Was It Really Bin Laden? What Happens In Sharks Stays In Sharks

A new WebToday viral video is circulating on the Internet posing the question of, “If it wasn’t bin Laden, then who took the bullets?”

Here’s the link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy_o-GjOJTY&feature=channel_video_title

Here’s the script.

Someone was killed in the May 1, 2011 ambush in Abbottabad, Pakistan and quickly fed to sharks. But who was it? Was it really Osama bin Ladin? If so, where’s corpse? Where’s the autopsy? Where’s the photos? Where’s the Death Certificate?

Just as millions of Americans were expecting closure, Obama made the mind-numbing, seemingly insane decision to dispose of the body within 24-hours and calling it a burial at sea!

Many geopolitical experts contend that the person killed could not have been Osama bin Laden since he reportedly had severe kidney failure and was on dialysis while on the run and most likely died of either natural or unnatural causes sometime between 2001 and 2004. So the question now is: If it wasn’t bin Laden, who took the bullets?

Let me ask you a question. Does this quick execution and wet burial pass your smell test? Or does this look more like a scene from the movie Wag the Dog? Are we truly to believe that the U.S. government used more than one trillion dollars of hard-earned taxpayer money to capture the so-called head of Al Qaeda, only to flush it down some toilet out to sea? If so, bin Laden’s body was the most expensive shark food in human history! What’s wrong with this picture? It kind of reminds me of the T-shirt slogan that says, “My parents vacationed in Disneyland and only gave me this lousy T-Shirt. But in this bin Laden debacle, for our trillion dollars, we’d didn’t even get a lousy T-shirt! We didn’t even get a photograph!

Does this pass your smell test? Let’s investigate further but let’s do so fearlessly with an open mind and fortitude, regardless of what the government or dominant news media of our day may be telling us what to think.

So, just how serious is kidney failure? And how difficult is it to obtain proper treatment, including dialysis, in a cave without electricity, or even in a Third World fortified compound? Is it even possible to stay alive, on the run, if he was in such bad condition for more than a decade?

Simply enter the search phrase into your favorite Internet search engine: “What is the life expectancy for a person on dialysis?” and you will likely find what I found. This one was from Yahoo answers:

“Let me give it to you straight. If she started dialysis today, on average, she would live 3-5 more years. The annual mortality rate for End Stage Renal Disease patients is 22%.”

Again, this is presumably care in a Western hospital with the latest and greatest technology. So it doesn’t take a rocket scientist or a team of medical researchers to conclude that advanced kidney dialysis is difficult to secure for a patient on the run, hiding in a cave or a fortified compound ‘without a phone or an Internet connection’ such as the Abbottbad fortress. And in the highly unlikely event that bin Laden beat all odds and stayed alive all the way until 2011, bin Laden certainly would look significantly older than he does in old pictures from the late 1990′s that we’ve all seen hundreds of times. And he certainly wouldn’t be up for a macho 40 minute gun fight as purported to have occurred before the truth-challenged Obama administration was discredited with that whopper. Of course, there is also the original reports of bin Laden’s dialysis may have been disinformation. Nonetheless, the entire matter from siege to stonewalling is totally trying the trust of the American people.

Remember the first photos of the alleged dead bin Laden that were published worldwide? It is patently absurd that large newspapers like The Daily Mail of London would stoop so low as to published these years-old doctored pictures of bin Laden. Those obvious frauds didn’t even show one extra white hair in his beard, even after a decade of being on the run and possibly on dialysis! His head is in the same cocked position and his skin has no additional wrinkles. If nothing else, after 10 years, wouldn’t’ you think his ears might have grown? After all, ears and noses tend to keep growing in our old age. And speaking of noses growing, do the contemporary “Obama-as-Superman” mass media-in-lockstep with the government stories have any more credence than tales of Pinocchio, Santa Claus, The Easter Bunny, or TV wrestling?

But rather than relying upon fairy tales for our information, let’s turn to a “real” U.S. President to see what he has to say on this matter.

Play the NBC Video of Obama claiming Obama had bin Laden killed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqAMkDstPiU

Obama video at: marker of 4:04: Obama: “Today at my direction the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of Americans carried out that operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed.”

If bin Laden is already dead then who was killed in this operation? And why were we first told bin Laden was killed in mid April and later Obama said he killed him on May 1? Why the continually changing stories? Which version of Obama’s ‘truth’ are we supposed to believe? And how can we believe the next thing that comes from his lips?

And even if Barack Obama was telling the truth about killing bin Laden, and if we really killed the #1 most wanted radical Islamic Jihadist leader of all time, then why would Obama grasp defeat from the jaws of victory by saying we are not at war with Islam and never have been? Listen to how Barack Obama surrenders the United States of America to Islam and a promise of perpetual surrender!

Play tape at 5:01: “We must also reaffirm that The United States is not and never will be at war with Islam.”

Huh? This doesn’t pass the smell test either, now does it? Perhaps with all this late night satellite surveillance Obama was tired and drifted off teleprompter for a moment. Let’s take a closer look and give him the benefit of the doubt.

Play video at 5:19: “Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader.” He was a mass murderer of Muslims.”

Huh? The number one Muslim leader in the world, the most wanted Islamic terrorist leader in the world is not an Islamic leader??? A mass murderer of Muslims? Let’s watch that again.

Play video at 5:19 “Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader.” He was a mass murderer of Muslims.”

Huh? A mass murderer of Muslims? I don’t recall masses of Muslims in the World Trade Center or Pentagon. Those were Americans, Mr. Obama! Where is your sympathy for U.S. citizens? Why are you only expressing grief only for Muslims? Why whitewash this war as if it had nothing to do with Muslims?

As David Rubin, a former mayor of Shiloh, Israel, aptly reminded Mr. Obama, “Every major terrorist attack in the past twenty years has been carried out by ideological Muslims, whether by Hamas, Al Qaeda, Islamic Jihad, Fatah, or Hizballah, and it’s no accident.”

Scores of geopolitical heavyweights opined that bin Laden was dead in the in the early 2000′s, including Henry Kissinger’s Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and former doctor Steve Pieczenik, who stated in 2002 that bin Laden was dead. “As a physician, he stated, “I knew that he (bin Laden) had to have two dialysis machines and he was dying.”

So, if Osama bin Laden died nearly a decade ago, why the charade? What the delay in announcing his death? And what about the reports of bin Laden being stored on ice, awaiting the appropriate time to announce his demise? Was that simply to provide a matching DNA sample? And why oh, why, oh why was the alleged “appropriate time” to kill that person in Pakistan on the highest satanic holiday of the year?: May Day, otherwise known as Walpurgis Night? If this isn’t creepy, I don’t know what is. High level Satanists know that a human blood sacrifice is required just before dawn on Walpurgis Night, in hopes to acquire greater power from Satan! And the killing of someone, be it bin Laden or otherwise, appears to have been just before dawn, fitting the satanic rule for the ritualistic killing!

Indeed, May 1 is a favorite among world despots, communists and Satanists. Here are just a few significant events that occurred on May 1. Call it coincidence or intentionally occurring on a satanic holiday or sheer superstition, but call it May 1:

On May 1, 1945 (picture of Hitler) Adolf Hitler was pronounced dead, yet FBI archive records now show Hitler didn’t die but rather fled to South America. It’s right on the FBI web site at: http://vault.fbi.gov/adolf-hitler/adolf-hitler-part-01-of-04/view (show on screen)

On May 1, 1931 (picture of Empire State Building) The Empire State Bldg was opened in New York City. Sounds like someone didn’t want any competition with other tall buildings.

On May 1, 1961 (picture Castro) Fidel Castro proclaimed Cuba a socialist nation and abolished elections.

And on May 1, 2003 (picture Bush) George W. Bush gave the famous “Mission Accomplished” speech aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, declaring major combat operations in Iraq had ended.

On May 1, 1948 (picture) Kim II Sung established The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

On May 1, 1785 (picture) Obama’s so-called home state of Hawaii was first established as a kingdom when King Kamehameha defeated Kalanikupule.

And of course, the grand daddies of virtually all modern conspiracy theories: (picture) The Illuninati was founded on May 1, 1776 in Upper Bavaria by Adam Weishaupt.

Oh, did we leave out (picture) Elvis? Strange but true: Elvis Presley married his beloved Priscilla on May 1, 1967.

So there you have it: Osama bin Laden was supposedly killed on May 1, 2011, with Obama more or less saying, “I’m from the government. I’m your hero and I’m here to help you. No autopsy showing kidney failure, no photos, and no death certificate. Oh, but since I’m from the government you must trust me and if you don’t, you’re a conspiracy freak!”

Hey, call me a conspiracy freak, but call. Call me anything other than just another lemming leaping off the cliff to the drumbeat of insanity.

And speaking of insanity, why on earth does Obama continue to provide millions of dollars in arms to Al Qaeda to fight Khadafy! The U.S. Founding Fathers and their contemporaries had solutions for such treason: tar and feathers! And impeachment and conviction for such high crimes and misdemeanors.

So, should we Americans simply follow Obama in a leap of blind faith when his actions have clearly supported International interests more than U.S. interests? For that matter, how can we trust a man who posts on the White House web site his purported birth certificate that used multiple digital computerized graphic layers? That technology didn’t even exist in 1961 when Obama was supposedly born! Should we really blindly believe that the word of this man can be trusted as to the identity of the body dumped into ocean as shark bait? Are we to blindly believe Obama is a true steward of our U.S. resources, exercising good leadership in truth, justice and the American way?

And what are the reasons the Obama administration for the bizarre blazingly fast burial at sea?

1) So that no land burial site would be glorified by al-Qaeda.
2) Because it was difficult to find a nation willing to accept his body.
3) Muslim customs are (supposedly) to bury the dead at sea within 24 hours, and of course we wouldn’t want to offend bin Laden’s family by not following proper protocol. By the way, such sea burials are for Muslims who are stone broke and don’t have money for land burials.

So, are these reasons sufficient enough for you to believe Obama was justified in disposing of the body and depriving U.S. citizens without forensic proof to support the tale of bin Laden’s demise? Again, we the legal citizens of the United States of America meaning we have genuine birth certificates paid more than one trillion dollars of our hard earned money in taxes to fight the Islamic terrorists who are wreaking havoc in our land and worldwide, only to get a lousy photo of the ringleader oh, and now we’re not even getting a photo? Or are we? It keeps going back and forth. And Obama first tells us Osama was armed and put up quite a fight. Then The White House amended their claim, saying bin Laden was unarmed.

Depending on when someone views this video, the photos may or may not be available and they may or may not be legitimate, and the White House may go back to their Gunfight at the OK Corral story again. And if the Obama White House ever does release the bin photos of the man they claim is bin Laden, they’d better not look like these fake ones: You’d think that anyone faking photos would at least change the pose a bit and maybe throw in a few more white hairs, I mean really! Just how stupid do our politicians think we the sheeple are, anyway??? They’re acting like we’re toddlers ready to hear our favorite fairy tale. But at least with children’s bedtime stories, the story stays the same, reading after reading. That continuity gives comfort to the child. We as adult citizens deserve more than just continuity; we deserve the truth!

We the people of the United State of America demand that Barack Hussein Obama resign over such blatant disloyalty to the citizens he swore an oath to serve and protect. In absence of said resignation we demand that the U.S. Senate initiate impeachment hearings immediately.

You know, there are a growing number of experts who believe Obama intentionally ‘found’ bin Laden to divert attention from the Project Gunrunner scandal in which a U.S. border patrol agent was killed, likely by one of the two guns found at the scene. The ATF directed gun stores to sell mover than one thousand guns to straw purchasers who walked those guns into Mexico to place them in the hands of Mexican drug cartels. Sadly, the House Judiciary hearings of Darrell Issa grilling Attorney General Eric Holder was all but blacked out due to the bin Laden media frenzy tied exactly to the White House dangling at the end of a stick the imminent release the bin Laden photos. Others believe Obama wants to divert attention from the plunging economy or him simply needed something to make him look Presidential to revive his popularity to win a second term.

For these reasons and more, Obama needs to step down or be impeached. He continues to pander to the whims and wishes of terror leaders and Muslim heads of state, making it quite clear that his first loyalty is to international interests, and not to U.S. Citizens.

First the government and many in the mass media ridiculed anyone who questioned the validity of Obama’s birth certificate, calling them the derisive term of: birthers.

Now they’ll probably nickname anyone who questions the death of Osama bin Laden with the label of “deathers.” You know, those annoying people who dare to question the U.S. government mantra and who dare expect the corpse of bin Laden to be preserved as forensic evidence and for other good reasons.

And in absence of a corpse, we at least expect to see videos from the special ops team that typically videotapes sensitive operations like this the Abbottabad raid on their mini-helmet cams for proper documentation. Such pictures can then be matched through face-mapping techniques for positive identification so the U.S. citizenry doesn’t have to take the word of one government DNA expert who has a vested interest in pleasing his or her employer. And last but not least, we need to see photos of the corpse that show a decade of aging on a man on the run with failing kidneys, or plausible proof of a successful kidney transplant. Showing a scar from such an operation would at least lend some credence to the government bin Laden narrative.

Americans deserve proof of who was killed in the Pakistan raid. So, we collectively ask Obama of Osama: “Where’s the Death Certificate?”

Things in Denmark seems to smell just fine lately. That warm scent of Danish bakery rolls are in the air. But something is rotten in America and many are buying the bait of the burial at sea, hook, line and sinker as if it were sweet perfume. Are you buying? Or do you also demand the death certificate?

“The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies.” –Adolf Hitler

Show graphics of these statements:

“The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated” -Mark Twain

“Reports of my death have been greatly delayed.” -Osama bin Laden

“Reports of my death and my influence have been grossly exaggerated.” -Satan

(ends with graphic reading, “Was it really bin Laden? What happens in sharks, stays in sharks.”)

Read more at News Scooper