Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.

By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Division in America Protects the Constitution from Communism

Thursday, June 28, 2018 9:26

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Bertrand Daily Report The War For Our Mind & Soul Continues

By Capt. Dave Bertrand, Ret.

Where would America be if we did not have the two party system? Where would we be if 9/11 had not happened?

I can assure you it wouldn’t be in our best interest if we had only one party. But….that’s what the Democrat Party would love to see in years to come, since their plans for transforming America into a Socialist country with MORE rogue Communists at the top could easily demolish the Republican Party and the Constitution, and you can bet…..the Republican Party will likely be overrun by RINOS from here on out.

Why does America need to be divided minus the “conquer” element? Because division of America’s population is a phenomenon that protects the Constitution.

If WE became a one party system with a Communist dictator in the White House, the laws written for Sedition and Treason would come into effect with vengeance. Anti-Communist journalists, citizens, and pro-American / anti-government rhetoric would be dealt with immediately….and not only dealt with by government goon squads, but by neighbors and employers.

In Cuba, there is a “Block Captain” in all neighborhoods, watching, listening and selecting certain citizens for prison. Isn’t the insane Mad Maxine Waters instigating a form of sedition gainst Trump supporters with her chants for war?

In 1917, Democrat President Woodrow Wilson decided to enter WWI with millions of drafted citizens while strong arming citizens into paying for U.S. involvement in that war by forcing citizens to buy War Bonds, and if you were reluctant to buy….you got a visit. He used local teachers, preachers, and law enforcement to encourage War Bond support by those that did not want to participate and later deducted funds from employee paychecks.

Woodrow Wilson went as far as to initiate the Sedition Act to go after ANYONE, in particular American / German citizens, or anyone that spoke-out against the war, against the government, and/or against the President. Thousands of Americans were sentenced to prison for an average term of 7 months. If your neighbor or employer overheard Seditious talk, and you were labeled a possible spy….you and your family were sent to internment camps.

Today, the Dems want to project their tainted past by accusing the Trump Administration of separating families at the border, because the Dems believe an MS-13 or child trafficker is not a criminal and should be released into society with their children, while some of those children are not their own.

The time limit set for re-uniting children with parents is unrealistic since DNA testing must be accomplished. The solution that President Trump has presented, is (yes) join them together, but place them in “Detention Centers” a.k.a. Military FEMA Camps. Others that do not appear to be anything but regular immigrants….will be deported and “directed to a legal Point-of-Entry.”

The point being………….

If we had only one party, every American would be watched and placed under surveillance for Sedition if you did not support the government, the police or military. Opposition to the Trump Administration’s immigration policy, by the Dems, is protected under the Constitution, but under Hillary Clinton….could have been drastically different as Conservatives and Independents argued for secure borders.

Because of our two party system…..today the Dems can be seditious all day long and are protected by the Constitution, but they have crossed that line, which requires legal action against those threatening death of the president and the kidnapping of the President’s children, which Dems believe is their freedom of speech.

The Dems get away with instigating a Civil War and if they won a Civil War and forced an emergency presidential election, you can bet the Constitution would be scrapped eventually and a one party system would bring America right back to 1917 Democrat controlled tyranny while Communism would eventually consume this nation.

Our freedom and liberties to express ourselves with opinions against a sitting president and foreign policy would end immediately with a one party system. That is why Obama re-organized 800 FEMA Camps to be ready for occupation, setting the stage for a Hillary Clinton presidency. The “Patriot Act” and the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would have kicked-in under Clinton.

During the Obama regime, Conservatives enjoyed the same freedoms, but little did we know, the “No Fly List” expanded, NSA and Google were on us like flies on shit, and even though we now feel protected and vindicated with pending arrests coming soon at the highest levels of the Obama regime, the evil forces of the Communist Left are still watching our emails and text messages while censorship has gone nuts under commerce.

We can thank George W. Bush (war criminal) for creating the “Patriot Act” before 9/11 and little did we know at the time…the “Patriot” act was written to go after Patriots in America as reminiscent of Woodrow Wilson’s sedition grab.

9/11 was a false flag attack……an excuse to change the regimes in 7 Middle East countries. It was also meant to place a wide range of controls on any opposition within America that opposed the wars…..similar to 1917 and WWI. The destruction of criminal records at the WTC offices and financial records at the Pentagon were just the icing on-the-cake…..including the large amount of gold stolen from the basement of a WTC tower.

Then came the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) signed into law by Hussein Obama with feel good budgeting for wars, but deep within the NDAA is a typical Woodrow Wilson 1917 provision (to protect war crimes by Obama and Hillary Clinton, if she had won).

“The most controversial provisions to receive wide attention were contained in subsections 1021–1022 of Title X, Subtitle D, entitled “Counter-Terrorism”, authorizing the indefinite military detention of persons the government suspects of involvement in terrorism, including U.S. citizens arrested on American soil.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012

If we had a one party system…..anyone opposing the government and policies, would be quickly labeled a “Domestic Terrorist,” as the government attempted to do against the Bundy’s and their supporters.

And because we have been in psychological warfare, bordering on a Civil War, the reality of what could happen, would not give either side the protections we assume to be prevalent under a Republican controlled Congress.

All WE as Americans have, for or against what the government does, is our party, but depends on which party controls the government. However….in a Civil War situation, and because there are hundreds of Left leaning local law enforcement types spread across America, the likelihood of either party being incarcerated in a FEMA Camp type facility is highly probable.

The various so-called “Domestic Terrorist” classifications changes as one party advances ahead of the other party, but if you live in Portland, New York, Chicago or San Francisco, guess who goes to jail? And because the Left / Right Paradigm is just an illusion, with scant protections….apparently, the 9/11 Truth Movement is about to get a second hit for reason(s) I cannot explain, but it should be a warning. (SEE ARTICLE BELOW).

The table is set with all the dishware and utensils, while the appetizers are being served, WE are all waiting for the main course to arrive and it’s coming….

—Dave Bertrand

Techniques Used to Disrupt 9/11 Questioning

In 2008, Harvard professors Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule proposed that the government should engage in “cognitive infiltration” of citizen groups that seek the truth about 9/11. The proposal was that government operatives, whether anonymous or otherwise, should infiltrate and disrupt the groups. They wrote, “Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action. “

The following year, this anti-Constitutional stance was rewarded when Sunstein was made director of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Members of the 9/11 Truth Movement responded with detailed criticism.

Of course, the idea of infiltrating a grassroots action group, to disrupt and defame its members, was not new. The FBI program called COINTELPRO was a widely reported example after it was revealed in the early 1970s to have infiltrated citizen groups seeking civil rights and peace. After being revealed, COINTELPRO techniques continued at the FBI and elsewhere in government.

Since 9/11, journalists have noted that government infiltration of political groups is no longer a rare exception but is the norm. The goals of such infiltration are to destabilize and prevent citizen dissent by creating a negative public image for the target group and conflict within the group. Infiltration is easy when it comes to a grassroots movement like 9/11 Truth. That is, you cannot just claim to be a 9/11 Commission member or an employee of a government agency but anyone can say they are a truth seeker. The beauty of this for government operatives is that they can control both sides of the conversation.

Comments

Online:
Visits:	1,604,573,335
Stories:	8,134,400