Profile image
By Cafe Hayek (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The Real Original Purpose of Civil Asset Forfeiture

Saturday, March 11, 2017 8:09
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Headline: Bitcoin & Blockchain Searches Exceed Trump! Blockchain Stocks Are Next!

(Don Boudreaux)

Tweet

Here’s a letter to the Wall Street Journal:

Dave Erchull is correct that the current use of civil asset forfeiture is abhorrent (Letters, March 11).  The abusive misuse of this practice, however, is even worse than he realizes.

Contrary to Mr. Erchull’s claim that “the original intent of civil asset forfeiture was to combat organized crime and drug trafficking,” the original intent of civil forfeiture in fact was to punish only wrongdoers who are personally outside of the jurisdiction of the country’s courts.  Civil asset forfeiture was originally used only if and when persons suspected of criminal activities could not be arrested and brought to trial to face prosecution.  Unable to convict far-away suspected criminals, civil forfeiture created the legal fiction that these suspected wrongdoers’ inanimate properties are the wrongdoers.  With the inanimate properties (and only these properties) being within a domestic court’s jurisdiction, these properties were then ‘charged’ at civil trial with wrongdoing.  And when found liable for wrongdoing, the properties were seized.  In this way, government punished distant criminals by at least stripping them lawfully of these properties.

Yet today civil asset forfeiture is used to seize the properties of persons who are clearly within the jurisdiction of domestic courts.  The legal fiction that the wrongdoers are inanimate properties is today used simply to save law-enforcement officials the trouble of having to win criminal convictions against suspected flesh-and-blood wrongdoers before taking their properties.  This convenience, in turn, encourages law-enforcement agencies to regard far too many innocent property-owners as suspected wrongdoers.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Professor of Economics
and
Martha and Nelson Getchell Chair for the Study of Free Market Capitalism at the Mercatus Center
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA  22030

See again my and Adam Pritchard’s 21-year-old Washington Times op-ed.



Source: http://cafehayek.com/2017/03/42400.html

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories
 

Featured

 

Top Global

 

Top Alternative

 

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.