Profile image
By Cato Institute-Recent Op-Eds
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Conservatives Should Reject Trump's Sanctuary City Policy

Tuesday, February 21, 2017 8:36
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Matthew Feeney

Sanctuary cities are back in the news, thanks to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The raids come only weeks after President Trump signed an executive order requiring that federal funds be withheld from sanctuary cities.

This order is a betrayal of the federalism that conservatives claim to support.

Even if the sanctuary provisions of the order did not raise serious constitutional concerns, they would be unwise policy. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports limiting immigration, there are about 300 jurisdictions that deserve the sanctuary label, which describes areas where local officials have decided not to assist the federal government in enforcing immigration law.

Sanctuary policies and practices include barring police from asking crime victims or witnesses about immigration status, as well as forbidding officers from stopping someone solely to determine their status.

Opposing Trump’s sanctuary policies should be easy for Republicans.

Although some might like to portray sanctuary cities as lawless holdouts run by politicians who consider political correctness their North Star, the fact is sanctuary policies can help improve police-community relationships.

Shortly after the November presidential election, Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck said the LAPD would continue its policy of not stopping people to confirm immigration status. San FranciscoCity Attorney Dennis Herrera, who is leading that city’s lawsuit against Trump’s executive order, wrote, “Using city and county resources for federal immigration enforcement breeds distrust of local government and officials.”

Such sentiments are not unique to the West Coast. University of San Francisco law Professor Bill Hing identified sanctuary policies across the country. According to Hing, sanctuary policies “are adopted as measures of good policing.” Police departments have found that sanctuary policies can improve trust in police.

Such trust is crucial to policing. A 2013 PolicyLink survey found that 44 percent of Latinos were less likely to contact police if they’d been the victim of a crime because they fear police inquiring after their immigration status or the status of people they know. This attitude also affects Latino Americans, with 28 percent of U.S.-born Latinos expressing the same sentiment. It’s not hard to see why officers in some communities prefer sanctuary policies to being perceived as deputized federal agents.

The mayor of Austin, Texas, which is about 35 percent Latino or Hispanic, criticized the recent raids, saying, “(We) have a community that is, quite frankly, scared. There’s a lot of uncertainty here. It’s, unfortunately, undermining a lot of the trust relationship that had been built up with our public safety officials.”

In some communities officials have determined that sanctuary policies are better for their community than using local police to enforce federal immigration laws. If enough constituents in these jurisdictions oppose sanctuary policies, then they can make these opinions known at elections. It’s notable that in some cities, sanctuary policies have been in place for decades. San Francisco became a sanctuary city in 1989.

Opposing Trump’s sanctuary policies should be easy for Republicans. The 2016 Republican Party platform praises federalism and bemoans the Obama administration’s encroachments on state sovereignty in a range of areas, including immigration.

Many conservatives claim to revere federalism on many issues, including education, transportation and health care. They correctly argue that decisions about these areas are best made locally, not in Washington, D.C. Those supporting Trump’s executive order ought to consider that local officials know more than White House staffers about what policing strategies are best for their constituents.

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • tiredofBS

    The constituents you are referring to are illegal, so what you are saying here is, it’s ok to break the law?
    It’s not just immigrants ….it’s everyone, anytime you call police for help, guess what they do…they run everyone around for warrants ….. Weather they are victim or perpetrator…. As a standard….so why should it be different for immigrants….?

    Have you even looked at other countries imagination policies?? Say for instance Mexico ? How about Canada ?

    Guess what happens… go to jail and then promptly exiled…. I keep hearing about constitutionality ….. Am I incorrect here?

    You do have to be a citizen to have it applied….anything else comes from nato as to treatment of captives.

    Maybe I would not have such a problem, and many other people’s if the persons sneaking into my country were not trying to change the American way of life….at least the perceived way of life….. When I can not say merry Christmas because someone may be offended by it…..guess what, they came here, they should be the tolerant people’s , not the other way around, if we went to their countries….they would expect us to act and or be a certain way as to conform to their beliefs….why is it different?
    Until these obvious objections are addressed…I will always feel this way, fare is fare, right is right

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global


Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.