Breaking: Arrest Warrant Issued For Pat Boone; Recall Obama Defied Court Order

The levels of hypocrisy surrounding the fraud and soon to be exposed criminal actions intending to hide and cover-up the ineligibility of Barack Obama are so pervasive and audacious that this era in U.S. American history will be studied with much avidity for decades to come.  Just when you think you have seen it all, another reporter once again revels in the opportunity to ridicule a “birther”.

Charles Eugene “Pat” Boone, a successful American entertainer recently had a brush with the law for missing a court hearing while vacationing in Hawaii.  As a result, the judge has issued an arrest warrant.

No one is above the law, however it should be pointed out that the news media should cease and desist from using the pejorative term “birther” to ridicule and silence skeptics merely seeking the truth about Obama’s birth narrative until they are willing to concede their failure to vet Obama.  They should include a disclaimer in their reports that they failed to investigate the veracity of the original “birther” claim when Hillary Clinton’s camp first raised the issue on the campaign trail in 2008; and also when the results of an official law enforcement investigation declared Obama’s ID documents to be forgeries and fraudulently placed on the White House website to deceive the American public.

As a plaintiff in one of the many ballot challenges, I exercised my right to compel Obama to produce proof he is who he says he is with certified court records through the legal procedure known as “discovery” and thereby adjudicate his Constitutional eligibility.  Unfortunately, justice was not served in my case and Obama flippantly ignored the court-ordered subpoena even after the GA Secretary of State issued a stern warning that lest he appear, his failure would have consequences…”you do so at your own peril.”

So when Obama has the audacity to defy a court-ordered subpoena, the rule of law is suspended. However, when anyone else does it; the news media accepts the double standard and hypocritically plays the “birther” card with glee. [.] - By Former CNN Producer and GA Ballot Challenge Plaintiff Kevin Richard Powell.

Newser reports: Pat Boone Is a Wanted Man

ARREST WARRANT ISSUED AFTER HE FAILS TO SHOW UP IN COURT

(NEWSER) – Singer, Tea Party activist, and birther Pat Boone can add one more title to his long list: wanted man. There’s a warrant out for the 79-year-old after he was subpoenaed to appear in court and failed to show up, TMZ reports. It all relates to a luxury cruise ship’s condos, the San Jose Mercury News explains. Investors ended up suing the company building the ship, and the company lost; it was ordered to pay $800,000 in legal costs but allegedly never did, so now the investors are going after people who purchased the condos—including, in TMZ’s telling, Boone, hence the court appearance. [...] – Continued @ Newser.

Notice To Produce 19 Jan 2012

Pursuant to OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.19, Defendant Barack Obama is hereby notified to be and appear before the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, the Honorable Michael M. Malihi presiding, at the Fulton County Justice Center Building, 161 Pryor Street, Courtroom G-40, Atlanta, Georgia on January 26, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and to bring with him into said Court the following items to be used as evidence by the Plaintiffs in the above-styled case:

(a) One (1) of the two (2) original certified copies of Defendant Barack Obama’s (“long form”) Certificate of Live Birth as referenced in the four (4) pages of
Exhibit “A” attached;
(b) All medical, religious, administrative, or other records of or relating to Defendant Barack Obama’s birth;
(c) Any and all United States Passports, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama;
(d) Any and all passports, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama from any country, nation, or sovereignty;
(e) Any and all college and university admission information, both undergraduate and postgraduate, for Defendant Barack Obama, including, but not limited to, admission applications; letters of recommendation; school transcripts;” financial aid applications;
scholarship applications; and any and all correspondence awarding admission, financial aid,
scholarships, or the like;
(f) Any and all applications and accompanying materials submitted by or for Defendant Barack Obama to the State Bar of Illinois, the State Supreme Court of Illinois, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, and any other similar entity regulating the admission to the practice of law;
(g) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant Barack Obama;
(h) Any and all documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant’s father,
Barack Obama, Sr.
(i) All correspondence between Defendant Barack Obama and any other person, firm, political party, or entity discussing Defendant’s status vel non as a natural born Citizen pursuant to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

Defendant will note that the preceding items are requested hereby, whether they pertain to Defendant under his name Barack Ohama or any other name, including but not limited to Barack Hussein Ohama II; Barry Soetoro; Barry Soebarkah; Barry Ohama, or the like.

Herein fail not under penalty of law.

This 19th day of January, 2012.

Judge Mailihi

Order on Motion to Quash Suboenas 20 Jan 2012
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012. In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony… [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.” Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).

Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court’s rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party’s counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to quash is denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.
MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge