Profile image
By Doug Ross @ Journal (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

A Simple Plan: How President Trump Can Bypass a Rogue and Lawless 9th Circuit Court

Thursday, February 9, 2017 18:07
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

By Jim Simpson

B4INREMOTE-aHR0cHM6Ly8zLmJwLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbS8teng3SlB0bHBoVUUvV0owT0hiTURzWEkvQUFBQUFBQUJzV1UvNVVJelo2WkxCbDRiOGNoSk9GMFFRN0t2QzBnTDFmaWJnQ0xjQi9zMTYwLzAyMDctY2Jzbi1kb2p0cmF2ZWxiYW4tMTI0NzQ5Mi02NDB4MzYwJTI1NUIxJTI1NUQuanBnPresident Trump needs to deny the Left a victory over his immigration executive order. The court challenge now being heard by the infamously unconstitutional and extremist 9th Circuit threatens to set a precedent that will codify open borders and leave the president powerless to protect us. Trump can snatch victory from the jaws of defeat and deny the Left their unconscionable and unconstitutional attempted power grab by rescinding this EO and issuing stronger multiple replacements as stand alone orders.

The president cannot lose here. We must protect our borders; keep out the terrorists and rein in out-of-control immigration. It is the signal issue that got him elected. It is also the signal action needed to save this country from the Left’s malevolent intentions. The Left is attempting to subvert our country by simply replacing its population with a more malleable, sympathetic one. Unlike the immigrants of yesteryear, today’s are largely illiterate, welfare-dependent, unwilling to learn our language and definitely hostile to American culture and traditions. And while they are in many cases fleeing conditions created by their countries’ socialist policies, they nonetheless bring socialist ideas with them. As our country has become more “multi-cultural”, it has drifted ever leftward.


This was no mistake.

President Trump can and must rescind this executive order. Despite it’s hesitation, the 9th Circuit is virtually guaranteed to agree with the ruling by District Judge Robert Chambers halting Trump’s immigration ban. As the initial complaint was not justified by immigration law, which provides the president clear authority to do what he did, it would set a horrible precedent in eroding the president’s ability to protect the nation. If it goes to the Supreme Court, it will likely lose. Justice Kennedy will side with the leftists. With an 8 person court, even a 4-4 decision would mean the 9th Circuit ruling holds. Even with Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, a likely Kennedy defection would mean 5-4 for the Left. And support for Trump’s position is not even certain with Gorsuch.

Rescinding the EO would be a victory, not a defeat. First, it would prevent the Left from getting a major win in court that would alter permanently a president’s ability to control our borders. The lawsuit and likely favorable court ruling defy immigration law. They should not be allowed to get away with it. As abominable as it is, the current state of enforcement is better than what would result. The Left would like to thwart Trump’s agenda with endless lawsuits. Their victory here will encourage much more of the same.

But more importantly, Trump should reissue a score of executive orders that address the same issues as the current one, but make them even more muscular. If the Left is going to play dirty like this, make them pay for it. Give them something they will dislike even more and force them to fight many battles instead of just one. Perhaps that will cool their ardor for obstructionist lawsuits and nationwide, Democrat funded violence that threatens to drag this country into civil war:

  1. Replace the 3 month ban on immigration from seven terrorist-producing nations with a 6 month ban on the same seven nations. President Obama issued a six-month ban on refugees from Iraq in 2011. He did so after two Kentucky-based Iraqi refugees were discovered to be former insurgent IED makers. So much for our supposedly infallible vetting process. Despite much-ballyhooed improvements, the current vetting procedure places almost all emphasis on processing refugees as quickly as possible, with few, if any national security safeguards. The seven nations were also first identified by the Obama DHS.
  1. Consider expanding the list to all nations of terrorism concern. The State Department keeps a list which formally includes State Sponsors of Terrorism: Syria, Sudan, Iran, and Countries of Particular Concern: Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan. Those countries on the DHS list not identified by the State Department, i.e. Somalia, Libya, Yemen and Iraq, should be added to State’s list.
  1. Extend suspension of the refugee admissions program (USRAP) to a full year as requested by numerous members of Congress and cities all over the country begging for relief. (It now only lasts 120 days). President Trump does not need an executive order for this. He can simply send a letter to Congress, informing it of his intentions. Refugee caps for FY 2017 would be reduced to zero.
  1. Issue all other components of the current EO as separate, standalone orders. Many of these are not challenged by the court in this EO, but are desperately needed. For example: ending the Obama administration’s insane policy of allowing U.S. entry of foreign nationals who have aided terrorists, focusing on those refugee minorities facing the worst persecution (e.g. the Christians that Obama ignored), enacting uniform screening standards for all immigrants, suspending the visa waiver program, completing the Biometric Entry-Exit Tracking System, visa reciprocity, and data transparency.

Trump needs to rescind this executive order to snatch victory out of the Left’s intolerable hands. He needs to replace it with others that will punish the Left for their vicious, relentless, unconstitutional and often illegal tactics, and force them to fight every single item, piece by piece.

Read more stories at Daily Caller.


We encourage you to Share our Reports, Analyses, Breaking News and Videos. Simply Click your Favorite Social Media Button and Share.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 4 comments
  • King David

    Sounds great!

  • Deputy Dawg

    The ruling was “contradictio in adjecto” or a contradiction in terms. What I mean by that is that the law clearly grants the president in times of hostility the legal authority to restrict travel coming from enemy territories, including countries where terrorism is currently uncontrollable. There really is no debating that truism. The fact that ISIS has publicly sworn to bring terrorism to America makes this a national security threat. Her ruling both ignores presidential authority and the law. It replaces law with controversial sentiment. The judges job was to examine de lege lata, or the law as it exists without consideration of how things should be, or how she may wish it were in her vision of a perfect world.

    The consideration was as simple as whether or not the president’s discretionary order to stop travel was legally valid or not and it is. That should have been that! The fact that the court has ventured beyond that role works to contradict the law in it’s entirety. This behind the bench activism is truly a gift giving valid standing for further appeal. I suspect this was Trumps plan all along. I knew something was odd when his legal team failed to provide to the Appeals Court the list of immigrants who came to the US from the very countries in question and have since committed serious crimes. They gave the list to the media. He apparently wanted, perhaps even planned for the case to propel to the high court. Trump is truly a genius. He is always three moves ahead in this chess game.


    • Just me

      Using your same deluded logic – any president can then use this same theory to declare martial law and override the constitution in any and every aspect they desire. Sounds like a pretty dangerous president to set.

  • charlie2dogs

    the legal system is the real swamp that needs to be drained, judges and lawyers are the ones destroying the country through nothing more than a system of racketeering and plunder, greed and corruption.

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Top Global

Top Alternative




Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.