Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Huma Abedin Never Had Security Clearance and Secretary Clinton Allowed Her Unauthorized Access

Tuesday, November 1, 2016 19:20
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Via Billy

* In documents disclosed to Citizen Researcher Dr. Larry Kawa by the US State Department, Huma Abedin signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement (SF-312) for classified information under penalty of perjury.
* In the agreement Abedin is advised against “negligent handling of classified information” could cause “irreparable injury” to the United States.
* In addition Abedin agrees that “unauthorized disclosure of classified information by me” could result in the violation of several intelligence and security laws, including the espionage act.
* Disclosure of classified information to Anthony Weiner through “negligent handling of classified information” would be a violation of this agreement, and a felony.  Aiding and Abetting Huma Abedin to commit this crime or cover it up would also be a felony.
* The Non-Disclosure & the Separation Agreement also reveal significant deficiencies at the State Department as several sections were never counter signed by the State Department.
* The Separation Statement (OF-109) affirmatively states that she has returned all classified material to the State Department and does not have access to any classified information.
* The Anthony Weiner email scandal revealed that Huma Abedin still had access to classified information on her Yahoo! account, which was accessed from Weiner’s laptop.  
In other document releases, it was revealed that Hillary Rodham Clinton typically sent classified emails to Huma Abedin’s unsecure Yahoo! account  to be printed.  This would be a felony on the part of Hillary Rodham Clinton for illegally transferring classified documents through an insecure system, ultimately exposing them to individuals who did not have security clearance and potentially exposing them to hostile actors.  
* On Sept. 22 2016, according to CNN and other sources, more than 500 million Yahoo! accounts were hacked.  Hackers likely gained access to Huma Abedin’s Yahoo account.    

* This raises the question that in addition to classified information existing electronically within Clinton servers, Huma Abedin has printed files of classified information that have yet to be accounted for.  Such as revelation would require that a search warrant be issued for her home and business to search for classified material.


Initial access to these documents was sent to me by deputy assistant secretary of state Margaret Grafeld after my mail was tampered with in regards to a FOIA request I did for Hillary Clinton separation statement. There is still an open Senate investigation regarding a Mail temperature charge.
The first document known as an SF – 312 is a nondisclosure agreement for classified information. Huma Abedin signed onto the binding terms and conditions under threat of perjury. Please note condition number seven makes her potentially guilty under the espionage act… 18 USC 793 and 1924. She did not sign onto the required line swearing that she had a security briefing. That is a necessary condition in order to have top secret security clearance, a condition which was never met.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • Room With a View

    Hilary must’ve been blinded by love, she had no intention to let the Saudis know everything that america was doing,….for years.

  • desertspeaks

    NOW we know WHAT HAPPENED…. James Comey was so enthralled and fixated on “INTENT” BECAUSE he chose to attempt to charge hillary under title 42 usc 2272/2273/2274/2275/2276/2277 all require intent..and is part of the separation statement.

    He also CHOSE not to charge hillary under title 18 which would have not only put her in prison, under 18 usc 783 or 18 usc 1001 but HAD HE CHOSEN TO CHARGE HER UNDER 18 usc 2071 WHEN found guilty SHE WOULD BE DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY OFFICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES! and oddly, in the separation statement, one of the charges that hillary would have agreed to be charged with if she breached the agreement IS 18 USC 2071 as evidenced above in huma’s separation statement.. they don’t have different separation statements for every person, they all sign the same shit!

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.