World Health Organization Spends $200 Million per Year on Travel Expenses

Like the rest of the United Nations, the World Health Organization is a racket:

According to the Associated Press, the WHO routinely has spent about $200 million a year on travel expenses—more than what it spends to fight AIDS and hepatitis ($70.5 million), tuberculosis ($59 million), and malaria ($61 million) combined.

To state what should be obvious even to nitwit bureauweenies,

If you work for global nonprofit you probably shouldn’t be flying first class or spending $1,008 per night on a hotel suite that has marble bathrooms and a dining room that seats eight. That’s what the AP says Dr. Margaret Chan, director-general of the WHO, did earlier this month while in Guinea to join the country’s president in celebrating the world’s first Ebola vaccine. Chan alone spent more than $370,000 in travel in 2014—and she wasn’t even the WHO executive with the highest travel expenses for the year.

Could the outlandish expenses be necessary? Of course not.

If so, then why does Doctors Without Borders, which has a staff of about 37,000 aid workers versus WHO’s 7,000 staffers, spend only $43 million on travel a year?

Here’s why: Doctors Without Borders is a legitimate charitable NGO, not part of the corrupt United Nations, which Americans are forced to fund lavishly with their tax dollars.

On a tip from R F.