Donald Trump Again Alludes to Violence Against Hillary Clinton
MIAMI — Donald Trump mixed policy with intimations of violence in Miami on Friday, reversing his position on re-engaging with Cuba and pushing for Hillary Clinton’s security to disarm because of her proposed firearm reforms.
Trump represented Clinton’s position on gun rights as wanting to “destroy your Second Amendment” and said that her bodyguards should no longer carry firearms in light of her policy stance, which includes expanded background checks for gun sales.
“She doesn’t want guns, take theirs — let’s see what happens to her,” Trump said. “Take their guns away, okay? It’ll be very dangerous.” SOURCE
If you don’t believe the American news media is in the pockets of the DNC, Hillary Clinton and every wealthy Dem donor, just read the insinuations of this story from NBC and if, after reading it, you’re not convinced where the loyalties of the media lie, then you need to LEAVE this blog, never to return, because YOU are too damned stupid to breathe.
Does that mean I *alluded* to the death of dumber than dirt Dems?
I don’t know if Hillary Clinton and her entire campaign staff are that dumb, that desperate or just have NO idea what the truth is, I mean TRUTH!
Donald Trump didn’t *allude* to anything, he stood in the spotlight and he did what Donald Trump is so well known for doing; he spoke the truth and he was very blunt while facing the world in doing so.
Trump’s comments were slammed by Clinton’s campaign on Friday night:
“Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for President, has a pattern of inciting people to violence. Whether this is done to provoke protesters at a rally or casually or even as a joke, it is an unacceptable quality in anyone seeking the job of Commander in Chief,” Clinton’s campaign manager, Robby Mook, wrote in a release.
Mook? His name is MOOK?
This may explain why some of the lunacy we’re seeing from the Clinton campaign has come to be. Do you KNOW what the definition of MOOK is?
mook /mo͝ok/ noun
noun: mook; plural noun: mooks
a stupid or incompetent person
Hillary Clinton, her staff, the DNC and most Democrats everywhere are as anti-gun as anyone can be, the Right knows that, Conservatives it too but Dems are a whole different breed of STOOPID and the American Media feeds on that incredibly high degree of STOOPID to sell stories and to, as nicely as I can say it, promote their candidate, Clinton, in hopes that a real TRUTH SPEAKER never gets elected.
The TRUTH, and that is the business I am in, the truth is that Hillary is one of the most anti-gun people to ever rise to such a position of power.
July 1999: “If you have guns in your home,” Clinton tells middle school students on Long Island, “tell your parents to keep them away from you and your friends and your little brothers and sisters.” Addressing the National Education Association in Orlando, she says, “It does not make sense for us at this point in our history to turn our backs on the reality that there are too many guns and too many children have access to those guns—and we have to act to prevent that.”
June 2000: Clinton endorses a bill introduced by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) that would require licensing and registration for handguns. “I stand in support of this common-sense legislation to license everyone who wishes to purchase a gun,” she says. “I also believe that every new handgun sale or transfer should be registered in a national registry, such as Chuck is proposing.”
January 2008: Asked during a Democratic presidential debate whether “you’ve backed off a national licensing [and] registration plan,” Clinton says, “Yes.” She avers that “we need to enforce the laws that we have on the books” but adds, “I would also work to reinstate the assault weapons ban. We now have, once again, police deaths going up around the country, and in large measure because bad guys now have assault weapons again.”
May 2014: “I think again we’re way out of balance. We’ve got to rein in what has become almost an article of faith that almost anybody can have a gun anywhere at any time. And I don’t believe that is in the best interest of the vast majority of people.”
June 2014: “I believe that we need a more thoughtful conversation,” Clinton says while promoting her memoir on CNN. “We cannot let a minority of people—and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people—hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.” She says she favors “background checks that work” and twice refers erroneously to mass shooters with “automatic” weapons. SOURCE
Yes, Hillary Clinton wants YOUR guns taken away from YOU, all Trump did was throw out the idea that Hillary needs to level the playing field a bit; if she wants OUR guns then she needs to have her security details get rid of their guns too.
That is NOT a threat; it is not an incitement of violence.
“She doesn’t want guns, take theirs — let’s see what happens to her,” Trump said. “Take their guns away, okay? It’ll be very dangerous.”
Donald Trump spoke the TRUTH; it will be dangerous, make no mistake about it, but why should Hillary Clinton have armed protection while denying the American citizen the same privilege?
Surely Liberal HYPOCRISY hasn’t come into play? Has it?
Liberal hypocrisy, combined with the far Left support of the media is the most DANGEROUS thing we face because even if the Dems and Company did manage to take OUR guns you can bet they will still have theirs.
An ARMED man is a citizen, an UNARMED man is a subject, and that my friends is the goal of Hillary, the Dems, the DNC, the Left in general as well as that of every Communist, Socialist and anti-American cretin in this once great nation.