arsehole technica

This struggle for bodily autonomy is becoming tiresome. But maybe that’s the point: articles filled with scientific misinformation bring out dissenters, who are then — as I was — removed from social media platforms for the crime of correcting that misinformation. Eventually, the goal of the censors seems to be, all posted information will conform with a “consensus” that stands in for science without having to struggle with the rigors of actually having to prove its doctrinaire assertions, or defend its obvious deficiencies.

On Twitter, I was banned for responding the head of Brown’s School of Medicine who evidently isn’t aware that the fully vaccinated — per the CDC — can acquire and transmit COVID-19, and that their high viral loads may lead to spike expression, either through the skin or, if Pfizer is to be believed, potentially even through inhalation.

Today’s prominent propaganda piece is brought to you by Beth Mole, writing in Ars Technica. Mole is a UNC-Chapel Hill PhD, making her a likely colleague of Ralph Barric, whose role in the SARS-CoV-2 virus is starting to crystalize. Her piece, titled “No, your antibodies are not better than vaccination: An explainer,” is a textbook example of credentialed gaslighting and intentionally dodgy science.

There’s virtually zero truth to any assertion made in the article.

Zero.

These Covid “vaccines,” as we all now know, teach your bodies to make the pathogenic portion of the Wuhan virus — the original spike protein (in Delta, mutations in the spike protein render the gene transfer therapies almost entirely ineffective; so-called “breakthrough cases” are Delta cases brought about by both Delta’s antigenic escape — the vaccines aren’t designed to make the Delta spike, so the antibodies made are non-neutralizing — and the quickly waning immunity proffered by the shots). Meanwhile, catching and clearing the virus gives you variant independent immunity, because your body learns from the entire virus and develops a library of immunities — including, most importantly, b and t-cell immunity which will signal the body to make antibodies as needed long after the vaccine’s antibodies have faded. You’ll also have IgA immunity, which kills the virus at early replication sites — a feature not found in the vaccinated Covid naive.

Let me make this clear: It is scientifically and immunologically incoherent to argue that antibodies from one narrow part of a non-dominant viral strain is anywhere near on par with the immunity your body develops from the full virus. And no, it isn’t a matter of how severe your symptoms were.

Further, it’s also the case that there is no medical reason to take a vaccine for a virus you are immune to. The data are clear. 6 studies have shown an increase in adverse events when the Covid-recovered re-rev the production of the spike pathogen. (Here’s an overview of 3; the more recent studies I’ll link to at a later date).

The blatant disinformation our media and medical advisory agencies are peddling is an insult to anyone who has ever taken a vaccine. Add to that the fact that even the CDC acknowledges that these vaccines are non-sterilizing and can’t prevent acquisition and transmission of the virus — along with recent studies suggesting a subsequent vaccine to recovery actually *reduces* acquired immunity — and it’s become abundantly clear that the goal of “a needle in every arm” has nothing to do with Covid-19 and everything to do with some larger agenda.

Health care providers are making it more difficult to get a referral for serology testing for antibodies. My unsolicited advice: get a T-detect test if your doctor won’t refer you for IgM and IgG testing. If you have immunity, do not get an injection. There is no benefit save the ease with which compliance may allow you to have some of your liberties returned.

But then, doing so concedes the point that those liberties don’t belong to you in the first place.