Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Cafe Hayek (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

An Unfolding Mystery

Friday, February 24, 2017 5:52
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

(Don Boudreaux)

Tweet

Here’s a letter to the Wall Street Journal:

Peter Navarro, Director of the new National Trade Council, calls your report on the administration’s proposal to change the practice of accounting for goods transshipped through the U.S. “misleading” (Letters, Feb. 24).  Yet Mr. Navarro mysteriously never explains just why your report is misleading.  Instead, he only hints that the proposed change differs from your report and what we’ve all so far been led to expect.

Initial reports were that the White House wants to stop counting goods transshipped through the U.S. as exports but to continue to count them as imports.  For example, in your report that sparked Mr. Navarro’s letter, you wrote that “The Trump team wants to exclude the value of re-exports from the U.S. export total because these goods aren’t manufactured in the U.S., while keeping them on the import side of the equation.”  Yet Mr. Navarro’s letter now implies – but only implies – that the White House wants also to stop counting transshipped goods as imports.

Counting transshipped goods as being neither exports nor imports would indeed be a far less egregious accounting change than would continuing to count these goods as imports but no longer as exports.  And so if indeed the administration’s proposal includes also a provision to stop counting such goods as imports, why, in his letter, did Mr. Navarro not explicitly say so?  It would have been easy, and should have been obvious, for him to announce explicitly that the proposal is to also stop counting transshipped goods as imports.  The fact that Mr. Navarro could easily have explicitly corrected your alleged error but failed to do so gives the plausible impression that your report is, in fact, accurate – and that, as a result of now being exposed and roundly and rightly ridiculed, the administration is now trying to back-peddle into a less egregious position or, worse, to mislead the public about what it proposes to do.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Professor of Economics
and
Martha and Nelson Getchell Chair for the Study of Free Market Capitalism at the Mercatus Center
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA  22030



Source: http://cafehayek.com/2017/02/42290.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.