The Man You Want at Your Side When It Counts

Monty Pelerin

… nobody really thinks of President Obama as the man you want at your side when the chips are down.

Walter Russell Mead

The kindest word I can think of to describe Barack Obama is incompetent. All other descriptors question his intelligence or intent. There has never been another president like him before. Likely there have been presidents who were as incompetent (if that is the manner in which to describe him), but none other so egotistical, arrogant and dishonest.

In Flim Flam Man, I suggested Obama should be impeached, although didn’t believe that would happen because of the feckless nature of the political class and their willingness to do whatever necessary to advance their chances for re-election, include ignore or violate the Constitution. Now it is too late for that, although the country is arguably in immense and increasing danger as a consequence of the boy-child running the country.

Doug Ross reflects on the situation and highly recommends the piece by Mr. Mead:

————————————————

“One of the most cynical, cold-blooded, and nastily divisive moves an American President has made”

Read the entire piece and pass it on. It’s that important.

…To see the full cynicism of the Obama approach to the refugee issue, one has only to ask President Obama’s least favorite question: Why is there a Syrian refugee crisis in the first place?

Obama’s own policy decisions—allowing Assad to convert peaceful demonstrations into an increasingly ugly civil war, refusing to declare safe havens and no fly zones—were instrumental in creating the Syrian refugee crisis. This crisis is in large part the direct consequence of President Obama’s decision to stand aside and watch Syria burn. For him to try and use a derisory and symbolic program to allow 10,000 refugees into the United States in order to posture as more caring than those evil Jacksonian rednecks out in the benighted sticks is one of the most cynical, cold-blooded, and nastily divisive moves an American President has made in a long time.

Moreover, many of those “benighted” people were willing to sign up for the U.S. military and go to fight ISIS in Syria to protect the refugees. Many Americans who now oppose the President’s ill-considered refugee program have long supported the use of American power to create “safe zones” in Syria so the refugees could be sheltered and fed in their own country. If President Obama seriously cared about the fate of Syria’s millions of displaced people, he would have started to organize those safe havens years ago…

…Not even President Bush’s decision to go to war in Iraq has been as destructive for Europe or as damaging to the Transatlantic alliance as President Obama’s hard-hearted and short-sighted Syria policy. The flood of refugees is shaking the European Union to its core, and Obama’s policy has cemented perceptions among many around the world that the United States is no longer the kind of useful ally that it once was. France didn’t even bother to invoke NATO’s Article 5 after the Paris attacks; nobody really thinks of President Obama as the man you want at your side when the chips are down.

…The collapse of President Obama’s Syria policy is hardly a partisan issue. He has repeatedly overruled his own national security officials, top diplomats, and advisors, many of whom have been horrified by the President’s passivity in the face of onrushing disaster. His abrupt policy switch on airstrikes left many senior Democrats who had supported his apparent determination to enforce his “red line” against Assad twisting in the wind.

To think that conspicuous moral posturing and holy posing over a symbolic refugee quota could turn President Obama from the goat to the hero of the Syrian crisis is absurd. Wringing your hands while Syria turns into a hell on earth, and then taking a token number of refugees, can be called many things, but decent and wise are not among them…

…For no one, other than the Butcher Assad and the unspeakable al-Baghdadi, is as responsible for the humanitarian catastrophe in Syria as is President Obama. No one has committed more sins of omission, no one has so ruthlessly sacrificed the well-being of Syria’s people for his own ends, as the man in the White House. In all the world, only President Obama had the ability to do anything significant to prevent this catastrophe; in all the world no one turned his back so coldly and resolutely on the suffering Syrians as the man who sits in the White House today—a man who is now lecturing his fellow citizens on what he insists is their moral inferiority before his own high self-esteem…

…Things can and will get worse as long as American policy continues to flounder; instead of arguing about how to shelter a few thousand refugees we need to look hard at how we are failing to address the disaster that has created millions, and that continues to grow.

I repeat: read the whole thing, every word, and forward it on to everyone on your list, Democrats especially.

If such a party really does exist outside of ISIS, La Raza, CPUSA, and the SEIU.

http://www.economicnoise.com/2015/11/19/60753/ 

Read more great articles at Economic Noise here:

http://www.economicnoise.com