.

Together we can “stop the genocide.”