Profile image
By Independent Media Review Analysis (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Amb. Alan Baker: Debunking 11 More False Assumptions Regarding Israel

Friday, January 13, 2017 7:57
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Debunking 11 More False Assumptions Regarding Israel
Amb. Alan Baker, January 10, 2017
Institute for Contemporary Affairs
Founded jointly with the Wechsler Family Foundation
No. 608 January 2017

Further to the recent publication of “Ten False Assumptions Regarding
Israel,” which addressed many of the widely-held and
universally-disseminated false and mistaken assumptions regarding Israel, a
number of additional false assumptions – some even more willful and
malicious – are addressed.

1. “Israel is committing genocide, mass murder and ethnic cleansing against
the Palestinian People” – a false and malicious blood-libel.

-This dangerous, cynical and dishonest allegation has become one of the “big
lies” disseminated on campuses and within the international human rights

Its proponents include individuals and organizations that purport to
advocate constitutional and human rights, but in fact indulge in the most
acute form of legal acrobatics and distortion of facts.

They selectively and maliciously misinterpret and twist legal principles,
statements, and writings in order to malign Israel and call into question
its very legitimacy and basis for its existence.

-The proponents of this blood libel cynically manipulate and reverse
historical fact by accusing Israel of entertaining an “incipiently genocidal
mentality towards Arab society,”1 and of committing out of revenge, the very
acts perpetrated against the Jewish people.

-The term “genocide” was coined in 1944 by the Jewish legal scholar Raphael
Lemkin, whose entire family was exterminated by the Nazis in Poland for
being Jews.2

- Contrary to these false accusations:
- Israel has never advocated, devised or entertained any plan, design or
campaign, systematic or otherwise, to undermine or destroy the Palestinian
people, or to act out of revenge or despair.
- Israel, the Jewish people, and Zionist movement have never entertained and
are prevented both constitutionally and morally from maintaining or
implementing any military, political, religious, economic or cultural
campaign, or policy intended to destroy the national, ethnical, racial, and
religious structure of the Palestinian people.
- Israel has never sought to prejudice the essential foundations of life of
the Palestinian people, or even to question its right to exist as a people.
- Israel has not indulged in mass-murder.
- Israel does not engage in ethnic cleansing, which runs solidly against the
moral, religious, and ethical codes of the Jewish people.

◾In its 1948, Declaration of Independence, Israel committed itself to
ensuring “freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel
and complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants
irrespective of religion, race, or sex.”3

-Israel undertook to guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language,
education, and culture. It committed itself to be faithful to the principles
of the Charter of the United Nations.

- Despite the offer of peace, good neighborliness, cooperation, and mutual
help in a common effort for the advancement of the entire Middle East, the
neighboring Arab states initiated a war in 1948, the declared aim of which
was to annihilate the new state of Israel.

- It was not Israel that initiated this conflict, but Israel was obliged to
defend its existence, its integrity and its population. Casualties and
displacement of persons during the conflict, as regrettable as they were,
were not part of any design or intent to destroy the Palestinian people, but
the results of armed conflict.

- By the same token, the hostilities of 1967 were the specific result of
attempts to strangle Israel militarily and economically. Israel’s resulting
entry into the West Bank and Gaza areas was not motivated by any design to
destroy or remove the Palestinian residents of the areas or to undermine
their rights as a people.
- Attempts to justify a claim of genocide by accusing Israel of “repeated
military assaults on Gaza,” as if Israel’s actions were gratuitous and
contrived, are no less absurd. They deliberately and manipulatively ignore
the thousands of rockets, attack-tunnels and other forms of terror emanating
from Gaza and directed against Israel’s civilian population by an
internationally acknowledged terror organization.
- It was not Israel but Hamas that murdered Palestinian children who were
digging tunnels for Hamas in Gaza,4 and who executed Palestinian residents
of Gaza for “morality crimes” and for “collaboration with Israel.”5

- Clearly, no serious, bona fide and self-respecting human rights expert or
organization could interpret Israel’s acting in self-defense as an act of
genocide aimed at destroying a people.

- In a similar context:
- It was not Israel that massacred 15,000 Palestinian residents living in
refugee camps in Jordan during the nine-day “Black September” Civil War
between Jordan and the PLO in 1970.6
- It was not Israel that expelled 400,000 Palestinians in 1991 from Kuwait
in retaliation for the PLO’s support of Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait
in 1990. 7
- It was not Israel that caused the displacement of 390,000 Palestinian
refugees in Syria since the Syrian conflict began in 2011.8
- It was not Israel that laid siege to the Palestinian Yarmouk refugee camp
in Damascus between 2013-2014 in which 18,000 civilians were trapped, with
scarce food, water, and medical supplies, leading to instances in which
Palestinian residents starved to death.9

- From the regional demographic standpoint, since Israel’s entry into the
West Bank areas of Judea and Samaria and into Gaza in 1967, the Palestinian
Arab population has increased from 954,898 to 4,654,421. This indicates an
increase of 387 percent.10

In this context, Palestinian life expectancy in the West Bank and Gaza has
climbed from 68.5 in 1990 to 72.9 in 2014.

One may ask how such statistics could serve as any logical basis, or be
considered compatible with the patently false, flawed and manipulative
allegation of a purported Israeli genocide of the Palestinian People.

2. “The Jews are not a people and have no rights in the Middle East” – False
and Misguided

-This curious claim would appear to be in total denial of the history of
civilization, from pre-Biblical and historic times and up to present day.

- The very existence of the Jews as an indigenous people, as well as its
roots, whether in their historic homeland in the “Holy Land” or throughout
the various Jewish diasporas and exiles, are borne out in pre-Bible historic
narratives as well as in Biblical scriptures including the Hebrew Bible, the
Christian Gospels and the Muslim Koran. This is all backed-up by readily
available and duly documented and exhibited archeological proof in museums
throughout the world.

- Judaism, the Hebrew language, and the Jewish People originated some 3,000
years ago in the area of the “Holy Land.” Christianity grew out of Judaism,
and the early Christian existence there was an integral part of the Jewish
settlement there. The presence of the two Jewish Temples in Jerusalem, and
their destruction (in 587 BCE and 70 CE), were acknowledged by Greek,
Persian and Roman pagan and Christian authors, travelers and historians, as
well as in Koranic references.

-The right to reestablish a national home for the Jewish People was
acknowledged in the 1917 Balfour Declaration. It was given international
legal recognition in the 1920 San Remo Declaration by the Supreme Council of
Principle Allied Powers. It was subsequently reaffirmed by the League of
Nations in 1922 as part of the British Mandate for Palestine, the opening
paragraphs of which gave recognition to “the historical connection of the
Jewish people within Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their
national home in that country.”11

- In addition to their historic and legal rights, the Jews, as one of the
oldest indigenous and aboriginal peoples still in existence, have indigenous
rights that are recognized by the international community.

3. “The establishment of Israel was a catastrophe for the Palestinians” –

-The perception of the creation of the State of Israel as a “catastrophe’
(Nakba) reflects a constant and on-going Palestinian narrative rejecting the
creation of a national state for the Jewish people in any part of Mandatory

This absolutist narrative sees uncompromising struggle against Israel as the
common national aim of the Palestinians, the very heart of the dispute.

-However, despite this, the establishment of the state of Israel was
nevertheless effected following a recommendation of the international
community in the 1947 UN General Assembly partition resolution, to establish
two independent states in Mandatory Palestine – a Jewish and an Arab one.
This reflected the acceptance by international community of the fundamental
rights of the Jewish and Arab populations to govern themselves in their own
independent sovereign entities.

- The State of Israel was not established in place of, nor as an alternative
entity to a Palestinian state. It was not established in denial of the
existence of the Arab residents of Mandatory Palestine. It was intended to
exist together with an Arab state in the area of Mandatory Palestine.

- Rather than accepting this plan and thereby giving up their absolutist aim
to create one Arab state in all the territory of Mandatory Palestine, the
Arabs of Palestine, together with neighboring Arab states members of the
Arab League, at the violent urgings of the Mufti of Jerusalem and Muslim
Brotherhood, rejected the partition plan and went to war against the Jewish
state. This despite some elements within the Palestinian Arab community who
were prepared to live in peace with the Jews.

- Despite the fact that the partition plan did not fully realize the hopes
of the Jewish population of Mandatory Palestine, they nevertheless chose to
accept it in the hope that is would indeed serve as a basis for peaceful
coexistence between the Arab and Jewish communities in Mandatory Palestine.

- It is widely acknowledged that the refusal by the Arab community and the
neighboring Arab states, to accept the partition plan, and their subsequent
failure to forcibly eliminate the Jewish state, and the sad consequences of
such failure including the emergence of the refugee problem, were entirely
their own doing. It was not the result of any action, inaction or injustice
by Israel. It was the result of short-sighted and unfortunate misjudgment
and a lack of clear, rational leadership among the Arab communities.

-The creation and subsequent acceptance of Israel by the international
community were considered by them to be a disastrous blow and a severe
mistake. Hence the use of the term “catastrophe” (Nakba) to symbolize the
Palestinian refugee issue.

Nakba day has become an annual day of mourning, violent demonstrations and
virulent incitement and propaganda in the attempt to undermine the
legitimacy of Israel.

- Presenting Israel’s creation as a “catastrophe,” rather than the
misjudgment, misguided policies, and decisions by the Arab leaders,
represents Israel’s detractors’ attempt to falsify and overturn the historic
narrative from one of inherent denial of the right of existence of a Jewish
state through aggression and rejectionism, to one of victimhood and denial
of rights.

◾It is also indicative of the fact that the Arabs’ original 1948 rejection
and denial of the right of existence of the state of Israel has not changed
and remains the central aim of their narrative.

Through well-orchestrated international brain-washing and incitement, the
Palestinian leadership seeks to further this false and fictitious narrative,
which is perceived by many to replace the true facts of the events of 1948.

-This attempt to undermine the very legitimacy of Israel as a Jewish state
is particularly evident in recent calls by Palestinian leaders for the
revocation of the 1917 Balfour Declaration, and their manipulation of
international organizations.

-Those subscribing to this false narrative, rather than relying on true
historical fact, are in fact being manipulated into becoming party to this

4. “Israel prevents the supply of water to the Palestinian population” –

- The false allegation by Palestinian leaders that Israel is waging a water
war in order to starve the Palestinian population, to prevent them from
leading a dignified life as a form of collective punishment, has been
willingly taken-up and amplified by international media.

- Additional false allegations include leaving thousands of Palestinians
without access to safe drinking water during the Islamic holy month of
Ramadan, a period of fasting, which can take place in the summer, at a time
when temperatures can exceed 35C. However, the opposite is the case. In
order to accommodate Palestinian daytime fasting during the Islamic holy
month of Ramadan, the water supply was increased during night-time.

- These accusations were recently repeated in a report issued by the UN
Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) claiming:

“Palestinians are prohibited from maintaining or digging water wells, while
Israel has been extracting much more water than the level stipulated by the
1993 Oslo Accords and confiscating 82 per cent of Palestinian groundwater.
The Palestinians are left with no choice but to import their own water from
Israel to cover 50 per cent of their consumption.”12

- The very opposite is in fact the case.

Israel undertook in the Oslo Accords to increase the water supply to the
Palestinians population in Judea and Samaria by 20 percent. In practice,
over the last 15 years, the water supply increased by about 50 percent, most
of which was designated for domestic consumption.13

-World-wide global trends for water consumption indicate a general decrease
in per-capita consumption over time due to population growth and
deterioration of water resources. The opposite is the case with the
Palestinian water usage, as a result of their increased access to water
since 1967. In 1967, only 10 percent of Palestinian households were
connected to water infrastructure, today, this figure has risen to 95

In fact, access by Palestinians to running water is better than by residents
of Amman and Damascus.14

-The net per-capita domestic water consumption of the Palestinians is higher
than the ‘minimum human need estimate’ given by the World Health
Organization – 100 liters per day per capita. This quantity is much above
the 50 liters per day per capita minimum to sustain life.

-In contravention of their commitments in the Oslo Accords, and ignoring the
resultant dangers of deterioration and salinization of the water quality,
the Palestinians unlawfully extract water by drilling and operating
unauthorized private wells. These are connected by the Palestinian Authority
to the electrical network. In addition, water-theft occurs through
unlicensed connections by Palestinian villages to Israel’s water system in
order to irrigate fields.

-Due to mismanagement, faulty maintenance, the Palestinians have not
succeeded in independently increasing their water supply.

-Since hardly any Palestinian farmers install water meters on their wells
and about half of the houses in the Palestinian towns and villages have no
meters, their governing authorities cannot monitor usage. Thus most
Palestinians do not pay for their water consumption and there is no monetary
incentive to conserve water.15

5. “Israel violates its obligations in the Oslo Accords” – False

- Israel considers the Oslo Accords16 to be the major component in
maintaining peaceful relations with the Palestinians. To this end Israel has
implemented its obligations pursuant to the accords in good faith,
irrespective of continuing obstructionism on the part of the Palestinian

◦ Israel redeployed its forces from areas A and B as required in the
security annex to the Interim Agreement, and transferred powers and
responsibilities in over 40 spheres of civil administration to the PA, as
set out in the civilian affairs annex to the Interim Agreement.

- Despite ongoing threats by the Palestinian leadership to suspend the
security cooperation and coordination in mutual security matters agreed to
in the security annex, Israel has consistently maintained close security
cooperation with the security authorities of the Palestinian Authority,
including the provision of weapons for the use of the Palestinian police.

- Israel regularly transfers funds, taxes and import duties to the
Palestinian Authority in the context of its obligations pursuant to the
annex on economic relations, irrespective of the huge debts owed by the
Palestinian Authority to Israeli bodies for provision by Israel of
electricity and to Israeli hospitals for medical treatment.

- While Israel has attempted to maintain and conduct ongoing daily
relations, at the professional level, with the various Palestinian
administrative authorities, in order to enable continued implementation of
various provisions of the agreements that require reciprocal coordination
and cooperation, the Palestinian leadership has refused to permit such
cooperation and has obstructed any such ongoing relations.

- Regrettably the Palestinians refuse to implement the annex on
Israeli-Palestinian cooperation programs, including the “People-to-People”
Program, initiated by Norway as a program to enhance dialogue and relations
at the grass-roots levels.

◾The long list of fundamental breaches by the Palestinians of some of their
most central and basic obligations have frustrated and continue to
jeopardize any further implementation of the Oslo Accords, or return to

◾Such fundamental breaches include:
◦Active support, encouragement and financing of terror and violence against
Israel and its population, and the maintenance of terror infrastructure
despite obligations to dismantle it;17
◦Wholesale acquisition, manufacture and provision of illegal weaponry for
purposes of terror;18
◦Daily hate indoctrination and incitement to violence and terror, from the
highest levels of Palestinian leadership and governance, through the
Palestinian media and education system and down to elementary schools and
kindergartens. This is in clear violation of the Palestinian obligation to
foster mutual understanding and tolerance.19
◦Attempts to unilaterally alter the status of the West Bank and the Gaza
Strip outside the negotiating process, through unilateral initiatives in the
United Nations and its Specialized Agencies and other international bodies,
including the false representation of the Palestinian Authority as a state,
accession to international conventions and conduct of foreign relations in
clear contravention of the accords;20
◦Initiation, organization and support, internally and internationally, of
economic and cultural boycotts and sanctions against Israel.21

-Israel has consistently expressed its readiness to resume and complete
negotiations in accordance with the Oslo Accords, without any preconditions,
on those core issues agreed-upon by both parties to be permanent status
negotiating issues. These include borders, Jerusalem, settlements, refugees,
security arrangements, relations and cooperation with other neighbors and
other issues of common interest.

-Regrettably the Palestinian leadership has imposed preconditions to any
return to negotiations. Such preconditions, pertaining to the very issues on
the negotiating table, in effect obviate any possibility of genuine and bona
fide negotiation.

-This calls into question their bona fides as a viable and serious partner
for negotiation.

6. “Israel is denying the ‘right of return’ to millions of Palestinian
refugees” – False.

-There exists no “right of return” for refugees in international law or
practice, and no international treaty or binding resolution by any
international body imposes any such obligation on Israel.

-Similarly, none of the agreements and documents agreed upon between Israel
and Egypt, the Palestinians and Jordan grants the refugees a right of

-The only specific, non-binding reference to “return” of Palestinian
refugees appears in article 11 of UN General Assembly resolution 194(III) of
December 11, 1948 where the UN recommended that refugees “wishing to return
to their homes and to live at peace with their neighbours should be
permitted to do so at the earlies practicable date, and that compensation
should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return.” 22

This resolution, which was rejected by the Arab states, established no right
and no obligation.

-Security Council Resolution 237 of 4 June 1967 regarding “facilitation of
the return of those inhabitants who have fled the areas since the outbreak
of hostilities,”23 does not speak of a “right” of return and, like most
Security Council resolutions, it is in the nature of a recommendation.

-Throughout the peace process, Israel has acknowledged the need to solve the
refugee issue through negotiation. In this context:

-Israel accepted the UN Security Council resolution 242 (1967) which
“affirmed the necessity for achieving a just settlement of the refugee

-In the 1978 Egypt-Israel Camp David Agreement (Framework for Peace in the
Middle East) Israel and Egypt agreed to establish “procedures for a prompt,
just and permanent implementation of the resolution of the refugee problem.”
They also established a “continuing committee” of representatives of Egypt,
Israel, Jordan and the Palestinians to agree on the modalities of admission
of persons displaced from the West Bank and Gaza in 1967.

-Israel actively participated in the Multilateral Working Group on Refugees
established by the 1991 Madrid Peace Conference and headed by Canada.

-Israel and the Palestinians agreed in the Declaration of Principles on
Interim Self-Government Arrangements of 1993 (Oslo I) that the modalities of
admission of displaced persons should be decided by agreement in a
“continuing committee,” and the issue of refugees should be one of the major
negotiating issues on the permanent status negotiating table.

-Similar provisions were agreed in the 1995 Israeli-Palestinian Interim
Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

-Jordan and Israel agreed, in the 1994 peace treaty between them, on the
need to solve the refugee problem both in the framework of the multilateral
working group established after the 1991 Madrid Peace Conference, and in
conjunction with the permanent status negotiations. The Treaty also refers
to UN and other agreed international economic programs concerning refugees
and displaced persons.

-In the same context, Israel has consistently maintained that the issue of
Jewish refugees and displaced persons from Arab states constitutes an
inherent component of any negotiation on refugees.

7. “BDS is a progressive, non-violent movement in the best tradition of
peaceful activism” – False and Deceptive

-The publicly stated goal of the BDS campaign is to delegitimize and isolate
Israel internationally. Its tactic is to portray Israel as the new
illegitimate apartheid South Africa, with the strategic objective of causing
Israel’s destruction through comprehensive political and economic warfare.

-BDS leaders and activists characterize their activities as a complementary
strategy to the policy of terror and political violence that Hamas, other
Palestinian groups, and Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations have
long embraced as part of their avowed effort to dismantle Israel as a
sovereign state.

-This is readily evident in the statements of the BDS leadership, including:
◦BDS leader Omar Barghouti “Definitely, most definitely we oppose a Jewish
state in any part of Palestine.”24
◦Ahmed Moor, BDS student leader and activist, “BDS is not another step on
the way to the final showdown; BDS is the final showdown.”25
◦As’ad Abu Khalil, BDS activist, California State University “Justice and
freedom for the Palestinians are incompatible with the existence of the
state of Israel.”26

◾The common chant used by BDS supporters, “From the river to the sea,
Palestine will be free” belies any claim that BDS is limited to a political
and economic agenda as a means of pressuring Israel to withdraw from the

To the contrary, it reveals BDS true intentions to “liberate” both the
disputed territories and pre-‘67 Israel from the Jews. This parallels the
stated goal of Hamas (an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood), Hizbullah,
Fatah, PLO groups, other radical Arab and Islamic organizations, which is to
destroy the nation-state of the Jewish people.

This has been described by Michael Gove, former British Minister of Justice
and Education as a “resurgent, mutating, lethal virus of anti-Semitism”
reminiscent of Nazi boycotts of Jews on the eve of the Holocaust.27

-A basic aim of the BDS campaign is to advocate internationally the
delegitimization of Israel and to promote persistent struggle against the
existence of a nation-state for the Jewish people in Israel. This is based
on a Palestinian narrative that denies both the existence of the Jewish
people as a sovereign nation, as well as the historic relationship of the
Jewish people to the land of Israel/Palestine.28 This narrative presents the
Palestinians as innocent victims of vicious Western and Israeli colonialism.

-The BDS movement has exercised tactical sophistication in camouflaging its
radical linkages and extremist ends in a language of peace, justice, and
human rights that appeal to well-meaning Western progressive organizations,
groups and individuals who generally support human-rights agendas.

In this manner the BDS movement is manipulating and abusing the bona-fides
of peace-loving and concerned people by misleading them into believing that
it is a genuine social movement propelled by non-violent resistance and
economic boycott, seeking to advance a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian

-While economic boycott of Israel is not a new phenomenon and has been used
by the Arab League since the establishment of Israel in 1948, its
reincarnation in the form of the BDS campaign is significant. In addition to
the Muslim terror groups sponsoring and supporting it, it includes new but
equally radical actors, including far-left Christian, and even Jewish and
Israeli groups and individuals.

As part of its effort towards globalization and mainstreaming, it has also
penetrated Western mainstream professional groups, trade unions, leading
academic institutions, and even the world of cultural and entertainment

-Rather than advancing prospects for peace and normal relations between the
Palestinians and Israel, the BDS campaign is inciting towards, and advancing
a policy of total boycott of and anti-normalization with Israel. This serves
to enhance polarization and hostility to Israel both in the Gaza and West
Bank, as well as in the international sphere.

-This is clearly the antithesis of any positive and constructive movement
towards a peaceful solution and bon-voisinage (good neighborly relations)
between the peoples of the area. In fact, it prejudices prospects for any
future Palestinian political and economic independence and positive trade
and security relationship with Israel. Its consequences include:
◦Encouraging radicalization of the Palestinian public discourse,
particularly among Palestinian youth, and undermining agreed-upon areas of
security and other forms of cooperation.
◦Distancing and alienating the Israeli public from considering further
concessions to reach a peace agreement.
◦Harming the employment security and social benefits to families, and even
causing the termination of more than 1000 Palestinian employees and
managers, and their families, working in Israeli companies operating in
those West Bank Industrial zones agreed upon and established pursuant to the
Oslo Accords.
◦Distancing Israeli and foreign investors from investing in the West Bank
and Gaza.

-The BDS campaign has had little effect on Israel’s GDP, and in fact,
several countries have taken steps to outlaw the BDS tactics, acknowledging
that the path to peace and reconciliation is paved through mutual political
social, economic and cultural engagement and normalization. In this context,
Palestinian workers and managers, who have lost their employment because of
BDS pressure, have begun to publicly oppose the BDS campaign.

At the same time, South African black intellectuals who suffered under the
apartheid regime have similarly emerged as opponents of the global BDS

-A similar sentiment has recently been enunciated by Jordanian Parliament
member Abed Almaala:29

BDS is a reckless act of hatred that threatens the ‎security and stability
of not only Israel, but also my country, Jordan, and the ‎entire Middle

BDS is a threat to us all – a threat to America as much as it is a threat to
‎Israel, Jordan and our Palestinian brothers.

BDS is not only hateful and shameful, but also strengthens Arab dictators
who hypocritically criticize Israel for alleged human rights violations when
they, themselves, are the world’s top ‎human rights violators.

8. “Israel is undermining the ‘two state solution’”- False and Misleading.

-Successive Israeli leaders have reiterated Israel’s principled support for
the vision of “two states for two peoples living side by side in peace and
security,” as the outcome of the negotiation process. This vision, initially
foreseen by former Israel Prime Minister Barak in 2000, was enunciated by
President George W. Bush in 2002 and is almost universally acknowledged by
the international community.

To accuse Israel of undermining or torpedoing the two-state solution would
appear to be ingenuous, unrealistic and even gratuitous.

-Logically, a two-state vision cannot be imposed by one-sided and
politically generated UN resolutions, by an international conference or any
other form of third-party intervention.

It can only be realized through active and bona-fide negotiation and
agreement between the parties on such basic, reciprocal issues as bilateral
borders, mutual recognition, essential security issues and bilateral
economic, commercial and political relationships between them.

-The Palestinian imposition of preconditions to any return to negotiations,
prejudging the substantive issues to be negotiated, and their maintenance of
an “all or nothing” negotiating strategy are incompatible with any logical,
bona-fide negotiating process. Such strategy has consistently undermined
efforts to resume negotiations.

-The Palestinian Authority’s support for and open incitement and
encouragement of acts of terror against Israel, their attempts to undermine
the very legitimacy of Israel and to initiate judicial proceedings against
Israel’s leadership, all demonstrate a clear determination against achieving
a negotiated two-state solution or any form of peaceful, neighborly

-A viable two-state solution envisages a unified Palestinian leadership.
Regrettably this has not materialized. Rather than utilizing Israel’s 2005
withdrawal from the Gaza Strip to advance the two-state solution, the
Palestinian leadership quickly lost power and control to the Hamas terror
organization which established its own independent terror regime in Gaza.

-This Hamas regime, identified with the Moslem Brotherhood and in ongoing
conflict with the Palestinian Authority, rejects any possibility of
political dialogue with Israel, and has launched three major terror
campaigns against Israel, in 2009, 2012, and 2014.

-Failure of the Palestinian Authority to secure a viable governing
administration in Gaza, together with the designs of Hamas to extend its
control of other Palestinian cities of the West Bank, does not inspire
confidence that the Palestinian leadership would be capable of honoring and
maintaining security or other agreements with Israel.

-The lack of a unified and agreed-upon Palestinian governance structure,
massive, widely-acknowledged corruption, internal violence, and intense
radicalization in schools, mosques and media in the West Bank and Gaza,
further prejudice chances of progressing toward a two state solution.

-Acceptance by the Palestinian leadership of concessions by Israel, while at
the same time consistently refusing offers to reach an agreed-upon “end to
the conflict” and to negotiate a final status, do not advance the chances of
a two state solution.

-Rejection and prevention by the Palestinian leadership, of viable
neighborly relationships at the people-to-people level, and support of
boycotts and divestment initiatives all run against any concept of
bon-voisinage (good neighborly relations) between the two peoples.

9. “Israel’s maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip is illegal” – False.

-It is widely acknowledged that the Palestinian Authority’s control in Gaza
was usurped by the Hamas, an internationally regarded terror organization,
sponsored and supplied with arms by Iran. Hamas and other terror groups such
as the Islamic Jihad have turned the area into a base for mounting terror
attacks against Israel.

To this end Hamas produces, smuggles into the area and stockpiles missiles,
guns, and ammunition for use against Israel and its civilian population. It
periodically directs such missiles randomly at Israeli civilian targets, in
violation of all accepted norms of international humanitarian law.

-In light of this acknowledged situation of armed conflict, Israel has the
prerogative to institute a naval and land blockade with a view to prevent
the introduction of weapons and materials that could serve the belligerent
purposes of Hamas. The institution of such a blockade is well established in
international law and practice.

-A naval blockade in such a situation once instituted and maintained in
accordance with the rules of international law with the appropriate public
notification as to the area of sea that it covers effective enforcement,
impartiality and consideration of humanitarian needs of the population, is
fully in accordance with accepted international law and practice.

-In accordance with the findings of the UN Secretary General’s Panel of
Inquiry on the 2010 Flotilla Incident:

The fundamental principle of the freedom of navigation on the high seas is
subject to only certain limited exceptions under international law. Israel
faces a real threat to its security from militant groups in Gaza. The naval
blockade was imposed as a legitimate security measure in order to prevent
weapons from entering Gaza by sea and its implementation complied with the
requirements of international law.”30

-Despite the ongoing, declared hostile intentions of the Hamas
administration in Gaza, and its renewed construction of tunnels and
manufacture of rockets for use against Israel, Israel maintains an ongoing
civilian policy enabling the transfer of commodities via the different
overland crossings, civilian entry to and from the Gaza Strip with emphasis
on the evacuation of Palestinian patients for medical treatment in Israel,
the promotion of projects by international community, and coordination of
operations and aid in agriculture, transportation, trade and industry.
Pursuant to the recent agreement between Israel and Turkey, increased
amounts of aid from Turkey are passing into the Gaza Strip.

10. Israel is conducting extrajudicial murders and is randomly and
cold-bloodedly executing Palestinians – False and Malicious

-In light of the clear video footage showing random knife attacks against
Israelis by incited Palestinians passing through check-points and in other
locations, it is incredulous to see how the Palestinian and Arab League
leaders and spokesmen have the gall to manufacture a blatantly false
narrative, boldly and openly accusing Israel of randomly executing these
people in cold-blood.

-It is no less incredulous to see the extent to which these lies are so
readily accepted by the international media, by leading Western and Arab
political personalities and even by various foreign and Israeli academics,
who rush to accuse Israel’s police who are defending themselves against
these knifings, of carrying out “indiscriminate,” “barbaric” or
“extrajudicial” executions.

-By allowing themselves to be influenced by such false and manipulative lies
and by accepting and propagating them, the international media and some
leading western political personalities are in fact giving encouragement and
license to the Palestinian leadership to continue its incitement to such
violence by individuals. The Palestinian leadership instigating this
incitement knows that it will be viewed sympathetically in the West and that
Israel will be condemned for defending against such attacks.

-Claims by Palestinian leaders considered by the international community to
be “moderate,” justifying such terrorist knifings and citing “lack of hope”
or “desperation” by the perpetrators of such terror, cannot be considered
acceptable by any moral standard.

-Even the UN General Assembly annually resolves, “Criminal acts intended or
calculated to provoke a state of terror in the general public, a group of
persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any
circumstances unjustifiable, whatever the considerations of a political,
philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other nature that
may be invoked to justify them.”31

11. “Israel committed war crimes in the Gaza Strip including the
indiscriminate murder of children” – False

-Almost inevitably, whenever Israel is obliged to defend its population and
territorial integrity from unbridled and indiscriminate terror emanating
from beyond its borders, whether from Hamas in the Gaza Strip or from
Hezbollah in Lebanon, Israel is accused of exercising “disproportionate
force” and of committing war crimes.

-Such accusations are gratuitous and inherently false. They ignore the
unique and unprecedented nature of the terrorism unleashed against Israel,
the tactics and strategy of which deliberately abuse and violate accepted
civilized and humanitarian norms, and the realities of combat in the Gaza

-The allegations against Israel knowingly manipulate casualty statistics in
order to establish false and disproportionate equivalences between Israel, a
sovereign country bound by international humanitarian norms, and terror
groups that knowingly and deliberately abuse such norms.

-They ignore the fact that the terror groups deliberately, as a matter of
military tactic, take advantage of, and rely on the humanitarian limitations
that Israel, as a member of the international community, imposes on its
forces in seeking to avoid civilian casualties. Such tactics include:
◦Cruelly forcing civilians, including children to serve as human shields and
denying them access to shelter;
◦the deliberate use of private homes, schools, medical facilities and
religious locations for storage and operation of rockets and other
ammunition, as access-points to operational tunnels and as headquarters for
terror activity;
◦willful and indiscriminate targeting of populated civilian centers, public
facilities, schools and religious locations within Israel;
◦a declared aim of kidnapping Israeli citizens for purposes of

-The use of civilian facilities and the forced use of human shields are a
deliberate tactic and widely used strategy in the arsenal of these terror
groups. They rely on the likelihood that any military and defensive
retaliation by Israel would likely endanger and harm those innocent
civilians and thereby generate the accusations levelled against Israel.

-The Hamas terror organization has proudly admitted that its fighters are
instructed to use human shields in order to purposely suffer civilian deaths
and thereby increase international pressure and blame on Israel. 32

Former Hamas interior minister Fathi Hamad boasted in 2008 that Hamas
fighters “formed human shields of the women, the children, the elderly, and
the mujahedeen in order to challenge the Zionist bombing machine.”33

-Such tactics and strategy are widely known and acknowledged throughout the
international community. Leading political personalities in the U.S. and
Europe, as well as the various international and local organizations and
bodies purporting to uphold compliance with humanitarian norms are fully
aware of the serious humanitarian dilemmas and challenges faced by Israel in
attempting to defend itself against such terrorism, while at the same time
minimizing civilian casualties.

-Leading military experts, after reviewing Israel’s military actions, have
commented on the fact that “Israel had gone to extraordinary lengths to
limit collateral damage and prevent civilian casualties in the Gaza
conflict.”34(Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of

Similarly, the British military expert Col. Richard Kemp has testified to
the fact that Israel’s forces “did more to safeguard the rights of civilians
in a combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare.”35

-In the absence of clear and accepted international criteria for dealing
with unbridled abuse of humanitarian norms by terror organizations, those
making allegations against Israel choose rather to ignore and overlook the
dilemmas and challenges faced by Israel in defending itself against such

-Humanitarian norms are an inherent part of the legal obligations on Israel’s
military. Israel’s judicial and military authorities are obligated to
investigate accusations of abuse of humanitarian norms, and where relevant
to taking the appropriate juridical measures.

* * *


1 Center of Constitutional Rights, The Genocide of the Palestinian People:
An International Law and Human Rights Perspective; Martin Shaw, Palestine In
An International Historical Perspective On Genocide, 9 Holy Land Studies 1,
13 (2010)

2 Raphael Lemkin, Genocide- A Modern Crime, 4 Free World 39 (1945),









11 – The Palestine
Mandate, Council of League of Nations

12 –
UNCTAD report



15 pg. 28









Dan Diker

25 Behind the Contemporary BDS Campaign, Dan



28, PLO Charter

29, Abed

30 Report of the Secretary-General’s Panel of Inquiry on the 31 May 2010
Flotilla Incident, pg. 4,

31 United Nations General Assembly Resolution 55-158- Measures to Eliminate
International Terrorism- 12 December 2000,





About Amb. Alan Baker

Amb. Alan Baker is Director of the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the
Jerusalem Center and the head of the Global Law Forum. He participated in
the negotiation and drafting of the Oslo Accords with the Palestinians, as
well as agreements and peace treaties with Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon. He
served as legal adviser and deputy director-general of Israel’s Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and as Israel’s ambassador to Canada. Twitter: @AmbAlanBaker


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 4 comments
  • desertspeaks

    Amb. Alan Baker has to prove ONE THING.. that god exists.. without evidence supported by tangible factual personal firsthand irrefutable evidence proving god exists.. Israeli’s have no claim and are nothing more than pathological lying psychopaths who are murdering PALESTINIANS to facilitate the THEFT OF PALESTINE!

  • wiseoldlady

    The jews in Israel are not the real jews but fake jews of Mongolian blood originating in Khazaria. They are not semetic….they converted to judism in 800s AD. So you can debunk all you want facts are facts and obviously you are in denial of facts.

  • Gina

    Twisted rationale to support an agenda conceived by the Zionists who want control of the resources of the Middle East. Christianity did not grow out of Judaism. Christ established it with His death on the cross, which sacrifice made all animal sacrificial practices of Judaism profane. God called those still who were still offering those animal sacrifices at that earthly temple in Jerusalem in the first century A.D., those who claimed to be Jews but who were not, were of the synagogue of Satan!

    God destroyed that temple, and ended that profane system. Christ came in judgment against them in A.D. 70 using the Romans to bring down fire from heaven. Titus had the lightning bolt as his standard, and sent balls of fire upon Jerusalem. This destruction was foretold to all of those living in that “great city” before its destruction. Matt. 22, Matt. 24, Mark 13, Luke 21, and much of Revelation.

    The last days were not speaking of the end of the physical world, but the end of the old covenant. The old covenant with Israel was about to pass away in the first century A.D., and was being replaced with the new covenant of Christ’s blood, with the new kingdom that is not of this world, but is in the midst of all those who are in Christ.

    That old city of Jerusalem and its temple was destroyed in A.D. 70 and was condemned by God. How dare man decide that something God called profane is somehow again holy? !! The state of Israel established by force in 1948 through the machinations of the Balfour Declaration is not from God!

    See evidences from the scriptures at Start with Part I of It’s Not The End of The World, and work through Part X. Other articles for The Whore of Babylon, The Beast of Revelation, The Seventy Weeks of Dan. 9 will be of interest.

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.