Canadian Court Commands Father to Treat His Daughter as a Boy

At least conscientious parents can protect their children from the militant depravity advanced by the authorities — except of course when judges decree that they must take part in the sickness:

Faced with two estranged parents in utter disagreement about their daughter’s wish to be a boy, a British Columbia Supreme Court judge has appointed the child a legal guardian to protect her interests.

The father not only wants his daughter to cease taking hormone blockers but also to cease all contact with transgender activists or transgender-friendly therapists.

Though the case is about whether the 11-year-old can give informed consent to such serious medical treatment, which is intended to delay the onset of female puberty, the judge appears to have already conceded the point by referring to the girl by her preferred, male, initials, J.K., and accepting her male self-identification.

In his ruling, Mr. Justice Ronald Skolrood declared that, “This case is really about J.K. and his [sic] role in determining his [sic] own future. In my view, these issues cannot be properly considered without J.K.’s direct participation.”

Actually, what it is about is grotesque social engineering, and testing the furthest limits of progressive totalitarianism.

A major reason that the authorities have taken up the bizarre and previously inconsequential LGBT cause with such ruthless vigor is that they are using it as a crowbar to pry apart the concept of family, which along with Christianity serves as a major impediment to absolute rule.

The father has been commanded by court order to refer to his daughter with male pronouns. This goes beyond Big Brother’s 2 + 2 = 5 into a morally diseased realm of totalitarianism, degeneracy, and the coercive banishment of objective reality that previous generations could never have imagined.

On a tip from seaoh.