Canada's Immigration Nightmare Beginning To Bear Cultural Pain

By Frosty Wooldridge

When you import millions of people from third world countries, their sheer numbers overwhelm the host country.  Take a look at Holland and Belgium whereby both countries are being outnumbered by their immigrants.  What’s on the line: Holland’s culture, language and way of life drops into the toilet faster than a European bullet train.

Belgium faces Islamic dominance by its immigrants that expect to change it into a Muslim state. That will happen by the mid century.

Canada, once a positive European country, now faces fracturing on multiple levels as it imports millions from Africa, India, Indonesia and the Middle East.

Tim Murray, a Canadian writer and activist attempting to bring sense into the immigration debate, talked about Canada’s perilous future.

CAIR argues that “At the same time Canadian taxpayers should not be expected to subsidize speech which aims to denigrate and undermine Canadian values and threaten social cohesion.”

“Is that not what Canadian taxpayers do when their tax money is conscripted to finance CBC Pravda?” said Murray.  “An institution that aims to denigrate and undermine Canadian values and threaten social cohesion by its promotion of Official Multiculturalism and so-called “cultural diversity”—which ironically acts a shield for a growing Islamic monoculture? Is that not what Canadian taxpayers do when union bureaucrats use tax-deductible union dues to finance pro-Palestinian activism and propaganda, or support the separatist Parti Quebecois? Is that not also what Canadian taxpayers do when mass-immigration-friendly environmental groups make fraudulent use of charitable tax law to aid the NDP, the Greens and the Liberals by attacking the Harper government?

“Canadian taxpayers know all about having to subsidize other peoples’ ideologies. The ideologies founded on a hatred for Western civilization and the European values which have shaped our country. Ideologies which can be seen as a subset of cultural relativism, or as we now call it, Cultural Marxism.

“We are at war. And make no mistake about it, our enemies do not want to debate with us—-they want to SILENCE us. Criminalizing speech in the name of “tolerance” and “cohesion” is an Orwellian feat of such oxymoronic proportions that it would be the subject of hilarity were it not so dangerous.

“The truth is, home-grown Canadian Cultural Marxism —fed by our tax dollars—was raised in an intellectual hot-house. The One-Party Classroom. It cannot survive a debate or a level playing field. That is why they must gag us. We are the generation that escaped the gauntlet of college and high school indoctrination. We have a memory of Canada as it once was—before the social engineers commandeered it.

“We know that the “history” they teach now is garbage. We know that our European heritage, and those who brought it to our land, and cultivated it with the same industry that they cultivated our soil, is a source of pride, not shame. We are tired of apologies made in our name. We will continue the fight to restore free speech to this country and take Canada back. To do less would be to betray the generations that came before us, especially the generation that went to Normandy to fight a totalitarian ideology modeled in many respects on Islam—which literally means “submission”.

“That is why Hitler admired this “religion”. He knew what Mohammed knew. To achieve his goal, he must first practice to deceive. His principal weapon was our need—the need of people of good faith in the Western democracies—to believe in his good intentions and promises. He exploited our willingness to deceive ourselves—anything to avoid war. It was our fatal mistake then, and it is our fatal mistake now in the face of Islamification.

“Fatal—unless we fight back.”

##

http://www.populationinstituteofcanada.ca/

You may reach Tim Murray: http://sinkinglifeboat.blogspot.com or http://biodiversityfirst.googlepages.com, said, “I came upon an orchestration, the environmental movement, and all the musicians were playing violins to the tune of “Overconsumption, overconsumption, overconsumption.” They refused to play any other tune or use any other instrument to compliment that narrow repertoire. Apparently some corporate donors were paying them to be a one-trick pony. www.candobetter.org