Spiderman versus Godzilla?

(8:36:41) Mon May 19, 2014

GODZILLA 
versus Spiderman?

Never before has a movie with so much, done so little.  Of course, I am referring to the latest Spiderman flop.  Goofy, choppy, and meaningless action, storyline, technology, and threats with a complete lack of interest and surprise.  Yet, it inherited raving reviews by the movie critics, while Godzilla received boring, blah, wait till the end ratings despite its perfectly melded storyline, special effects, combats (both military and monster), and constantly satisfying the show me the creatures anticipation.  Even the opening credits were creatively done with old style news clips and redactions.

There is a clear pattern employed by movie critics, established beyond the days of Siskel and Ebert.  They work for the movie industries and receive special access in exchange for good reviews. DUH!  It helps both parties by filling seats and elevating careers.  However, always giving good reviews diminishes credibility.  The lemming masses that follow them will catch-on.  So, good movies that will receive a flood of sales anyway, get bad reviews delivered in a positive way.

My only criticism of Godzilla was the implied mission.  Godzilla protects humanity or eradicates ancient monsters, then goes back to sleep.  It would be more believable if the highly radioactive creatures attract Godzilla because that’s what he eats.  Once killed and devoured, he returns to his subterranean lair where there is adequate munchies.

I wanted to walk out of the Amazing [pointless] Spiderman, and wanted an encore of Godzilla; even waited through all the credits hoping for another look at this amazing childhood creature.