"Refugee" Trojan Horse: The Dead Girl and the Sick Country

As reported here a couple of days ago, the man responsible for the murder of Maria L. in Freiburg has been apprehended. He turned out to be a 17-year-old Afghan (but are any of these Afghans in Europe really 17 years old?).
Maria and her parents were both active in the “welcome refugees” movement. The following essay examines her murder in the context of the “welcoming culture”.
Many thanks to K. from Germany for translating this article from Politically Incorrect:

The Dead Girl and the Sick Country
by Wolfgang Hübner, Frankfurt
There are crimes which not only tell us something about the criminal and the victim, but also about the state of society and the country in which they happen. The humiliation, rape and murder of the 19-year-old medical student Maria in Freiburg is such a crime without doubt. The equally suspicious as disgusting appeasements and relativizations of those responsible for the “welcome culture” and their media prostitutes are not going to change this at all. Quite the opposite: this choir of the warners of blanket judgements and popular enragement only confirms that those in charge of letting the alleged murderer cross the state border in 2015 know full well about their complicity in this horrible deed, which was not the first one of a “Merkel refugee” and, unfortunately, won’t be the last.
The dead girl came from a family of the Federal Republic’s societal elite, which takes pains to be cosmopolitan, tolerant, and friendly towards strangers at almost any, yes even at any cost. This is the spirit in which Maria certainly was brought up in, and which inspired this elite daughter to engage in volunteer work for “Merkel refugees”, doubtless in a sincere and idealistic manner. There is no reason — moreover, it is outright disgusting — to heap scorn and sarcasm on the murder victim for this posthumously. Because Maria only did what the doubly and triply protected chancellor has advised the German people to do, namely to seek direct contact with the foreign-cultured “refugees”. And one can well suppose that the dead girl’s parents also had nothing at all against her activities there.
Maria’s father is a high EU functionary and active Christian in the official Catholic Church. He is, as evidenced by a documented text, an active supporter of this “welcoming culture”, which has now cost his daughter her blossoming young life. This, too, for sake of piety and compassion, is no grounds for scorn and ridicule. However, it makes for a compelling reason to ask the question: why did Maria’s parents choose not to express any sign of anger or despair at all about this heinously brutal, violent death of their child in the obituary for her? Maria did not fall victim to a fateful illness or a tragic accident, but to a sex-hungry murderer, who, after the satisfaction of his lust, “disposed” of her in a river. 
This deed must not, even by the commandment of Christian charity, be denied the rage of the bereaved, the call for punishment. At the time the obituary was published, the parents and sisters of Maria could not know yet who would be apprehended as alleged perpetrator. But they could not exclude at all the possibility that the delinquent was a “Merkel refugee”. It takes some outright irrational defiance as well as ideologically motivated ignorance to call for donations to a local “refugee” charity right in the obituary while still under uncertainty what the search for the murderer would turn up.