Drudge writes about Arpaio/Klayman case, which was dismissed, but does not write about my case in the 9th circuit, where I was granted a hearing and it was already found that my client, former Pres. Candidate, Keith Judd, was granted standing. Was Drudge, like WND and Birther report, paid by Arpaio to promote him and quash any news about my cases?

Press release

Law Offices of Orly Taitz

9th Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral argument in case Grinols, Judd et al v Electoral college, Obama, Biden, Governor of CA, Secretary of State of CA.

This case was filed by CA attorney Orly Taitz.  In this case the District Court judge, Morrison C England,  has already found that  presidential candidate, Keith Judd, who received 40% running against Obama in 2012 WV Democratic party primary, had standing to proceed with the law suit against Barack Obama based on evidence that Obama  is using a stolen CT Social Security number and all fabricated IDs. However, the judge ruled that this is not a justiciable issue, meaning that the court cannot rule on eligibility of the candidate. The argument was laughable and an insult to intelligence of every American citizen, as time and again the courts ruled on eligibility of a candidate. What is even more appalling and disturbing, is that in the same federal court in Sacramento, around the same time another presidential candidate, Peta Lindsey, was found to be ineligible due to the fact that she was not 35 years old and as such not eligible. Lindsey was thrown of the ballot. When her attorney claimed in the 9th circuit that the issue is not justiciable, the 9th Circuit found it to be justiciable. So Attorney Taitz and her clients have a perfect precedent and the law on their side. If the judges will not be corrupt, they will have no other choice but to rule in favor of the plaintiffs.

So far no conservative or “dissident” media reported on this hearing, yet they reported on other cases, which are being dismissed. The question is “Why?”. Attorney Orly Taitz is urging all patriots to be at the hearing on October 20th and spread the word by forwarding this announcement to media outlets around the country.
This issue is more important today than ever, we need a declaratory relief on Obama’s lack of citizenship, his lack of valid Social Security number and valid IDs, we need a relief on his lack of eligibility and his lack of allegiance to this county. Obama’s actions of completely bankrupting this nation with 10 trillion of additional debt, cuts the military and recent deal with Iran are a bigger threat to this nation that Clinton’s e-mails. Success in this case will lead to eventual adjudication that Obama’s deals, bills and executive orders are null and void, as he was signing those based on fraud, asserting his identity and eligibility for presidency based on bogus IDs.

Taitz will be asking the court to give her additional time for this important case. Additionally, Taitz works pro bono and any and all donations are greatly appreciated and can be given at wwwOrlyTaitzESQ.com or by mail to 29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Calendar for James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, San Francisco Oral Argument Notice

Location Address

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse
95 Seventh Street
San Francisco CA 94103

Appeals court rules against Sheriff Joe in immigration dispute…