Profile image
By Eric Peters Autos
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

2017 Chevy Bolt… vs. 2017 Chevy Sonic

Wednesday, November 2, 2016 5:47
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Automobiles, Motorcycles and Libertarian Politics

I had planned to review the new Chevy Bolt electric car based on a test drive – but GM has rescinded my privileges for reasons knownst only to them but strongly suspected by me. So, this review will focus on the things that are knownst about the Bolt without actually having driven the thing.

Which would have been a challenge regardless – given its maximum range is “up to” 238 miles.

Beware the “up to.” It is marketing cheese.

They never say “at least.”production-line

It is always the most optimistic – and almost never actually achievable – scenario. (See late night infomercials about real estate/multi-level marketing flim-flams.)

This “up to” business is something to consider carefully when considering a pure electric car like the Bolt. Because unlike a hybrid electric car like the Volt (which isn’t a bad car, actually; see my review based on actual pre GM contretemps seat time) when the Bolt runs out of juice you are dead in the water for at least – not “up to” – half an hour to 45 minutes.

That’s assuming you can find and plug into a high voltage “fast” charger.

These are not generally available, however. Which means plugging into a regular 120V household outlet, just like you would a toaster.17-bolt-dashboard

And that means hours of recharge time – probably overnight.

So, “up to” 238 miles is dicey. Unless you’re in no hurry.

In real-world driving it is probable the Bolt’s range is less than 238 miles. Especially in electric car-unfriendly conditions such as very hot days when you’ll want to run the AC (which is run by the batteries) or very cold days (when you’ll want heat, also made electrically in the Bolt) or at night when you’ll want to turn the headlights on (also drains the battery).

The Bolt’s “up to” range also probably assumes slow driving.

Electrics do their best when they aren’t actually moving. When they are stationary. This is how a hybrid saves gas. The IC engine shuts down while the vehicle is “idling” at a red light. The electric motor/battery pack combo is very efficient during low-speed/stop-and-go driving.17-bolt-batteries

But on the highway, at high speeds, the dynamic changes.

When I test drove the Volt, I got about 50 miles down the road on the batteries. Which is very good for an electric car. But it also isn’t very far. Thank god for the IC engine the Volt carries around as a back-up generator. Without it, the Volt is useless for other than commuting.

The Bolt hasn’t got IC back-up.

Once its batteries wilt, you walk. Even if it does go “up to” 238 miles, regardless of AC (and heat) use, or burning headlights, or driving 75 on the highway – that’s still not genug for a trip to Disneyland … unless you happen to live “up to” no more than 238 miles away.   

And if the actual/real-world range is say 100 miles or so…

I asked GM to send me one, so I could find out what the real deal is – and report that to you.soup-nazi

But they are withholding – which is telling.

If the car does have a realistic 200-plus mile range, you’d think they’d want it confirmed by skeptical journalists such as myself. I did, after all, write honestly – favorably – about the Volt.

When a major car company holds its cards close about a car, you have to wonder about the car.

But these are speculations. Let’s return to facts.

A Bolt stickers for $36,620.

A Sonic hatchback – very similar car except for its drivetrain – stickers for $17,580. This is roughly half the price of the Bolt.2017 Chevrolet Sonic

Put another way, you’d spend $19,040 to buy a Bolt rather than a Sonic.

Or, put the $19k and change in your pocket instead.

Unleaded regular is currently selling for about $2.20 per gallon. You could buy 41,888 gallons of gas for the $19,040 you just pocketed by not buying the Bolt.

The Sonic’s “combined” mileage with its standard 1.8 liter IC engine 30 MPG according to the EPA (26 city, 35 highway).

At that rate, you could drive your new Sonic (cue Dr. Evil voice) One million two-hundred-fifty-six-thousand-six-hundred-forty miles.dr-evil

In other words, “break even” (if you bought the Bolt) is a very long way down the road.

Now, you would get a government give-away (i.e., a tax subsidy) of about $7k for buying the Bolt rather than the IC-engined Sonic.

The math still sucks.

The price of gas would need to double or triple before the Bolt – before any pure electric car – even begins to make economic sense.

And practical sense remains dicey regardless of the cost of fuel.17-volt-on-flatbed

Maybe the Bolt can travel “up to” 238 miles.

The Sonic (which I have driven) absolutely can go almost twice as far (402.6 miles) and it can be refueled and ready for another 400.2 miles in less than 5 minutes at any gas station.

Which – unlike a “fast” charger – isn’t hard to find.

We live in a fast-paced world. People chafe at waiting 5 minutes in a Drive-thru for their lunch. Who believes people will wait 30-45 minutes for their electric car to recharge every 200 miles or so?

How about every 100 miles or so?    

How about for several hours?

But let’s go back to the facts.on-da-pipe

There is no way to juggle the numbers and have the Bolt come out as the economically sensible choice.

And for $36k – to start – you could by a Lexus.

Maybe not an electric one. But so?

If economy is no longer the criteria, if function isn’t a factor, then brand cachet and luxury and performance must be.

The Bolt looks like what it is – a subcompact Chevy economy car. Only it’s not exactly economical.

It’s also not exactly luxurious, either.17-bolt-side-view

Ok, it comes standard with 17 inch wheels and a large (10.2 inch) LCD touchscreen. The base Sonic has 15 inch wheels and a smaller (7 inch) LCD touchscreen. Both cars come standard with AC and power windows and locks. The Bolt has a better stereo (six speakers vs. the Sonic’s four) but both have 4G in-car WiFi and Bluetooth and the same basic suite of apps.

Is it worth paying almost $20k more to get two more speakers and a 3 inch larger touchscreen?

The Bolt is quicker – zero to 60 takes about 7 seconds vs. about 8.4 for the IC-engined Sonic.17-bolt-last

Neither car is slow.

But the Sonic goes much farther, with much less hassle.

For about half the price.   

So, you tell me. Would you buy one?

People didn’t buy the Spark EV. It went over like a box of dildos sent to the Pope.

I’d love to be able to tell you more about the way the Bolt drives. But GM would have to let me drive one.

Or rather, flatbed one down to me.

I guess we’ll see! depends on you to keep the wheels turning! Clovers hate us!

Goo-guhl blackballed us!

Will you help us?

Our donate button is here.

 If you prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:

721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079

EPautos stickers – new design, larger and magnetic! – are free to those who send in $10 or more to support the site.epautoslogo


The post 2017 Chevy Bolt… vs. 2017 Chevy Sonic appeared first on EPautos – Libertarian Car Talk.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.